ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

RolexExplor · 31 August 2013, 12:32 PM

how does everyone feel about the smaller clasp on the ex 2?
i have always preferred the longer submariner version so on my old and new ex 2 i had them switch it to the longer

joe100 · 31 August 2013, 02:05 PM

It's a clasp. Works well. The Sub clasp is thick and doesn't fit as well in my opinion.

watchwatcher · 1 September 2013, 12:02 AM

I'm probably in the minority, but I actually prefer the easy link clasp on the EXP/GMT/DJII line.

TimeOnMyHands · 1 September 2013, 01:28 AM

As long as it is comfortable on your wrist and your eyes!

FTX I · 1 September 2013, 01:49 AM

I agree with the OP and do not like it as well. I have started a thread about the Sub clasp asking why its not standard and I really mean it and the Exp and Gmt are ruled out because of the clasp. Alright to be fair I dont need the Gmt function so blaming the clasp is easy.

RolexPete · 1 September 2013, 02:09 AM

Doesn't bother me in the least.

31 August 2013, 12:32 PM	#1
RolexExplor Banned Join Date: Aug 2012 Location: florida Posts: 346	small clasp on explorer 2 how does everyone feel about the smaller clasp on the ex 2? i have always preferred the longer submariner version so on my old and new ex 2 i had them switch it to the longer

31 August 2013, 02:05 PM	#2
joe100 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Real Name: Joe Location: New Mexico Watch: Explorer Posts: 12,840	It's a clasp. Works well. The Sub clasp is thick and doesn't fit as well in my opinion. __________________ It's Espresso, not Expresso. Coffee is not a train in Italy. -TRF Member 6982-

1 September 2013, 02:09 AM	#6
RolexPete "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Real Name: Peter Location: Massachusetts Watch: 214270 Mk2 Posts: 1,963	Doesn't bother me in the least. __________________ 2016 Explorer 214270 Mk2 - 1996 Submariner 14060* - 1972 Datejust 1601 1972 Oyster Perpetual 1002 - 1978 Oysterquartz 17000 Omega Seamaster 2265.80 - Omega Seamaster 300 166.0324 *RIP PAL 1942-2015

1 September 2013, 12:02 AM	#3
watchwatcher "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Larry Location: Kentucky Watch: Yes Posts: 35,196	I'm probably in the minority, but I actually prefer the easy link clasp on the EXP/GMT/DJII line.

1 September 2013, 01:28 AM	#4
TimeOnMyHands Banned Join Date: Oct 2012 Location: Canada Watch: 16570 Posts: 457	As long as it is comfortable on your wrist and your eyes!

1 September 2013, 01:49 AM	#5
FTX I "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2013 Real Name: Flavio Location: N/A Posts: 14,654	I agree with the OP and do not like it as well. I have started a thread about the Sub clasp asking why its not standard and I really mean it and the Exp and Gmt are ruled out because of the clasp. Alright to be fair I dont need the Gmt function so blaming the clasp is easy.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)