ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

garymyman · 17 July 2013, 12:39 AM

This is the best looking watch I've seen in a long time. And it's "only" 41.5mm! Does anyone have one yet?

The stainless (or gold) on black leather strap gets my vote. Here's a review on Hodinke

Noonan · 17 July 2013, 12:47 AM

I saw pics through Hodinkee recently. I think it looks amazing. The white dial version looks great as well. Definitely one I'd like to pick up at some point.

sncarney18 · 17 July 2013, 12:59 AM

It should have the "Broad Arrow" hand on the hour not in the chronograph.

The GMT Master · 17 July 2013, 01:31 AM

I'm glad they did something different - I'm a big fan of Alpha hands, they have a certain elegance. Don't think these have hit the market, but you can guarantee that this will be the most wearable cal. 9300 based model

Frogman4me · 17 July 2013, 01:59 AM

I'm just glad this is the first cal. 9300 under 44mm! Look forward to trying it on the AD.

tinger · 17 July 2013, 02:26 AM

I hope the case size is really smaller.. unlike the difference(or lack of) between the Smp and the First in Space.
Will see it tonight at the boutique.

applebook · 17 July 2013, 02:32 AM

I think that I just fell in love.

The GMT Master · 17 July 2013, 06:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frogman4me

I'm just glad this is the first cal. 9300 under 44mm! Look forward to trying it on the AD.

The cal. 9300 De Ville is 42mm, but this is the first cal. 9300 Speedmaster under 44m

Ramiks · 17 July 2013, 06:33 AM

Perfect!

mater · 17 July 2013, 06:49 AM

In love with it. Been wanting a 9300 in 42mm and this is just right! Going to trade my 44mm for this when it drops!

tinger · 17 July 2013, 10:53 AM

Just saw the watch at the boutique.
Its a let down for those with smaller wrists.
The vertical lug to lug length is longer than the Darkside.
Thickness seems very very similar.

The Darkside is pretty awesome. Depending on the surface, the monobloc case is both brushed and shiny. I wished the cloth strap was thicker though.

Limited volume of the Darkside will be available for those who prepaid at the boutique in Oct. ADs getting them in Jan

Boardman · 17 July 2013, 12:01 PM

This one is on my drool list.

I will have this....someday.

HL65 · 17 July 2013, 07:33 PM

Very nice!

KeepTicking · 18 July 2013, 08:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sncarney18

It should have the "Broad Arrow" hand on the hour not in the chronograph.

I have to agree, I love the watch except for the broad arrow hand on the chrono

Chainring · 18 July 2013, 01:21 PM

I agree. That is outstanding.

conrail · 19 July 2013, 12:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Boardman

This one is on my drool list.

I will have this....someday.

Wow! I hadn't seen that one before. Omega is really making some fantastic classic looking watches recently. Bravo!

Marcela · 19 July 2013, 12:44 AM

peitron · 22 July 2013, 05:18 AM

I love the steel bracelet. If it can be fitted on a 3570 I'm going to be all over it.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

RLROCK · 31 July 2013, 06:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Boardman

This one is on my drool list.

I will have this....someday.

Is this a new 57 Broad Arrow for 2014? Does it replace the current Broad Arrow line?

fossil · 2 August 2013, 07:19 AM

Any news regarding pricing of the 57?

witch watch · 2 August 2013, 11:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tinger

Just saw the watch at the boutique.
Its a let down for those with smaller wrists.
The vertical lug to lug length is longer than the Darkside.
Thickness seems very very similar.

The Darkside is pretty awesome. Depending on the surface, the monobloc case is both brushed and shiny. I wished the cloth strap was thicker though.

Limited volume of the Darkside will be available for those who prepaid at the boutique in Oct. ADs getting them in Jan

I disagree it's a let down, & what to do mean by 'smaller wrists'? I have 6.5 inch wrist & I thought it looked great on me. Your right with the thickness I could not notice much in it at all & again I agree with the strap on the Darkside it is the biggest let down about the watch, they should have went with the same kind as IWC's Topgun has but I do like the fact that it has a fat tang buckle rather than the TG's thinner one.

garymyman · 3 August 2013, 08:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fossil

Any news regarding pricing of the 57?

I read the steel ones start around $8500. However, if the PO 8500 is any indication, there is a gulf between MSRP and actual selling price.

tinger · 3 August 2013, 08:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by witch watch

I disagree it's a let down, & what to do mean by 'smaller wrists'? I have 6.5 inch wrist & I thought it looked great on me. Your right with the thickness I could not notice much in it at all & again I agree with the strap on the Darkside it is the biggest let down about the watch, they should have went with the same kind as IWC's Topgun has but I do like the fact that it has a fat tang buckle rather than the TG's thinner one.

Let down in the sense that its tag as a 42mm watch.. but the vertical measurement/ lugs are longer than the po9300. The bracelet/strap forms a V shape on my round 6.5" wrist. This just clownish to me. Some can pull off this 'look', but I cant.

witch watch · 3 August 2013, 06:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tinger

Let down in the sense that its tag as a 42mm watch.. but the vertical measurement/ lugs are longer than the po9300. The bracelet/strap forms a V shape on my round 6.5" wrist. This just clownish to me. Some can pull off this 'look', but I cant.

