ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Burrost1 · 15 March 2014, 06:44 AM

Hi Guys,

What do you think??

http://www.ukspecialistwatches.co.uk...-vintage-1966/

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/3011206134...84.m1423.l2649

Same watch on ebay!

As always your thoughts appreciated!

Stuart

Vincent65 · 15 March 2014, 08:20 AM

incorrect insert

Burrost1 · 15 March 2014, 08:37 AM

Apart from that? correct dial for age? hands etc..? Does price seem excessive?

Old Expat Beast · 15 March 2014, 09:05 AM

Overpriced. Do you ever check the For Sale section here? All the watches you post for us to verify seem to come from other sites.

landroverking · 15 March 2014, 10:37 AM

Mods plz move to vintage.

Burrost1 · 15 March 2014, 06:43 PM

Very few come up for sale on here which is why I was posted external ones, I've put a wanted ad up but as yet no reply!
Thanks as always!

Old Expat Beast · 15 March 2014, 07:44 PM

I see you have asked for a 1680 but not a 5513. Type 5513 in the search field in the For Sale section..there's quite a few in there, and they come up often.

Burrost1 · 15 March 2014, 08:00 PM

I need to add that I'm as well!! Thanks!

Mark020 · 15 March 2014, 08:27 PM

Way too expensive

Beaumont Miller II · 15 March 2014, 11:52 PM

Incorrect dial. Should be a gilt gloss or meters first matte dial. Very pricey.

ROGERB · 16 March 2014, 12:59 AM

So early 66 based on the serial is not likely accurate despite what Rolex UK may have stated, the case back, bezel, insert and dial and hands are likely a service replacement as well as the band. The serial number puts the watch in the forth quarter of 1967 and would have come with a meters first dial. However the watch looks great, just overpriced for what it truly is.
IMHO

R

lupus · 16 March 2014, 04:58 AM

nice case.

drsven · 16 March 2014, 07:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ROGERB

So early 66 based on the serial is not likely accurate despite what Rolex UK may have stated, the case back, bezel, insert and dial and hands are likely a service replacement as well as the band. The serial number puts the watch in the forth quarter of 1967 and would have come with a meters first dial. However the watch looks great, just overpriced for what it truly is.
IMHO

R

I'm curious, is it best to date these watches based on the case serial number or the date on the case back? Reason I ask is because I recently saw a meters first 5513 with a 1.9M serial number, but the case back was stamped 68.

Burrost1 · 16 March 2014, 10:21 AM

What would a 'good' price for this watch be as it's a very attractive looking watch!

Thanks for all your comments!

Old Expat Beast · 16 March 2014, 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Burrost1

What would a 'good' price for this watch be as it's a very attractive looking watch!

Thanks for all your comments!

Not sure about uk market, but here a 'good' price would be a bit over half of what they are asking.

ROGERB · 17 March 2014, 06:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by drsven

I'm curious, is it best to date these watches based on the case serial number or the date on the case back? Reason I ask is because I recently saw a meters first 5513 with a 1.9M serial number, but the case back was stamped 68.

You can have 1.9mil serials with meters first and have the caseback be first quarter of 68

R

15 March 2014, 06:44 AM	#1
Burrost1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: Manchester Watch: Rolex red 1680 Posts: 236	Rolex 5513 pexi 1966 Hi Guys, What do you think?? http://www.ukspecialistwatches.co.uk...-vintage-1966/ http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/3011206134...84.m1423.l2649 Same watch on ebay! As always your thoughts appreciated! Stuart

15 March 2014, 09:05 AM	#4
Old Expat Beast TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron Join Date: Jul 2013 Real Name: Adam Location: Far East Watch: Golden Tuna Posts: 28,784	Overpriced. Do you ever check the For Sale section here? All the watches you post for us to verify seem to come from other sites. __________________ _______________________

15 March 2014, 07:44 PM	#7
Old Expat Beast TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron Join Date: Jul 2013 Real Name: Adam Location: Far East Watch: Golden Tuna Posts: 28,784	I see you have asked for a 1680 but not a 5513. Type 5513 in the search field in the For Sale section..there's quite a few in there, and they come up often. __________________ _______________________

15 March 2014, 11:52 PM	#10
Beaumont Miller II "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: USA Posts: 2,615	Incorrect dial. Should be a gilt gloss or meters first matte dial. Very pricey. __________________

15 March 2014, 08:20 AM	#2
Vincent65 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2012 Location: Switzerland Posts: 14,298	incorrect insert

15 March 2014, 08:37 AM	#3
Burrost1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: Manchester Watch: Rolex red 1680 Posts: 236	Apart from that? correct dial for age? hands etc..? Does price seem excessive?

15 March 2014, 10:37 AM	#5
landroverking "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Real Name: Jay Location: TEXAS Watch: Daytona Posts: 7,648	Mods plz move to vintage.

15 March 2014, 06:43 PM	#6
Burrost1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: Manchester Watch: Rolex red 1680 Posts: 236	Very few come up for sale on here which is why I was posted external ones, I've put a wanted ad up but as yet no reply! Thanks as always!

15 March 2014, 08:00 PM	#8
Burrost1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: Manchester Watch: Rolex red 1680 Posts: 236	I need to add that I'm as well!! Thanks!

15 March 2014, 08:27 PM	#9
Mark020 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Amsterdam Posts: 2,132	Way too expensive

16 March 2014, 12:59 AM	#11
ROGERB "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Real Name: Roger Location: WHITE ROCK BC Watch: 89 16610, 57 7914, Posts: 897	So early 66 based on the serial is not likely accurate despite what Rolex UK may have stated, the case back, bezel, insert and dial and hands are likely a service replacement as well as the band. The serial number puts the watch in the forth quarter of 1967 and would have come with a meters first dial. However the watch looks great, just overpriced for what it truly is. IMHO R

16 March 2014, 04:58 AM	#12
lupus "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: Netherlands Posts: 86	nice case.

16 March 2014, 10:21 AM	#14
Burrost1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: Manchester Watch: Rolex red 1680 Posts: 236	What would a 'good' price for this watch be as it's a very attractive looking watch! Thanks for all your comments!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)