ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
11 August 2014, 08:08 PM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: London
Posts: 18
|
Thoughts on potential '68 5513 purchase
Dear all,
I am looking at purchasing the attached '68 5513, and wanted to court peoples views on it's quality and likely fair market value. It appears to have an original dial that (and I am no expert) matches with it's vintage: matte dial, white writing, meters first. The lume looks to be a little damaged, and there is some corrosion to the hands, but their patina looks to be relatively well-matched. The pearl looks to be a later replacement, and is distinctly non-matched, but other than that, the condition looks fairly good, with original (I think) acrylic crystal. It has both a 93150 bracelet and an (older?) rivited sprung bracelet included... not sure which matches the vintage better. I don't have the serial number unfortunately. I can have it for $6000/£3575, which feels good value to me. Thoughts? Additionally, I'd like to replace the bracelets for a NATO; what size screwdriver do I need? Or can the job be done with a paperclip, as I have sometimes heard..? Many thanks for anyone's views. John. |
11 August 2014, 09:54 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: michael
Location: Florida
Watch: explorer II cream
Posts: 1,664
|
Actually looks like decent example. Relatively polished little as strong chamfers & looks like period insert or close. Discoloration of minute markers are subjective. I'd want to see it under uv light. I'd bet it glows that odd green color & check serial & model under bracelet as well as have case back removed by competent watchmaker, check date stamp & then movement condition. M
|
11 August 2014, 10:36 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Ca
Posts: 2
|
nice decent case, but horrible dial.
|
11 August 2014, 10:46 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 2,132
|
Dial is poor imho.
|
11 August 2014, 10:58 PM | #5 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,794
|
Not a fan of that lume.
|
11 August 2014, 10:59 PM | #6 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Greg
Location: michigan
Watch: Rolex Oyster
Posts: 4,046
|
It's a pretty original watch, still retains the original crown on it which is pretty neat, i prefer creamy white patina but some like it like this. $6,000 seems to be pretty spot on market value, case has seen some polishing, but it's not extremely over polished like most examples from the era, I think you could find a better example for the money. Especially since you plan on throwing it on a NATO. I'd rather have a near pristine watch head for the price than a few extra bracelets I didn't plan on using. You can pop the springbars out with a toothpick or paper clip, no screwdriver needed
And the expandable bracelet was usually used for divers back in the day so it would fit over their wetsuit, I doubt it's original to this watch as it's date coded 1970, but if this watch was used for diving I would advise having it opened to check where the caseback meets the case for pitting. |
11 August 2014, 11:18 PM | #7 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: London
Posts: 18
|
Thanks all for the comments. I still don't have the serial no, but attached a couple of pics of the caseback and the 1520 movement.
Agreed the lume is a little non-traditional and not to everyone's taste. How much should I be able to get for the two bracelets on the open market? |
11 August 2014, 11:26 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 14,298
|
I'd pass based on the dial and the considerable corrosion on the back of the case.
|
11 August 2014, 11:29 PM | #9 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,794
|
Too much pitting and corrosion on case back.
|
11 August 2014, 11:49 PM | #10 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: London
Posts: 18
|
Thank you. Does the pitting and corrosion realistically only affect water resistance performance? Or it causes further problems and complications? And if so, is is it repairable or only at considerable cost & effort?
|
12 August 2014, 12:03 AM | #11 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Real Name: Who Dat
Location: USA
Watch: 5512
Posts: 1,149
|
The pitting and corrosion is easily repaired...does that case back say IV.58 or 68?
|
12 August 2014, 12:09 AM | #12 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: London
Posts: 18
|
Good point! I was worried it said '58 (which would be very worrying, and make no sense at all... per an earlier post of mine!) but if you zoom in, I'm pretty sure it says '68 and it's just the photograph. Glad to hear the corrosion and pitting is easily dealt with. Should that be done immediately?
|
12 August 2014, 12:13 AM | #13 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Greg
Location: michigan
Watch: Rolex Oyster
Posts: 4,046
|
Realistically you could put RTV or a similar sealant and it would perform just as well, you could have it laser welded and re milled down. But a meters first 5513 isn't a particularly rare watch, and with the money you would invest restoring this one, it just doesn't make sense in my opinion to put the money in it. Especially since after you're done it's still going to be a restored case and not original. I'd search for another example, as this will affect resale value.
|
12 August 2014, 12:18 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Chris
Location: Cen-Cal
Watch: 16610
Posts: 869
|
Wow....talk about a flood. That watch looks like Noah wore it.
Dial looks like it does because at some point the back leaked and flooded the watch. |
12 August 2014, 01:20 AM | #15 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: London
Posts: 18
|
That's interesting feedback, thank you very much. I'm based in the UK and the vast majority of 5513 examples I see for sale here (although many are arguably better examples for the same money) originate from the US, where I get stumped for c. 27% import duty. On that basis, at £3480 ($5840) it therefore still seems a reasonable bet for me, given it is said to be keeping good time, and I'm not going to be swimming in it...unless anyone can point me to any other UK-based sellers where I can shop around. Or unless I missed something.
Last edited by john_coburg; 12 August 2014 at 01:27 AM.. Reason: Correcting FX |
12 August 2014, 01:30 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 2,615
|
Dial is authentic.
Case is very strong. My feeling is that unless green is your your favorite color, at some point you will regret buying a Sub with green tones of patina. Jedly, Mike Wood, and Jason Graham are all trusted UK based dealers.
__________________
|
12 August 2014, 01:41 AM | #17 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Greg
Location: michigan
Watch: Rolex Oyster
Posts: 4,046
|
Quote:
|
|
12 August 2014, 05:21 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 1,000
|
I was liking it until I saw the corrosion ....
Nice case, really does look to be a correct. honest watch and lume colour / dial ageing is such a personal thing.
Aged plots - be they green, cream or yellow - can look charmingly 'vintage' in the flesh but hey - I'm a patina fan. Remember too that macro pics really exaggerate patina. The corrosion though is a whole different story. Many prospective buyers would quickly reject that watch at (almost) any price point. So it's not worth $6k to me and not worth repairing at that price IMO |
12 August 2014, 06:42 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: michael
Location: Florida
Watch: explorer II cream
Posts: 1,664
|
After those shots I'd pass as well. too much bother to repair and not reasonable for price.
If it was 4K then a maybe. Better examples to be found imho, here in States and across the pond. luck M |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.