ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
16 December 2013, 01:35 AM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Canada
Posts: 34
|
Pepsi ... "Right Now"
Incoming ... 1972 Rolex GMT 1675
I've been searching for a vintage pepsi in excellent condition for some time now and recently came across this one at a local jeweler that specializes in vintage and estate watches. It has a red stripe service sticker on the caseback but appears to be all original. Any feedback you can provide would be greatly appreciated. |
16 December 2013, 01:46 AM | #3 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Rob
Location: Parrish fl.
Watch: Tt datejust 16233
Posts: 20,952
|
Love it!
__________________
Rolex Omega Tag Heuer |
16 December 2013, 01:48 AM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: CO
Watch: BLNR Hotness
Posts: 153
|
That's a real beauty, congrats!
|
16 December 2013, 02:22 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: London
Posts: 1,894
|
I think that swing tag looks a bit faded - best that you pass
Btw please send me the contact details for your local jeweller On a serious note - it looks awesome |
16 December 2013, 02:27 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Kenny
Location: northern ireland
Watch: SDs, Subs & GMTs
Posts: 5,136
|
Looks very nice indeed!
|
16 December 2013, 03:00 AM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: NYC
Watch: '85 1680, AP RO
Posts: 148
|
Sweet!
|
16 December 2013, 03:15 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,654
|
Awesome!
|
16 December 2013, 04:27 AM | #9 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,419
|
They look better with age. Really nice!
|
16 December 2013, 04:34 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Real Name: Steve
Location: Grand Junction CO
Watch: A few, not enough.
Posts: 1,725
|
Great looking 1675. I'd be surprised if that insert is original but who cares. The hands and dial seem to match and look great. Congrats on a great find.
|
16 December 2013, 05:31 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Andreas
Location: Margaritaville
Watch: Smurf
Posts: 19,879
|
Nice one.
__________________
Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man. |
16 December 2013, 05:35 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Alex
Location: Sydney, Australia
Watch: Idiot Savant
Posts: 1,944
|
Bottom lugs look to be different lengths. Bezel a bit worn.
But that's a pretty bad pic, hard to tell for sure. Bracelet looks to be stretched. |
16 December 2013, 05:58 AM | #13 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 26,846
|
Very nice
|
16 December 2013, 07:50 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: North Carolina
Watch: 16622
Posts: 1,097
|
Great example for the ref. Can't go wrong with a Pepsi!
|
16 December 2013, 09:35 AM | #15 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Canada
Posts: 34
|
Thanks for all the feedback ... I love this forum! Here is a wrist shot. You can see the lugs are equal length and are flush with the end links. When held out, there's little to no bow in the bracelet and the clasp is very tight when snapping it on. The watch appears to be hardly worn which is why I'm hoping the bezel appears to be too fresh. I hope it will fade to a cool ice blue color with wear. The only signs of age I can see are the patina on the hands and markers and the dial has a very slight brown/tropical tinge to it. Can anyone confirm the dial variation ... MK2?
Thanks again! |
16 December 2013, 09:47 AM | #16 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,794
|
Stunning.
__________________
_______________________ |
16 December 2013, 10:21 AM | #17 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Canada
Posts: 34
|
Dial Variation ... MK2?
|
16 December 2013, 10:24 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,075
|
Do the minute, hour and second hands glow? Nothing wrong with replaced lumina hands, but it bothers some folks.
|
16 December 2013, 10:27 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: George
Location: Athens, Greece
Watch: es --> A lot !
Posts: 2,327
|
Hands and bezel look very "shiny". Maybe they are replacements.
If you buy and pay for a vintage, have them checked. If you buy just a nice GMT, then you got a bargain, but for the good order sake, have a look inside as well.
