ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

3274chidesj · 29 May 2014, 06:43 AM

Supposed to be a circa 2001 model
Looking for opinions if it looks like a fake, so I can return it?

More pictures to come
Thanks!

baconcheesedeluxe · 29 May 2014, 06:51 AM

I believe the Maxi dial was introduced later than 2001.

3274chidesj · 29 May 2014, 06:53 AM

It said circa 2002 actually... They "weren't sure"

3274chidesj · 29 May 2014, 06:57 AM

More

bayerische · 29 May 2014, 08:27 AM

Fake.

shakeel · 29 May 2014, 08:36 AM

The dial doesn't look centered to me. The ticks touch the case on one side but are a good distance away on the other side. Could be the angle as im no expert. Can someone confirm if this is correct?

AbsolutelyROLEX! · 29 May 2014, 09:24 AM

This is a fake, stem insert is much too narrow,

3274chidesj · 29 May 2014, 09:44 AM

Thanks everyone - returning for full refund

crowncollection · 29 May 2014, 10:30 AM

band is fake, bezel insert is fake, dial wrong

Cc1966 · 30 May 2014, 11:47 PM

This whole thread seems fishy....

locutus49 · 30 May 2014, 11:54 PM

Bezel insert looks flat (not shiny at all).

3274chidesj · 31 May 2014, 07:03 AM

Here are some pictures
Explorer ii
1999

#16570

3274chidesj · 31 May 2014, 07:05 AM

More pictures

bayerische · 31 May 2014, 10:43 AM

Hmmmm......

29 May 2014, 08:27 AM	#5
bayerische "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Real Name: Andreas Location: Margaritaville Watch: Smurf Posts: 19,879	Fake. __________________ Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

29 May 2014, 09:24 AM	#7
AbsolutelyROLEX! "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2011 Real Name: Andy Location: Ontario, Canada Watch: AKA: ANDERL712000 Posts: 4,935	This is a fake, stem insert is much too narrow, __________________ We want to be the first in the field and Rolex should be seen as the one and only-the best. Hans Wilsdorf, Rolex founder

29 May 2014, 10:30 AM	#9
crowncollection "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Real Name: David Location: australia Posts: 20,215	band is fake, bezel insert is fake, dial wrong __________________ watches many

30 May 2014, 11:47 PM	#10
Cc1966 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2013 Real Name: Christopher Location: Georgia, USA Watch: ing the Sea... Posts: 6,713	This whole thread seems fishy.... __________________ "I wish to have no Connection with any Ship that does not Sail fast for I intend to go in harm's way." Captain John Paul Jones, 16 November 1778 "*Curmudgeons* " Favorites: 1665 SD, Sub Date, DSSD, Exp II, Sub LV, GMTIIc

31 May 2014, 10:43 AM	#14
bayerische "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Real Name: Andreas Location: Margaritaville Watch: Smurf Posts: 19,879	Hmmmm...... __________________ Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

29 May 2014, 06:51 AM	#2
baconcheesedeluxe "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: Dexter Watch: Rolex Date Posts: 21	I believe the Maxi dial was introduced later than 2001.

29 May 2014, 06:53 AM	#3
3274chidesj "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2014 Location: United States Posts: 6	It said circa 2002 actually... They "weren't sure"

29 May 2014, 08:36 AM	#6
shakeel "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2012 Location: Europe Posts: 82	The dial doesn't look centered to me. The ticks touch the case on one side but are a good distance away on the other side. Could be the angle as im no expert. Can someone confirm if this is correct?

29 May 2014, 09:44 AM	#8
3274chidesj "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2014 Location: United States Posts: 6	Thanks everyone - returning for full refund

30 May 2014, 11:54 PM	#11
locutus49 Banned Join Date: May 2014 Real Name: John Location: La Jolla, CA Watch: Platona Posts: 12,194	Bezel insert looks flat (not shiny at all).

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)