ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
8 February 2014, 02:28 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Shaun
Location: Devonshire
Watch: SubND/D/LV
Posts: 651
|
How many 16610 LV vs 16610 LN out there?
Ok WE ALL KNOW that the Submariner 16610 is a MASS PRODUCED product and there are MILLIONS of them, but is there any accurate-ish production figures for each model to date? Rolex HQ at ST James's Sq in London told me that the LV was produced at a ratio of approximately 1:5 standard LN (black bezel) models.
The LN has been produced for approx 20 years (?) 10,000,000 of them?? The LV has been produced for approx 7 years (?) 1,000,000 of them?? Please experts lets workm out the figures!!! (PS. I still think my LV has a Maxi date wheel) |
8 February 2014, 05:45 AM | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 396
|
most will tell you it doesent matter because it was produced for 7 years (LV) and therefore their are all kinds of LVs floating around (there is).
However the 16610LV is much much much much rarer than a standard 16610LN 16610LV will always have a 'premium' over the 16610LN because why wouldent it? some will even tell you there is only one true 50th(2003). Thats horse feces. A 16610LV is a 16610LV no matter how someone will attemp to 'spin' it. The 116610LV 'ceramic' some will tell you its a 2nd gen 50th(its not) its just a green submariner. the differences between the 16610LV v.s 16610LN are well documented but the ONLY difference between a 116610LV and 116610LN is bezel, dial color (offtopic) |
8 February 2014, 07:50 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: GMT -5
Watch: HulkPepsiCoke
Posts: 2,364
|
Only Rolex knows the answer and there are not telling anyone.
|
8 February 2014, 08:06 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Real Name: Bruce Banner
Location: Dayton, OHIO
Watch: 116610LVc
Posts: 23
|
Buying a 116610LV D series 2011
I have just recently went gazing at 95% new Rolex's and the gentlemen at the store told me that has a 116610LV in stock and that it has a super rare Dial. It's a G series 2011 with the Ceramic Bezel and the Dial is the exact same colour as the Bezel.
Is that somehow Rare? Why is it Rare? It's 95% new he said. It was in the box looking so sweet. I tried it on and out came the down payment. Is 8500$ a good price? He had it listed at 9050$. I was thinking of going there with the 8500 in cash but laying down 8200 first. See what he says. Is that a fair price he's asking for ?? $8500$ ?? Oh he said that the watch was originally from a Canadian AD before he got it. I had never known that it made a difference what country the second hand Rolex's AD was originally from. He said that i could have problems with customs if i were to leave Canada and they to come back in. Customs would run the serial# and see what country the watches AD came from. And if it's outside of Canada you will ave to pay duty. CRAZY-NESS: |
8 February 2014, 08:21 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Shaun
Location: Devonshire
Watch: SubND/D/LV
Posts: 651
|
Ceramic LV is a completely different watch to the model discussed on this thread...
|
8 February 2014, 08:27 AM | #6 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: United States
Watch: Rolex, PP
Posts: 1,198
|
It's not rare. It is a great watch and you will love it. $9050 is what it costs brand new so if he had a used watch marked there thats overpriced. $8500 is a fair price I guess especially if it looks pristine and has all paperwork/still under warranty. I'd say 8k would be a fair price to pay.
Quote:
|
|
8 February 2014, 12:50 PM | #7 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Japan
Watch: ing your back.
Posts: 16,179
|
I can only speak for where I live. Japan. This thread is about the 16610 LV.
Here is Japan if you hunt around you can still find them but the premium is getting higher and higher. Finding one NIB is nearly impossible. |
8 February 2014, 06:18 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,023
|
If you want a really rare Rolex try finding one on the left hand winding Rolex now they are rare.What is rare today in my book something that's rare is a product produced in under a hundred world wide and not in there many thousands.No modern day Rolex is rare just some produced in lower numbers.And today the main reason that Rolex have changed to the new random case serial system is simply this.Since the single letter system started in 1987 Rolex have produced such a vast amount of watches they just ran out of single letter and number combinations.
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
8 February 2014, 11:49 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Florida Panhandle
Watch: Sub C LV,
Posts: 490
|
I would think more like $7500 for a used one.
|
8 February 2014, 11:56 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Real Name: Paul
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 14,578
|
A more reasoned guestimate for the total supply of 16610LV is 90,000 or so.
Hardly rare, though rarer than a 116520 due to the fewer years of production. |
9 February 2014, 12:14 AM | #11 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: BIG BEAR, CA
Posts: 1,468
|
Compared to the regular black and white sub, the LV is extremely rare. I would put my $$ on it any day over the regular sub. Every tom, dick and harry is wearing a regular sub but not the LV.
Also in the future, the LV would always command a greater premium than the non LV sub. |
9 February 2014, 03:25 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: LA
Watch: ND Sub
Posts: 371
|
I agree the LV will always command a premium over the LN.
To put a spin on the question, I probably see on average 2 16610LN watches being worn a week in the wild. Over the last 5 years, I've only seen 1 16610LV total. This just my observation, but I wonder if the LV is really that much rarer or if they are mostly in storage where the LNs are being used. |
9 February 2014, 03:26 AM | #13 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: BIG BEAR, CA
Posts: 1,468
|
Quote:
|
|
9 February 2014, 03:35 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,023
|
You should get out more then perhaps you would see more of these super rare LV watches rare my ars#.In today's world there are many many thousands of them around, and all the same apart from a few minor fonts and slight insert colour changes.
