ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

SPACE-DWELLER · 25 January 2008, 05:51 PM

Recently, I tried on the Omega PO chrono (ref. 2910.50.81 on omega.ch.).

Is it just me, or is this watch VERY big?! I have owned the IWC Doppelchronograph, but the Omega PO makes the IWC DC seem like a ladies' watch!

Anyway, I kinda like the Omega OP chrono, and might buy one some day........on a rubber strap, though.

One tiny thing that disturbes the dial design, IMHO, is the subdial at six o' clock that is smaller than the two others.

But I love the curved sapphire crystal. Is it AR coated on BOTH sides? I hope not! But the Omega website does not state anything about it. Also, the black part of the chrono buttons: What is it made of??

Does anyone here own that watch? I would appreciate your thoughts on it!

Genevapics · 25 January 2008, 07:09 PM

... IS coated on both sides with the AR. I know many Omega owners that wished it was just on the inside of the watch.

SPACE-DWELLER · 25 January 2008, 07:23 PM

Yeah, I thought so! That's a shame!

CEG · 25 January 2008, 09:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SPACE-DWELLER

Recently, I tried on the Omega PO chrono (ref. 2910.50.81 on omega.ch.).

Is it just me, or is this watch VERY big?! I have owned the IWC Doppelchronograph, but the Omega PO makes the IWC DC seem like a ladies' watch!

Anyway, I kinda like the Omega OP chrono, and might buy one some day........on a rubber strap, though.

One tiny thing that disturbes the dial design, IMHO, is the subdial at six o' clock that is smaller than the two others.

But I love the curved sapphire crystal. Is it AR coated on BOTH sides? I hope not! But the Omega website does not state anything about it. Also, the black part of the chrono buttons: What is it made of??

Does anyone here own that watch? I would appreciate your thoughts on it!

At 45.5mm it is MASSIVE ! I tried on the non chrono, and loved it. Hope to add it to my collection before the summer

roadcarver · 25 January 2008, 10:17 PM

IMHO, AR coating on both sides makes a huge difference. The glare is not as prominent.

SPACE-DWELLER · 25 January 2008, 11:46 PM

You're right, Vernon. But there are also disadvantages of an external AR coating. Firstly, the AR coating can easily get scratched, and once scratched it need a hole new AR treatment. Secondly, the AR coating is a smudge/fingerprint magnet.

roadcarver · 26 January 2008, 02:29 AM

Yeah, similar to any sapphire crystal, it is a finger print magnet. The acrylic ones are great as they don't reveal much finger prints.

The AR coating are more durable that we would think. It takes a good buffing to get it out. I agree though once it gets scratched, it won't look as good. I've seen excellent examples of Breitlings with ARs still in tact after 10 years. The bracelets are scuffed, but the ARs are not

Quote:

Originally Posted by SPACE-DWELLER

You're right, Vernon. But there are also disadvantages of an external AR coating. Firstly, the AR coating can easily get scratched, and once scratched it need a hole new AR treatment. Secondly, the AR coating is a smudge/fingerprint magnet.

Texsubmariner · 26 January 2008, 05:34 AM

For me, I like inside AR coating best, and wish Rolex would do the same. My Omega SMP with curved crystal and one side AR looks great, the best of both worlds. However, AR on both sides is a definite turn off for me. Makes the watch less of a "tool". I wonder why Omega changed direction with the PO in regard to this? Are they trying to copy Breitling?

roadcarver · 26 January 2008, 06:07 AM

Could be consumer requests?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Texsubmariner

For me, I like inside AR coating best, and wish Rolex would do the same. My Omega SMP with curved crystal and one side AR looks great, the best of both worlds. However, AR on both sides is a definite turn off for me. Makes the watch less of a "tool". I wonder why Omega changed direction with the PO in regard to this? Are they trying to copy Breitling?

gan1hck · 26 January 2008, 08:12 AM

I picked up my PO Chronograph 7 days ago....I got the one with the Orange bezel and pushers.

It is HUGE....makes by Sea-Dweller look like a child's watch.

So far, I LOVE it.

AFter one day, the size is no longer an issue....It looks right at home on my wrist.

The Lume is Terrific...much better than my rolex

Keeps time a +0.5 sec/day.

Bracelet is leaps and bounds better than my Sea Dweller.

Texsubmariner · 26 January 2008, 08:15 AM

Omega really makes terrific bracelets and lume! No doubt about that...

gan1hck · 26 January 2008, 08:21 AM

My wrist is a little over 7 inches...I know...girlish.

