![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
![]() |
#1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Unites States
Posts: 790
|
Undecided, more opinions please
Well last week I asked for opinions wheather I should flip my ROC and Explorer II for a 15202 and many of you chimed in, which I really appreciated.
After reading your comments and doing some meditation I decided that at this moment in time, the 15202 is not worth over $20k to me, hopefully when I get richer it will 😁. Well that being said, since the Explorer II was not really being worn that much and kind of lost the love for it, I sold it to a friend of mine, and decided to use the funds towards an AP steel diver. Well now I would like your opinion on the following question. What makes more sense in my collection? ROC and Diver? Or RO 15400 and Diver? Other than those two watches I also have a SubC. So if I keep the ROC I feel I'll be missing a dressier piece. And the RO although by no means is the same watch as the Jumbo, does share a very similar look. So option 1? ![]() Or 2? ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
I think the dial of the ROC is stunning, I esp like the Automatic under the AP logo as it is on the Jumbo, and also the subdials fit the bigger 41mm case better so that would be my choice.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Soly
Location: UK/US
Watch: Rolex, AP, PP
Posts: 3,089
|
Option 1, I think the ROC is not very sporty and can be worn as a "dressy watch" unless if you have a lot of formal events etc...
Good luck. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Wayne
Location: Singapore
Watch: AP, PP, Rolex
Posts: 1,791
|
Option 1. 15400 and Diver looks similar. ROC adds a little spice to the combo. Furthermore, ROC is versatile for both casual and formal.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Alex
Location: Chicago
Watch: AP,PP, Rolex
Posts: 37,156
|
#1 you have all your bases cover Dress (ROC) play (Diver)
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: London
Watch: PP AP RM
Posts: 794
|
Option 1.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Michael
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,372
|
Number 1. Of course if you don't like chronographs number 2.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: SMD
Location: LGA/EWR/ORD
Watch: AP/PP
Posts: 3,707
|
How about white /silver RO to mix it up a bit?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Unites States
Posts: 790
|
Ok I know I sound like a broken record and to be honest I feel like a woman going through menopause with all my indecisions, I'm stressing the sh*t out of myself, then i feel bad since they're just silly watches.
But besides those two options, a third option would be just the Jumbo. Seriously, everytime I make up my mind, I start seeing photos of the Jumbo and it draws me back to it. That and all the posts from Jumbo owners that speak so highly of it. So my collection could be any one of these (the SubC is not going anywhere) 1. ROC, Diver, SubC 2. 15400, Diver, SubC 3. 15202, SubC |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: US
Posts: 3,257
|
So my thoughts are a bit different but IMO, the ROC is too in-between a RO and ROO (as it was meant to be) and the Diver is a bit too tame as a ROO (again, JMO).
I think that's why you're having some trouble with choices as they are all "middle of the road". Personally I would sell the Diver, get a 15400 and add a ROO Chrono (42mm Panda for example or one of the 2014 releases). |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Unites States
Posts: 790
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Chris
Location: San Diego
Watch: Patek, AP, Rolex
Posts: 4,449
|
I'd go option 1.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Real Name: Steve
Location: Indiana
Watch: PP/AP/VC
Posts: 2,176
|
I'd lean towards option 1, but would seriously consider a white dialed, panda or even blue ROC (depending on what you think of the 39mm vs 41mm watches) to avoid having three black dialed watches. Obviously get what you like, but I like a little variety.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: .
Posts: 17,898
|
Keep the ROC!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: James
Location: Toronto
Watch: IG: @j.project
Posts: 2,194
|
I would go with Option 3, as I currently have the ROC and SubC as well and have never been able to get the 15202 out of my mind.
I have thought about selling my ROC, but don't want to give up my SubC or PAM at this time as well to get the 15202. But if you are able to keep the SubC, I think the 15202 and SubC pairing is great, giving you both the dressier and sportier watch options. My grail is actually the 15305, but that's going to still take some time for me to get there. So that's why I've been holding off on the 15202, as I also can't get the 15305 out of my mind :) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: Derek
Location: St. Louis
Watch: A. Lange & Sohne
Posts: 518
|
1
I like option 1
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 3,928
|
I vote option 1. Good luck!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: North Carolina
Watch: DD 118206
Posts: 1,858
|
Option. Nicer variation. Visually much more different.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: CET
Posts: 35,561
|
With the Diver and SubC and wanting a dressier option on your wrist, I think it's worth considering a 15300 instead of the ROC.
That being said, if you want to stay larger, I would keep the ROC over flipping for a 15400. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: USA
Watch: 15407ST
Posts: 963
|
Option 1!!!!!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 37,592
|
I like option 3. 15202 trumps 15400 all day and I don't love ROOs, based on my personable preference for lighter smaller watches. I do lust a fc diver though, which I assume is light.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: YYZ
Watch: PP AP Rolex PAM
Posts: 348
|
Easy. Option 1 gives you the best balance and flexibility.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Manila
Posts: 43
|
I'll go with option 2:
Why? Because that's the route I want to take ![]() I already have the 15400 blue and want to add the diver soon. I think it would be a great complement to both pieces. Goodluck with the decision. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Ben
Location: SIN & JKT
Watch: Rolex, AP, PP
Posts: 9,874
|
Option 2, but I will go for a white dial or blue dial for the RO.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Alex
Location: Gotham City
Watch: IG: Mr_Right_NYC
Posts: 5,672
|
Chrono
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Mike G
Location: Ohio
Watch: Rolex-Patek-AP
Posts: 3,080
|
It seems like you keep going back to the jumbo so I say 15202 FTW! Sporty and elegant or save some more and bump up your budget for a 5711 blue dial.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,946
|
I'd hold out for the 15202
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Wayne
Location: Singapore
Watch: AP, PP, Rolex
Posts: 1,791
|
Now that 15202 is included as an option, I would say go for option 3, i.e. 15202 & SubC. You can get back another ROC (perhaps in silver dial) later if you feel like having a chrono again.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Asia Pacific
Watch: AP ROC
Posts: 34
|
I would go with Option 1. You gotta have a chrono in your collection. Plus, for me, the ROC is a really under appreciated model. Most people would go for ROO.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.