ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
12 July 2013, 05:44 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: London
Posts: 45
|
Extra cash for a 5513 vs 14060 tri dial?
Is it worth putting a couple of hundred Gbp and getting a 1979 5513 ? Condition wise the 14060 is better (its 18 yrs younger)... :-S
|
12 July 2013, 07:06 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,035
|
Well that depends what you intend to do with the watch good 5513 are getting harder to fine and should hold there prices well.But its possible that early 14060 could become the 5513 of the future,now if you want the watch for daily wear depending on if properly serviced both would be fine. So its swings and runabouts, if no service history on the watches I would go with the 14060 .
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
12 July 2013, 09:11 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: London
Posts: 45
|
Thanks Padi always helpful!
|
12 July 2013, 09:16 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/Tudor Divers
Posts: 7,973
|
Either would be great, but I would prefer the 5513. Remember........ Plexi is sexy
__________________
Best Regards, Jason Just Say "NO" to Polishing Card-Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch Curmudgeons LIfe is too short to wear inexpensive watches PLEXI IS SEXY |
13 July 2013, 12:23 AM | #5 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,494
|
condition, condition, condition.......
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
13 July 2013, 12:36 AM | #6 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
|
I'd go 5513
|
13 July 2013, 01:45 AM | #7 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 26,846
|
5513 for sure
|
13 July 2013, 04:00 AM | #8 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: vancouver
Posts: 1,918
|
Quote:
The bezel is also much flatter and doesn't make the watch look as clunky.
__________________
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.