ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

AK797 · 14 September 2013, 04:43 PM

Both are popular here, so just a straight up which do you prefer.

solesman · 14 September 2013, 06:36 PM

No date for me. It will be the one I pick up. If they did a hulk no date I would choose that over the black though.

kamek · 14 September 2013, 06:43 PM

Date

Cc1966 · 14 September 2013, 06:47 PM

Date

capote · 14 September 2013, 07:06 PM

14060m no date for sure

Jack T · 14 September 2013, 07:32 PM

I bought what I like, I like what I have, and voted accordingly.

Vincent65 · 14 September 2013, 07:35 PM

with date

Planet E. · 14 September 2013, 08:20 PM

I chose with date. Date is useful.

PanosI · 14 September 2013, 08:22 PM

No date Ceramic, Date non Ceramic

OrangeSport · 14 September 2013, 08:28 PM

No date. More balanced and no cyclops.

mjclark32 · 14 September 2013, 08:38 PM

Date for me

bsandiford · 14 September 2013, 08:39 PM

No date. You don't need to know the date 600 meters under water

bsandiford · 14 September 2013, 08:39 PM

.....and it makes for a perfectly balanced dial

Bangel · 14 September 2013, 09:07 PM

Date.

cop414 · 14 September 2013, 09:09 PM

This timeless classic...

Cesium133 · 14 September 2013, 09:36 PM

I vote for the date, but I agree with others that the no date has a clean look to it. Unfortunately, after looking 1,000,000 pictures of a Sub with date and a cyclops, the most talked about watch in the world, I've been brainwashed into thinking a Sub should have it.

travisb · 14 September 2013, 09:40 PM

I voted date.
The balance and lines of the ND are flawless though.

Roller07 · 14 September 2013, 09:52 PM

I wish there was a choice of liking both equally.

Jack T · 14 September 2013, 09:57 PM

I wonder if the poll results are reflective of ownership. Sub Date must outsell by a very wide margin.

Racerdj · 14 September 2013, 10:01 PM

Date

crowncollection · 14 September 2013, 10:03 PM

Date

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - now Free

1William · 14 September 2013, 10:17 PM

Have owned several sub date watches but currently have the Sub-C ND and love it.

samsmart · 14 September 2013, 10:18 PM

I love my No Date, but I do find myself looking down at my wrist for the date when I wear it.

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk 2

rolio · 14 September 2013, 10:37 PM

I've always liked the sub w/date. Something about that bubble that makes it everything. Go figure

Rex22 · 14 September 2013, 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by solesman

no date for me. It will be the one i pick up. If they did a hulk no date i would choose that over the black though.

x2

Art 1 · 14 September 2013, 10:40 PM

Neither. Unless you can add it the LV.

Stellite · 14 September 2013, 10:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by solesman

No date for me. It will be the one I pick up. If they did a hulk no date I would choose that over the black though.

A No date green dial would be my dream.

samsmart · 14 September 2013, 10:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1William

Have owned several sub date watches but currently have the Sub-C ND and love it.

Thats is my next non date purchase. Love the ceramic. I wore my buddy's 116610 for a few hours yesterday. That ceramic looks so different depending on the lighting. Always changing.

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk 2

eeh100773 · 14 September 2013, 11:05 PM

Another Sub v Sub Date thread. I'll play along.

Presa canary · 14 September 2013, 11:11 PM

Sans

View Poll Results: Which do you prefer?
Sub date	161	55.14%
Sub no date	131	44.86%
Voters: 292. You may not vote on this poll

14 September 2013, 04:43 PM	#1
AK797 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Neil Location: UK Watch: ing ships roll in Posts: 59,369	Poll: Sub date v Sub no date Both are popular here, so just a straight up which do you prefer.

14 September 2013, 06:47 PM	#4
Cc1966 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2013 Real Name: Christopher Location: Georgia, USA Watch: ing the Sea... Posts: 6,713	Date __________________ "I wish to have no Connection with any Ship that does not Sail fast for I intend to go in harm's way." Captain John Paul Jones, 16 November 1778 "*Curmudgeons* " Favorites: 1665 SD, Sub Date, DSSD, Exp II, Sub LV, GMTIIc

14 September 2013, 07:32 PM	#6
Jack T "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2013 Real Name: Jack Location: The Triangle Watch: Several Posts: 6,738	I bought what I like, I like what I have, and voted accordingly. Attached Images __________________ Sub 116613 LN; GMT 116710 LN; Sinn 104R; Exp 214270; GS SBGM221; Omega AT

14 September 2013, 08:28 PM	#10
OrangeSport "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2011 Real Name: Jason Location: Essex, UK Watch: 14060M Posts: 2,943	No date. More balanced and no cyclops. __________________

14 September 2013, 06:36 PM	#2
solesman "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: UK Posts: 529	No date for me. It will be the one I pick up. If they did a hulk no date I would choose that over the black though.