Have to say I never knew that & I get where you are coming from with the look on the strap on your wrist, has me thinking now did it look that way on me too

MP5 · 3 August 2013, 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Boardman

This one is on my drool list.

I will have this....someday.

This would look shocking in the Patek black gold markers/hands

witch watch · 3 August 2013, 07:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by garymyman

I read the steel ones start around $8500. .

Iirc they were around the £5700 mark in steel & nearer 7K in titianium.

sea-dweller · 4 August 2013, 02:53 AM

Nice!

Lew Archer · 4 August 2013, 07:10 AM

Oh, my...

Temptation, indeed.

melcruz66 · 5 August 2013, 06:21 PM

Beautiful, classic design. Very nice.

peitron · 6 August 2013, 05:05 AM

It really is not small. It's basically a 44 without curved lugs and crown guard. Will wear much larger than the Pro.

17 July 2013, 12:39 AM	#1
garymyman "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2012 Real Name: Gray Location: New Orleans Watch: Sub; Ω Posts: 242	Speedmaster '57 This is the best looking watch I've seen in a long time. And it's "only" 41.5mm! Does anyone have one yet? The stainless (or gold) on black leather strap gets my vote. Here's a review on Hodinke

17 July 2013, 02:32 AM	#7
applebook "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: vancouver Posts: 1,918	I think that I just fell in love. __________________

17 July 2013, 06:33 AM	#9
Ramiks "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2012 Real Name: Rami Location: Jordan Watch: Rolex and others Posts: 825	Perfect! __________________ "You never know how strong you are, until being strong is your only choice"

17 July 2013, 07:33 PM	#13
HL65 TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: Ken Location: SW Florida Watch: One on my wrist. Posts: 63,993	Very nice! __________________ *SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT*

22 July 2013, 05:18 AM	#18
peitron "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2012 Location: Neverland Posts: 67	I love the steel bracelet. If it can be fitted on a 3570 I'm going to be all over it. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD __________________

17 July 2013, 12:47 AM	#2
Noonan Banned Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: US Watch: 3570.50 Posts: 2,156	I saw pics through Hodinkee recently. I think it looks amazing. The white dial version looks great as well. Definitely one I'd like to pick up at some point.

17 July 2013, 12:59 AM	#3
sncarney18 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2012 Real Name: Steve Location: South Jersey Watch: Rolex and Omega Posts: 277	It should have the "Broad Arrow" hand on the hour not in the chronograph.

17 July 2013, 01:31 AM	#4
The GMT Master "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Real Name: Chris Location: England Posts: 8,150	I'm glad they did something different - I'm a big fan of Alpha hands, they have a certain elegance. Don't think these have hit the market, but you can guarantee that this will be the most wearable cal. 9300 based model

17 July 2013, 01:59 AM	#5
Frogman4me Banned Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Maryland Posts: 6,268	I'm just glad this is the first cal. 9300 under 44mm! Look forward to trying it on the AD.

17 July 2013, 02:26 AM	#6
tinger "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: weehawken Posts: 847	I hope the case size is really smaller.. unlike the difference(or lack of) between the Smp and the First in Space. Will see it tonight at the boutique.

17 July 2013, 06:49 AM	#10
mater "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: toronto Posts: 89	In love with it. Been wanting a 9300 in 42mm and this is just right! Going to trade my 44mm for this when it drops!

17 July 2013, 10:53 AM	#11
tinger "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: weehawken Posts: 847	Just saw the watch at the boutique. Its a let down for those with smaller wrists. The vertical lug to lug length is longer than the Darkside. Thickness seems very very similar. The Darkside is pretty awesome. Depending on the surface, the monobloc case is both brushed and shiny. I wished the cloth strap was thicker though. Limited volume of the Darkside will be available for those who prepaid at the boutique in Oct. ADs getting them in Jan

17 July 2013, 12:01 PM	#12
Boardman "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Real Name: Jay Location: Houston Watch: Rolex, Omega, IWC Posts: 321	This one is on my drool list. I will have this....someday.

18 July 2013, 01:21 PM	#15
Chainring "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2012 Real Name: Steve Location: Grand Junction CO Watch: A few, not enough. Posts: 1,725	I agree. That is outstanding.

19 July 2013, 12:44 AM	#17
Marcela "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2012 Location: USA Posts: 1,473

2 August 2013, 07:19 AM	#20
fossil "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Real Name: Dave Location: Anchorage, Alaska Watch: 14060M, DJ, Speedy Posts: 10	Any news regarding pricing of the 57?

4 August 2013, 02:53 AM	#27
sea-dweller "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Real Name: Dennis Location: Bay Area - 925 Posts: 40,018	Nice!

4 August 2013, 07:10 AM	#28
Lew Archer "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: L.A., Calif. Watch: Rolex Submariner Posts: 2,220	Oh, my... Temptation, indeed.

5 August 2013, 06:21 PM	#29
melcruz66 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2012 Real Name: Lemuel Location: Manila Watch: Sub LvC Posts: 23	Beautiful, classic design. Very nice.

6 August 2013, 05:05 AM	#30
peitron "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2012 Location: Neverland Posts: 67	It really is not small. It's basically a 44 without curved lugs and crown guard. Will wear much larger than the Pro. __________________

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)