ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
15 March 2008, 03:26 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Minas
Location: London UK
Watch: Rolex , Omega
Posts: 1,370
|
Why do we buy a Rolex?
As a proud Rolex owner, I have some idea myself of course ...
But as an academic researcher, I have a literature on psychographic research suggesting various motivations amongst or traits of consumers of luxuries. Briefly these are 1) status-seeking, 2) need-for-uniqueness, 3) conformity - interpersonal influences, 4) fashion influence, 5) vanity (yes, vanity ), 6) hedonic-experiential motives, 7) quality-seeking (of course, if not Rolex, who else?) 7) materialism ... to list the most important I know the list sounds dry and lifeless - after all you can't put your feelings or personality in a list, can you? But give it a try... This is part of my "applied" research, in a qualitative exploratory attempt to generate insights that will be statistically tested later. It will result in published research at another point which I will repost here as well. So what do you think? What does a Rolex mean to us and for our identity so that we are eager to pay the price? Can you add smth - can you comment? You don't have to stick to the above...feel free to speak for yourself; if we are all a separate category from those who buy any other watch, there must be a reason for this ... |
15 March 2008, 03:29 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Brandon
Location: FL
Watch: ing my second hand
Posts: 869
|
1) I wanted a Rolex.
|
15 March 2008, 03:32 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Minas
Location: London UK
Watch: Rolex , Omega
Posts: 1,370
|
|
15 March 2008, 03:45 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: US
Posts: 1,999
|
I would suppose those characteristics you described are on point for the majority of rolex owners. I guess the question should be, what is the percent each of those characteristics you described weigh more than others. I mean i'll be man enough to admit, there is a % of why I purchased a rolex is for status. It's a similar argument for vehicles, you could say luxury vehicles are safer than their economy counterparts, BUT such economy brands like Hyundai actually have better safety records than their luxury counterparts. It's just that most luxury car owners do not want to admit they purchased the car for the name brand, because of fear of being branded ostentatious, fake, or vain.
|
15 March 2008, 03:45 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Nick
Location: Sonoma Co., CA
Watch: GMTIIc
Posts: 798
|
As a child, one learns of a brand or a specific model and idolizes it. Possibly a symbol adulthood? A coming of age?
I love it for it's quality, it's name, the brand awareness, the intelligence of buying something that with time will hold / grow it's value. Then, when you put all of that (the above applys to many products/brands) relative to an item (a watch) that I'd have anyway, no matter what, by some producer or another... Then, it all builds to a "it just make's sense to me" kind of thing. Oh, and I just plainly love and respect what the watch stands for. It stands for a higher standard, precision, reliability, meticulous detail and honor. It stands for luxury and refinement. These are all things that I seek in my life, Rolex or not. I'm simply glad and humbly thankful that I am able to enjoy Rolex (not one but, two fine time pieces)!
__________________
Present: 116710LN SS GMT-Master II C Past: 16610 SS Sub Date |
15 March 2008, 03:45 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Manos
Location: ITS
Watch: Bedside alarm
Posts: 209
|
Time is precious...So, as far as I am concerned, it's worth investing in! I guess it is most appropriate that the brand logo is a crown...
|
15 March 2008, 03:46 AM | #7 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Miguel Cornejo
Location: El Paso Tx
Watch: 116500LN
Posts: 488
|
Quote:
For me it's luky number 7 !!!! Quality and reiliability as well as the heritage of the brand! Good luck chuck!
__________________
Rolex Daytona 116500LN Black, Rolex Daytona 116500LN White, Rolex TT GMTIIC, Panerai 88, Cartier Santos TT Auto, Omega Seamaster GMT Bond Co-axial, Omega Constellation SS Auto, Tag Heuer Carrera Chrono Tachy Auto |
|
15 March 2008, 03:47 AM | #8 |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
|
I was born out of a Rolex!!
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
15 March 2008, 03:47 AM | #9 |
1,000,000th PostMember
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 14,048
|
__________________
GMT - Master II C - 116710 LN |
15 March 2008, 03:49 AM | #10 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Utah
Watch: Lover
Posts: 3,926
|
I tend to buy for a few reasons.
Most important, the watch has to smile hard at me when on my wrist. Certain models do, others don't.
Second, I want a reliable watch from a company with a reputation for reliability. Last, I want a dependable service center should the watch need work. Rolex satisfies on these accounts. And eventually, I'll be buying a Richard Lange (pictured below) for the same reasons. |
15 March 2008, 03:54 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Minas
Location: London UK
Watch: Rolex , Omega
Posts: 1,370
|
You guys are amazing!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
15 March 2008, 03:55 AM | #12 |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
|
....and this is only the very tip of the iceberg!!
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
15 March 2008, 03:59 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Vernon
Location: C-a-n-a-d-a
Watch: 16600
Posts: 5,641
|
My parents owns them - didn't really understood what Rolex was about until I learned more about it.
__________________
I'm just a cook... |
15 March 2008, 04:00 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Real Name: Paul
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 14,578
|
I just buy whatever Paulie (Mailman) tells me to.
|
15 March 2008, 04:02 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
|
I like it for its timelessness (pardon the pun).
I mean, they can last forever, the can be repair to be brand new. They can be passed on. They look better with age (patina), etc. They are timeless in style. All these things considered, a Rolex is cheap!!!!!