14 September 2013, 06:43 PM	#3
kamek "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2012 Real Name: Brian Location: NYC Posts: 534	Date

14 September 2013, 07:06 PM	#5
capote "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2010 Real Name: Daniel Location: Sweden Watch: 16570 Posts: 7,315	14060m no date for sure

14 September 2013, 07:35 PM	#7
Vincent65 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2012 Location: Switzerland Posts: 14,298	with date

14 September 2013, 08:20 PM	#8
Planet E. Member Join Date: Aug 2013 Location: Asia Posts: 23	I chose with date. Date is useful.

14 September 2013, 08:22 PM	#9
PanosI 2025 Pledge Member Join Date: May 2008 Real Name: Panos Location: Athens, Greece Watch: 16710 Posts: 8,705	No date Ceramic, Date non Ceramic

14 September 2013, 08:38 PM	#11
mjclark32 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Real Name: MJC Location: PHL USA Watch: IWC, Rolex, AP Posts: 29,232	Date for me __________________

14 September 2013, 08:39 PM	#12
bsandiford "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2012 Location: Sydney Posts: 55	No date. You don't need to know the date 600 meters under water

14 September 2013, 09:07 PM	#14
Bangel "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2011 Location: Australia Watch: 116610LN Posts: 15,802	Date.

14 September 2013, 09:09 PM	#15
cop414 TRF Moderator & 2025 Titanium Yacht-Master Patron Join Date: Apr 2012 Real Name: Tim Location: Pennsylvania Watch: 14060M Posts: 72,873	This timeless classic... Attached Images __________________ Rolex Submariner 14060M Omega Seamaster 2254.50 DOXA Professional 1200T Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons TRF's "After Dark" Bar & Night Club Patron P Club Member #17 2 FA ENABLED

14 September 2013, 09:36 PM	#16
Cesium133 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2012 Location: USA Posts: 2,037	I vote for the date, but I agree with others that the no date has a clean look to it. Unfortunately, after looking 1,000,000 pictures of a Sub with date and a cyclops, the most talked about watch in the world, I've been brainwashed into thinking a Sub should have it.

14 September 2013, 09:40 PM	#17
travisb "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Real Name: Travis Location: FL / NYC Watch: Yes.. Posts: 33,881	I voted date. The balance and lines of the ND are flawless though.

14 September 2013, 09:52 PM	#18
Roller07 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2012 Location: GMT -5 Watch: HulkPepsiCoke Posts: 2,364	I wish there was a choice of liking both equally.

14 September 2013, 09:57 PM	#19
Jack T "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2013 Real Name: Jack Location: The Triangle Watch: Several Posts: 6,738	I wonder if the poll results are reflective of ownership. Sub Date must outsell by a very wide margin. __________________ Sub 116613 LN; GMT 116710 LN; Sinn 104R; Exp 214270; GS SBGM221; Omega AT

14 September 2013, 10:01 PM	#20
Racerdj "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2013 Location: Indianapolis Watch: Patek-Philippe Posts: 16,832	Date __________________ Rolex and Patek Philippe

14 September 2013, 10:03 PM	#21
crowncollection "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Real Name: David Location: australia Posts: 20,247	Date Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - now Free __________________ watches many

14 September 2013, 10:17 PM	#22
1William 2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: North Carolina Watch: Rolex/Others Posts: 48,766	Have owned several sub date watches but currently have the Sub-C ND and love it. Attached Images

14 September 2013, 10:18 PM	#23
samsmart "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2013 Real Name: sam Location: Dallas, TX Watch: Me Tint Posts: 3,777	I love my No Date, but I do find myself looking down at my wrist for the date when I wear it. Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk 2 Attached Images

14 September 2013, 10:37 PM	#24
rolio "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Real Name: justRay Location: Back2California Watch: Birdies Posts: 1,921	I've always liked the sub w/date. Something about that bubble that makes it everything. Go figure __________________ JJ "Tranquil? Just wait till I get started!! LOL! LOL!" --JJ Rolex~By way of an extraordinary life, and all the simple pleasures it has to offer~

14 September 2013, 10:40 PM	#26
Art 1 Banned Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Florida, Canada Watch: Rol/Seik/Tud/Omega Posts: 30,244	Neither. Unless you can add it the LV.

14 September 2013, 11:05 PM	#29
eeh100773 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2012 Real Name: "Fast" Eddie Location: Asbury Park NJ Watch: 14060 T Series '96 Posts: 1,482	Another Sub v Sub Date thread. I'll play along. Attached Images

14 September 2013, 11:11 PM	#30
Presa canary "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2012 Real Name: Justin Location: Pa Watch: Explorer ii Posts: 3,155	Sans

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)