Perdu · 26 January 2008, 09:07 AM

Some owners take the AR treatment off the outer side of the crystal.

gan1hck · 26 January 2008, 09:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Perdu

Some owners take the AR treatment off the outer side of the crystal.

how do you do that

SPACE-DWELLER · 26 January 2008, 09:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gan1hck

how do you do that

I seem to remember having read here that you can use PolyWatch paste for that (the paste you'd normally use to remove scratches from plexi crystals). Apparantly, PW would not scratch the sapphire crystal itself but would remove the AR coating.

Texsubmariner · 26 January 2008, 12:26 PM

I read somewhere on this board that you do have to be very careful, and tape up the bezel. Also scrub very hard. I think you can do a search for that specific thread, maybe it's about 2 months old.

Texsubmariner · 26 January 2008, 12:26 PM

[QUOTE=gan1hck;431695]My wrist is a little over 7 inches...I know...girlish.

Nice watch, but too big for my wrist.

J. Martin Tensuan · 29 January 2008, 08:32 PM

I've read other reviews of the PO and have come across some that scoff at its inner and outer AR coating. One review, which says the outer AR coating is prone to scratching, actually shows photos of the PO's crystal turning blue under certain lighting conditions.

The size (45.5 mm -- albeit there is a 42 mm version) is a matter of taste and is something one can easily get used to. I got a 45.5 mm chronometer last year. It's the big daddy of my collection in terms of size and weight (compared to my other timepieces) but is still a joy to wear. I also have an Explorer II, Speedmaster, Carrera Twin Time and Series 2000 (I have other watches, too, but won't mention them as I only use these and my PO nowadays) so the size and weight of the PO is noticeable. Needless to say, the Explorer II, which I acquired only very recently, is my favorite!!!

Redleg · 8 March 2008, 12:19 PM

I have had mine for about 8 months and LOVE it! I hve never owned a watch this accurate, about 2 sec a week!

vukotab · 25 March 2008, 10:10 AM

Beautiful watch,too big for my taste,but beautiful indeed.

daunwaun · 25 March 2008, 01:36 PM

Great info guys!!

mickeydainish · 13 June 2008, 09:41 PM

I love the size of that PO... awsome watch! :-) :-)

Perdu · 27 July 2008, 11:58 AM

I don't like chronos but I think Omega have done a great job with the PO range.

25 January 2008, 05:51 PM	#1
SPACE-DWELLER "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Real Name: Bo Location: Denmark Watch: Rolex, of course! Posts: 22,436	OMEGA Planet Ocean chronograph Recently, I tried on the Omega PO chrono (ref. 2910.50.81 on omega.ch.). Is it just me, or is this watch VERY big?! I have owned the IWC Doppelchronograph, but the Omega PO makes the IWC DC seem like a ladies' watch! Anyway, I kinda like the Omega OP chrono, and might buy one some day........on a rubber strap, though. One tiny thing that disturbes the dial design, IMHO, is the subdial at six o' clock that is smaller than the two others. But I love the curved sapphire crystal. Is it AR coated on BOTH sides? I hope not! But the Omega website does not state anything about it. Also, the black part of the chrono buttons: What is it made of?? Does anyone here own that watch? I would appreciate your thoughts on it! __________________ With kind regards, Bo LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw...

25 January 2008, 07:09 PM	#2
Genevapics "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: Andre Location: Delaware Watch: Submariner Posts: 296	The Planet Ocean Chronograph... ... IS coated on both sides with the AR. I know many Omega owners that wished it was just on the inside of the watch. __________________ *–Andre´*

25 January 2008, 07:23 PM	#3
SPACE-DWELLER "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Real Name: Bo Location: Denmark Watch: Rolex, of course! Posts: 22,436	Yeah, I thought so! That's a shame! __________________ With kind regards, Bo LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw...

25 January 2008, 10:17 PM	#5
roadcarver "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2006 Real Name: Vernon Location: C-a-n-a-d-a Watch: 16600 Posts: 5,641	IMHO, AR coating on both sides makes a huge difference. The glare is not as prominent. __________________ I'm just a cook...

25 January 2008, 11:46 PM	#6
SPACE-DWELLER "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Real Name: Bo Location: Denmark Watch: Rolex, of course! Posts: 22,436	You're right, Vernon. But there are also disadvantages of an external AR coating. Firstly, the AR coating can easily get scratched, and once scratched it need a hole new AR treatment. Secondly, the AR coating is a smudge/fingerprint magnet. __________________ With kind regards, Bo LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw...

