ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
1 February 2014, 01:59 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Real Name: Dan
Location: NYC
Posts: 807
|
Identifying production year with clasp code
I have never tried to determine the production year of a piece I own until now. I'm trying to determine it without removing the bracelet to check the case serial number, but through the clasp code. I know this method may not be as accurate since it tells the production date of the clasp itself, but all I need is a ballpark date. The code reads "S6", therefore is it safe to assume this falls somewhere in the 1994 timeframe?
I'm having problems trying to upload a pic, but it's a 16628 YM YG with outer lugholes for the pushpins. |
1 February 2014, 02:09 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Michigan USA
Watch: Rolex & Omega 4 Me
Posts: 1,685
|
Assuming the bracelet is original to the watch the production date on the clasp should match the watch serial. More or less...
You can find a guide to clasp production codes on this site. http://oysterworld.de/ |
1 February 2014, 02:39 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Real Name: Dan
Location: NYC
Posts: 807
|
Yes, I'm pretty sure the bracelet is the original. I did not see any codes ending with a S which would denote a service bracelet replacement.
|
1 February 2014, 03:08 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: San Diego
Watch: Sub-C blue, DSSD
Posts: 2,482
|
I have read on here (from Padi56?) that the case, and bracelet years can be way off. They are both produced and stamped is mass production, stored, and then assembled at another time down the road when needed.
|
1 February 2014, 11:21 AM | #5 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,490
|
Since the Yachtmaster YG only came out in 1992, your guess of around '94 for the bracelet is probably a good one and it is likely original.. Those bracelets are simply too expensive to replace on such a young watch.
We have all the codes you need in our Reference Library.. You don't need to go anyplace else..
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
1 February 2014, 11:48 AM | #6 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,780
|
The only bracelet clasps that don't seem to be year-coded (from 1976 onwards) are the integrated Oysterquartz bracelets. Mine, and many others that I have seen, are stamped GC.
__________________
_______________________ |
1 February 2014, 07:32 PM | #7 | |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,022
|
Quote:
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
|
2 February 2014, 01:07 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Michigan USA
Watch: Rolex & Omega 4 Me
Posts: 1,685
|
The years match on both the case and bracelet for all 4 of my old style tuna can clasp Rolex watches. I was basing my statement on personal experience.
|
2 March 2016, 08:45 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NYC
Posts: 52
|
I know this is an older thread but I figured if started a new one I'd be told to search the existing threads!
Anyhow, I have a day-date yellow gold with a serial number from 1991 and a clasp code from 1993. It appears to be all original (consistent patina, no "s" mark on clasp, etc.). I am guessing it left the factory and was put into the stream of commerce in 1993 and is therefore a 1993. Is that reasonable or going against "Rolex dating convention" in that even if it didn't leave factory until 2 years after the case was made it's considered to be of the date the case was stamped? Thanks. |
2 March 2016, 09:19 AM | #10 | |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,780
|
Quote:
|
|
3 March 2016, 12:55 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NYC
Posts: 52
|
Sorry for delay just saw this. Not wearing watch now but believe first 2 are "X3 . . ."
Many thanks |
31 March 2016, 05:03 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Peter
Location: Massachusetts
Watch: 214270 Mk2
Posts: 1,963
|
That is 1991 production date...what is clasp code?
__________________
2016 Explorer 214270 Mk2 - 1996 Submariner 14060* - 1972 Datejust 1601 1972 Oyster Perpetual 1002 - 1978 Oysterquartz 17000 Omega Seamaster 2265.80 - Omega Seamaster 300 166.0324 *RIP PAL 1942-2015 |
1 September 2016, 12:04 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Trav
Location: singapore
Watch: it
Posts: 2,316
|
I have seen one x series 14060 case on a S code clasp.
1991 case vs 1994 clasp. I passed. |
1 September 2016, 02:30 AM | #14 | |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,490
|
Quote:
X serials were "first seen" in mid 1991 and extended easily into 1993. (It would have been impossible for Rolex to have suddenly built all X serials at once and all letter prefixes overlapped several years) The clues are all right there and it is most likely that the watch came out of the factory in 1993, as you surmised.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
|
2 September 2016, 12:10 AM | #15 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Trav
Location: singapore
Watch: it
Posts: 2,316
|
Quote:
Mystery. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.