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
9 February 2014, 03:41 AM | #15 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida, Canada
Watch: Rol/Seik/Tud/Omega
Posts: 30,244
|
Interesting. I see them all the time. Have owned two myself. Steel Daytonas too, see them all the time. Had one of those too. In fact I see so many steel daytonas I would never buy another, for me, too common.
|
9 February 2014, 04:55 AM | #16 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dallas
Watch: 12800ft = 3900m
Posts: 11,173
|
Quote:
So there's two factors, preferability in the general public and limited production in both numbers and time. I know when I first saw one in the store I said wow cool, but....I quickly decided I really didn't like it. Fast forward a decade and now I like it, but I'm a wis now. As far as rarity....I have three co-workers who own one where I'm at, none of them are wis. It's not that rare, but as the years go on the internet and collectors will begin to generate hype as always....there's a nib here offered at double it's original price and more than a new LVc, I would consider that hype, but collectors and owners are like yeah thats right, its raaare, like stock brokers pushing a stock. |
|
9 February 2014, 05:15 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: BondJamesBond
Location: The Algarve
Watch: Rolex or nothing
Posts: 4,064
|
A few weeks ago, I hesitated between the LN and the LV, but finally took the LN because I don't like the maxi dial much. Now I bought a LV insert (on this forum) so I'll have the perfect LV soon.
__________________
♛ 5-digit Rolex or nothing ♛ |
9 February 2014, 08:42 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Shaun
Location: Devonshire
Watch: SubND/D/LV
Posts: 651
|
Some interesting points made - but some people still hack on about the LV being rare - It is compared to say an Omega Seamaster, but isn't because of its mass production - 90,000 of them out there approximately...
Thanks for all your discussions.. Shaun (OP) |
9 February 2014, 08:56 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Georgian
Location: Constanta_Romania
Watch: 216570 Polar
Posts: 904
|
This watch is not rare! You can find 8 submariners 16610 lv for sale on watchfinder.co.uk
|
9 February 2014, 09:56 AM | #20 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 622
|
Quote:
The Sub LV is special, the maxi dial made the excellent Submariner the perfect Sub and the fact that you can add a Black bezel to the LV for a different look adds to the attraction. It will be interesting to see which versions of the LV become most sought after in years to come, the early versions will always be the most popular but my preference is for the later versions with the RRR on the rehaut which were only around for a few years. |
|
9 February 2014, 10:03 AM | #21 | |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida, Canada
Watch: Rol/Seik/Tud/Omega
Posts: 30,244
|
Quote:
|
|
9 February 2014, 12:49 PM | #22 | |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Japan
Watch: ing your back.
Posts: 16,179
|
Quote:
|
|
9 February 2014, 05:29 PM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Shaun
Location: Devonshire
Watch: SubND/D/LV
Posts: 651
|
My original question on this post was to try and find out an approximate production number of LVs (50th anniversary LV...NOT Ceramic LV) compared to the more common 16610 black bezel model. So far, someone has posted a figure of 90,000LVs so here is the maths; LVs made at a rate of one fifth of the LN for a third of the time;
90,000 X 5 X 3 = 135000 LNs Approximate production numbers: Approximate number of 16610 LV = 90,000 Approximate number of 16610 LN = 1,350,000 |
9 February 2014, 05:38 PM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Shaun
Location: Devonshire
Watch: SubND/D/LV
Posts: 651
|
WOW - If you devide 1,350,000 by 90,000 you get exactly 15 meaning that there are approximately 1 LV for every 15 LN....
|
9 February 2014, 05:42 PM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Al
Location: USA
Posts: 1,546
|
No offense but i dont think this thread is going to go anywhere.I ,for one, would love to know the answer to your question, but as we all know on TRF, Rolex is a privately held company that has no obligation, inclination, or desire to share any production numbers on specific models.The only number they have ever released in regards to production is to COSC to get the annual certifications on all of that year's gross inventory. Any guess would be pure speculation.
|
9 February 2014, 05:48 PM | #26 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,474
|
I don't know how many they made.
But I know where two of them are.
__________________
E |
9 February 2014, 05:49 PM | #27 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,474
|
Quote:
Having a good weekend?
__________________
E |
|
9 February 2014, 06:29 PM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Real Name: Marcus
Location: Melbourne, Aus
Watch: 114060 SubC
Posts: 180
|
|
9 February 2014, 06:42 PM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: The Netherlands
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 209
|
All Rolex products are mass produced these days. So are the 16610 LN and LV.
It doesnt affect any value in tue future, as they will never become rare. Rolex made perfection available for everyone, to its totally not exclusive. If you want to buy a watch thats exclusive, you should consider another brand. For me Rolex is special, because its the only one who kept independant during the quartz crisis. They could manage that because of the large production numbers. |
10 February 2014, 12:16 PM | #30 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Japan
Watch: ing your back.
Posts: 16,179
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.