__________________
Rolex owner since 1971. 5513 and 16700 the loved ones. DJ WG Jubilee 16170 for wife - U series Oyster Perpetual WG 177234 for daughter V-series |
16 December 2013, 10:40 AM | #20 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Canada
Posts: 34
|
Great advice guys! I can't believe I didn't check. It guess it's so easy to get caught up in the moment.
|
16 December 2013, 11:16 AM | #21 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2013
Real Name: John Williams
Location: Alaska outback
Watch: GMT
Posts: 1,051
|
Looks new old stock. Great ticker no matter what it costs.
|
16 December 2013, 11:32 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Rick
Location: London, Ont.
Posts: 666
|
Big congrats looks like a beauty.
|
16 December 2013, 11:44 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: MDangerSteel
Location: Canada
Watch: Vintage Rolex
Posts: 2,301
|
Not to raise any concerns, but that second hand looks a bit off to me.The luminous circle should just touch the tip of the hour hand.
Is this fron Darlor by chance?
__________________
Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons Probability of survival is inversely proportional to the angle of arrival---Capt. Rage Don't believe anything in aviation, 'till V1---Mitch Danger Steel |
16 December 2013, 11:57 AM | #24 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,308
|
The seconds hand is genuine and the correct length. The 16750 GMT seconds hand was shorter. (The aftermarket seconds hands do not taper from the tritium circle to the tip like on a genuine hand.) Additionally, when the tritium circle from the seconds hand crosses over the hour hand, it should cross over the middle of the tip of the hour hand like on this watch. All the hands appear to be genuine Rolex.
The dial is a Mark II circa 1971. The bezel insert is a Rolex replacement but so are most bezel inserts on 40-year-old watches. The green hang tag does not belong to the watch and if the red tag has a hologram, it does not belong either. Enjoy your watch, it appears to be in great condition for the age.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics. |
16 December 2013, 12:07 PM | #25 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Canada
Posts: 34
|
Quote:
Cool! Good to know. In that case, assuming MitchSteel is right about the luminous ball on the second hand just touching the tip of the hour hand, could the hour hand be a replacement? Do you know if they vary from the original? |
|
16 December 2013, 12:13 PM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Pete
Location: Arizona
Watch: ing Duke bball
Posts: 1,488
|
As usual John is dead on! The only thing that bothers me, and it could be my eyes, but the hour and minute hand appear to be luminova, or they do not match the plots, second and GMT hand.
|
16 December 2013, 12:13 PM | #27 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Canada
Posts: 34
|
Yeah, the jeweler places random hang tags on all their used rolex watches. There are no box/papers. The sticker on the caseback is clear with the exception of a red line ... no hologram. Thanks again for your time and feedback.
|
16 December 2013, 12:14 PM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: MDangerSteel
Location: Canada
Watch: Vintage Rolex
Posts: 2,301
|
Im not claiming to be an expert on vintage Rolex by any means, but what I wrote earlier was a polite way of saying, the hands were replacement.I may be wrong, and YES, the hands can be replaced of course.Now, look, if it is a good deal, I would NOT turn it down, just because the hands are off.The rest of the watch looks good, maybe you've got a swinging deal on that unit, if that's the case, good on ya mate
Just my thoughts
__________________
Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons Probability of survival is inversely proportional to the angle of arrival---Capt. Rage Don't believe anything in aviation, 'till V1---Mitch Danger Steel |
16 December 2013, 12:15 PM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: MDangerSteel
Location: Canada
Watch: Vintage Rolex
Posts: 2,301
|
Is this from Darlor?
__________________
Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons Probability of survival is inversely proportional to the angle of arrival---Capt. Rage Don't believe anything in aviation, 'till V1---Mitch Danger Steel |
16 December 2013, 12:26 PM | #30 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Canada
Posts: 34
|
Thanks! I appreciate all input. I now suspect that the minute and hour hands may be replacements or as one member put it, "new old stock" ... love it! Having said that, it seems strange that they would need replacing when everything else appears to be original and in good shape, no? Do you know if this is not uncommon? |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.