__________________
member#3242 |
15 March 2008, 04:07 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Minas
Location: London UK
Watch: Rolex , Omega
Posts: 1,370
|
|
15 March 2008, 04:15 AM | #17 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: John
Location: Birmingham, UK
Watch: Panerai 219 Destro
Posts: 100
|
As a academic (philosopher-sociologist) I have always been thinking that the ESRC / AHRB ought to fund a PhD studentship on the social constructionism of prestige watches and ascertain just what it is that's in a watch. I like my Panerai and Rolex watches because of their histories. However, I believe they are perceived by many to exude masculinity, a sense of financial security, attention to detail and quality. I'm surprised that some of my undergrad students keep glancing at my Exp II when I wear short sleeves. I really wonder what they think!
|
15 March 2008, 04:15 AM | #18 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 126600, 116500LN
Posts: 12,849
|
To impress bartenders and fellow bar-flies, plus chicks dig'em
__________________
"I'm kind of a big deal... on a fairly irrelevant social media site that falsely inflates my fragile ego" |
15 March 2008, 04:30 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Leighton
Location: So. California
Watch: SS GMT IIc
Posts: 1,366
|
Once I looked it up to see what it meant, I bought my Rolex for "hedonic-experiential motives"!
Hedonic From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search Hedonic means "relating to utility". Literally it means: "related to pleasure". The term is used both by economists and by other scientists. It means simply that one item or measure is judged better than another. The term hedonism, while from a related root means search for excessive pleasure. Hedonic: related to the search of pleasing the flesh
__________________
GMT MASTER II 116710N |
15 March 2008, 04:37 AM | #20 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Minas
Location: London UK
Watch: Rolex , Omega
Posts: 1,370
|
Quote:
Seeking experiences relates mostly to the psychological side ... Utility is quality - not hedonic - different from hedonic consumption... |
|
15 March 2008, 05:40 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: David
Location: USA
Watch: your step!
Posts: 7,882
|
All of these, in no particular order of ranking:
1. Quality 2. Durability 3. Success (reminds ME of my hard work and resulting success from said work, allowing me to afford it) 4. High residual value 5. Appearance to me (there is a timeless beauty that never fades, I enjoy looking at it) 6. Stability (as it relates to the aforementioned attributes) 7. Visceral desire that is not ephemaral Moreso than anything though, for me, ownership of a Rolex is more than having a nice watch, it is the concrete realization of a dream.
__________________
Rolex. The Rolex of watches. 16570 Expy2 Noir, 116710 GMT Master II, 2552.80 SMP |
15 March 2008, 05:59 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 9,407
|
I bought mine because I need a cheap watch to goof about in.
J |
15 March 2008, 06:04 AM | #23 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: NE
Posts: 26
|
The only difference between want and need is a strong desire. I think the real question would be "How did you obtain your Rolex".
The road to Rolex! |
15 March 2008, 06:21 AM | #24 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Andrew
Location: Arizona
Watch: Patek Nautilis
Posts: 47
|
I look at the rolex watch as the Cadillac for the baby boomers. I had always heard about Rolex and Patek. You do not own one, you maintain it for the next generation. The Cadillac was always their top of the line in terms of quality etc.. For my generation (y) the car to own is Ferrari or Lamborghini, but the watch is still a rolex. Hmm in retrospect, it seems like I just rambled.
|
15 March 2008, 06:42 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,571
|
I would say all of the reasons you list apply to some extent--except the desire for unique-ness.
|
15 March 2008, 07:17 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Gary
Location: GMT-6
Watch: GMT
Posts: 3,350
|
When I bought my Rolex I lived in Geneva and wanted something to remind me of my three year visit. I bought into the whole toughest watch in the world thing and wanted a watch where the battery would not run out when I was traveling. I was very influenced by the adventure advertising they did in the 80's. Later I found out what a status symbol Rolex is, but I didn't come from a background where you would run across Rolex, and looking back I must have been one of very few people who did not know the name. I'm a still a fan of the Rolex sports tool watches today.
__________________
Omega Seamaster 300M GMT Noire Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra 8500 Benson 1937 Sterling Silver Hunter |
15 March 2008, 07:28 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
|
I buy Rolex since NO other brand quite seems to beat it. I have tried on most high end brands in the world. For example Patek and Lange & Söhne. You might find a more beautifully decored movement, but their watches in generel are not as sturdy as Rolex movt.
I have owned an IWC Doppelchronograph and a Zenith El Primero "Class 4" chronograph, and although both watches were nice, they just couldn't beat Rolex in overall build quality and accuracy.
__________________
With kind regards, Bo LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw... |
15 March 2008, 09:14 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Nick
Location: Sonoma Co., CA
Watch: GMTIIc
Posts: 798
|
What about the FF Bo?
Sorry to hijak!
__________________
Present: 116710LN SS GMT-Master II C Past: 16610 SS Sub Date |
15 March 2008, 09:38 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Mike
Location: Virginia, US
Watch: SD 16600
Posts: 4,319
|
I bought the SD despite the fact that is was a Rolex. I had always loved the Sub's and SD but wasn't sure I wanted to deal with what I perceived as the baggage of owning a Rolex since I come from a pretty humble background. I looked at Omega, Doxa, another Tag, etc. but kept coming back to the SD.
Since I purchased it I have had absolutely no regrets and will undoubtedly purchase another Rolex. Basically, I see my SD as an extension of myself. Rugged, tough, individualistic and humble with an a slight sophistication and just too damn good looking for its own good.
__________________
The fool, with all his other faults, has this also - he is always getting ready to live. - Epicurus (341–270 BC) |
15 March 2008, 09:44 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Mark
Location: California
Watch: R
Posts: 913
|
i bought the first Rolex (a TT SM) because i liked the way it looked.
the second was a platinum DD; i just liked the looks of that one too. by the third, i tried looking at other brands, like cartier, patek, etc. In fact my wife bought me two tiffanys which i made her take back, and wanted to get me a patek, which i turned down..... always coming back to Rolex i just like the look of rolex. (but i will admit i did see a really nice patek complicated movement with leather strap last trip to the AD.....) |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.