26 January 2008, 05:34 AM	#8
Texsubmariner "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Real Name: Khanh Location: Texas Watch: SSGMTc Posts: 1,227	For me, I like inside AR coating best, and wish Rolex would do the same. My Omega SMP with curved crystal and one side AR looks great, the best of both worlds. However, AR on both sides is a definite turn off for me. Makes the watch less of a "tool". I wonder why Omega changed direction with the PO in regard to this? Are they trying to copy Breitling? __________________ Sea Dweller M series SS GMT IIc M series Omega SMP Electric Blue Dial Wife's SS WG MOP Ladies DJ Z series

26 January 2008, 08:12 AM	#10
gan1hck "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: alabama Posts: 67	I picked up my PO Chronograph 7 days ago....I got the one with the Orange bezel and pushers. It is HUGE....makes by Sea-Dweller look like a child's watch. So far, I LOVE it. AFter one day, the size is no longer an issue....It looks right at home on my wrist. The Lume is Terrific...much better than my rolex Keeps time a +0.5 sec/day. Bracelet is leaps and bounds better than my Sea Dweller.

26 January 2008, 08:15 AM	#11
Texsubmariner "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Real Name: Khanh Location: Texas Watch: SSGMTc Posts: 1,227	Omega really makes terrific bracelets and lume! No doubt about that... __________________ Sea Dweller M series SS GMT IIc M series Omega SMP Electric Blue Dial Wife's SS WG MOP Ladies DJ Z series

26 January 2008, 08:21 AM	#12
gan1hck "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: alabama Posts: 67	My wrist is a little over 7 inches...I know...girlish.

26 January 2008, 09:07 AM	#13
Perdu "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Real Name: Gary Location: GMT-6 Watch: GMT Posts: 3,350	Some owners take the AR treatment off the outer side of the crystal. __________________ Omega Seamaster 300M GMT Noire Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra 8500 Benson 1937 Sterling Silver Hunter

26 January 2008, 12:26 PM	#16
Texsubmariner "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Real Name: Khanh Location: Texas Watch: SSGMTc Posts: 1,227	I read somewhere on this board that you do have to be very careful, and tape up the bezel. Also scrub very hard. I think you can do a search for that specific thread, maybe it's about 2 months old. __________________ Sea Dweller M series SS GMT IIc M series Omega SMP Electric Blue Dial Wife's SS WG MOP Ladies DJ Z series

29 January 2008, 08:32 PM	#18
J. Martin Tensuan Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Philippines Posts: 92	I've read other reviews of the PO and have come across some that scoff at its inner and outer AR coating. One review, which says the outer AR coating is prone to scratching, actually shows photos of the PO's crystal turning blue under certain lighting conditions. The size (45.5 mm -- albeit there is a 42 mm version) is a matter of taste and is something one can easily get used to. I got a 45.5 mm chronometer last year. It's the big daddy of my collection in terms of size and weight (compared to my other timepieces) but is still a joy to wear. I also have an Explorer II, Speedmaster, Carrera Twin Time and Series 2000 (I have other watches, too, but won't mention them as I only use these and my PO nowadays) so the size and weight of the PO is noticeable. Needless to say, the Explorer II, which I acquired only very recently, is my favorite!!!

8 March 2008, 12:19 PM	#19
Redleg "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: SE AZ Posts: 4	I love mine! I have had mine for about 8 months and LOVE it! I hve never owned a watch this accurate, about 2 sec a week!

25 March 2008, 10:10 AM	#20
vukotab "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Real Name: Vukota Brajovi Location: Belgrade,Serbia Watch: ing movies! Posts: 3,812	Beautiful watch,too big for my taste,but beautiful indeed.

25 March 2008, 01:36 PM	#21
daunwaun "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Real Name: Ken Location: toronto Watch: 18K YG Day Date Posts: 2,985	Great info guys!! __________________ DAUNWAUN

13 June 2008, 09:41 PM	#22
mickeydainish Banned Join Date: Mar 2008 Real Name: Michael Location: LaLa Land Watch: Sub Date 16610 Posts: 1,757	I love the size of that PO... awsome watch! :-) :-)

27 July 2008, 11:58 AM	#23
Perdu "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Real Name: Gary Location: GMT-6 Watch: GMT Posts: 3,350	I don't like chronos but I think Omega have done a great job with the PO range. __________________ Omega Seamaster 300M GMT Noire Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra 8500 Benson 1937 Sterling Silver Hunter

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)