The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 4 September 2014, 10:41 AM   #1
ColRam425
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: DFW, Texas
Posts: 473
Precious metal question I have always wondered

Okay so as we pretty much all know, Rolex makes watches in stainless steel, 18k golds, and 950 platinum. That being said I have always wondered why Rolex doesn't make 925 sterling silver watches. To me it is the perfect "half way" metal between stainless steel and 18k gold (not counting Rolesor). Since Rolex is known for precious metal watches, why not make silver models for prices between that of SS and Au?
ColRam425 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 September 2014, 10:53 AM   #2
bradj
"TRF" Member
 
bradj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Austin, TX
Watch: 116610LN 116613LB
Posts: 359
Two reasons I can think of

1) Silver tarnishes, not ideal for a watch.
2) 16oz of silver is only about $350 USD.. not really that precious.
bradj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 September 2014, 11:06 AM   #3
ColRam425
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: DFW, Texas
Posts: 473
Quote:
Originally Posted by bradj View Post
Two reasons I can think of

1) Silver tarnishes, not ideal for a watch.
2) 16oz of silver is only about $350 USD.. not really that precious.
I thought only pure Ag tarnishes though. I thought Sterling Silver was made specifically to avoid tarnish. And as for the price, it still is worth way more than steel.
ColRam425 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 September 2014, 11:10 AM   #4
bradj
"TRF" Member
 
bradj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Austin, TX
Watch: 116610LN 116613LB
Posts: 359
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColRam425 View Post
I thought only pure Ag tarnishes though. I thought Sterling Silver was made specifically to avoid tarnish. And as for the price, it still is worth way more than steel.
Relative to the price of a Rolex, silver is not "way more" than SS. I'd much rather the performance of SS over silver as well.
bradj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 September 2014, 11:17 AM   #5
Speed
"TRF" Member
 
Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
Wouldn't do much for the brand...would it?
Speed is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 4 September 2014, 11:30 AM   #6
Dvenus11
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Sunny
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: GMT Master 2
Posts: 941
i personally prefer stainless steel over silver
Dvenus11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 September 2014, 11:34 AM   #7
samsam
"TRF" Member
 
samsam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,826
I think you have a valid question; however, even sterling silver tarnishes with time (from experience).
samsam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 September 2014, 11:38 AM   #8
ColRam425
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: DFW, Texas
Posts: 473
Actually this may answer my own question but could it have anything to do with salt water corroding Ag, thus making the water-proofness of all Oysters irrelevant?
ColRam425 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 September 2014, 11:51 AM   #9
landroverking
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Jay
Location: TEXAS
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 7,648
And it's soft
landroverking is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 September 2014, 11:55 AM   #10
ExplorerChris
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Chris
Location: Ontario, Canada
Watch: Explorer II 16550
Posts: 1,401
The day Rolex makes 92.5 % sterling watches (I know they won't that's why I say this)
I get rid of my Explorer II and never look at Rolex again.
__________________
There's a crown for every achievement

A Watch Is Just A Watch
A Rolex Is A Timepiece
ExplorerChris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 September 2014, 12:19 PM   #11
redsubby
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Henry
Location: TW/SoCal
Posts: 1,632
If we have people b!tch about their polished center links being too shiny, I wonder what they will say about a silver watch...
redsubby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 September 2014, 12:24 PM   #12
chemistryde
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Dallas, Texas
Watch: All Daytonas&Subs
Posts: 90
Quote:
Originally Posted by landroverking View Post
And it's soft
It's actually somewhat harder than 18K gold!

But yes, the correct answer is that silver tarnishes (i.e. it oxidizes due to contact with sulfides in the air). 925 silver (sterling silver) contains 92.5% Ag and 7.5% Cu. Both will oxidize over time!

A watch made of sterling silver would look quite ugly (brown/black) after a while especially the little areas between the links/lugs that are hard to reach with a polishing cloth.
chemistryde is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 September 2014, 12:51 PM   #13
MILGAUSS88
"TRF" Member
 
MILGAUSS88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: mississippi river
Posts: 3,165
There are some early Rolexes made of silver. 1910's and 1920's. I own 2.
Omega made several watches in silver during this time period as well. The Longines Lindbergh Hour Angle watch came in silver.
The cases have a dark hue on the outside, along the lines of nickel. The have held up for 90 years to date, so it should be feasible.
How it would react with salt water, I do not know.
Maybe Panerai will make a silver edition, to go with there bronze watch.
MILGAUSS88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 September 2014, 12:59 PM   #14
ExplorerChris
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Chris
Location: Ontario, Canada
Watch: Explorer II 16550
Posts: 1,401
92.5 Sterling looks awful after being in a pool, hot tub or the ocean it looks very ugly
__________________
There's a crown for every achievement

A Watch Is Just A Watch
A Rolex Is A Timepiece
ExplorerChris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 September 2014, 01:26 PM   #15
richard371
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: sf
Watch: 116500LN White
Posts: 1,853
They could make a sterling silver Daytona with turquoise dial and smokey quartz bezel. Aka the poor mans Platona sold at your local 7-11
richard371 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 September 2014, 08:59 PM   #16
Roger1079
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: South FL
Posts: 444
Quote:
Originally Posted by chemistryde View Post
It's actually somewhat harder than 18K gold!

But yes, the correct answer is that silver tarnishes (i.e. it oxidizes due to contact with sulfides in the air). 925 silver (sterling silver) contains 92.5% Ag and 7.5% Cu. Both will oxidize over time!

A watch made of sterling silver would look quite ugly (brown/black) after a while especially the little areas between the links/lugs that are hard to reach with a polishing cloth.
I agree with everything except your first sentence. Silver is only harder than gold in its purest form (24k). Once the gold is mixed with other elements to reach the usual 18k and 14k found in most jewelry its hardness will usually exceed that of sterling silver (silver and copper). How much softer it is all depends on what type of gold being referred to (yellow, pink, white, green, etc.) and the mix of elements used to obtain those colors.

To the poster earlier that asked about sterling silver tarnishing, it absolutely does. When debating whether to use it in a watch, the downsides far outweigh any benefit over stainless steel.
Roger1079 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 September 2014, 09:12 PM   #17
Rolexpharm
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Bensalem, Pa
Posts: 638
It would be interesting to see but I don't think they will do it. If they have done it in the past and haven't returned it, it is probably for good reason
Rolexpharm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 September 2014, 09:44 PM   #18
Lol-x
Facilitator
 
Lol-x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Real Name: Steve
Location: Omnipresent
Posts: 33,553
Offensive comments are not acceptable.
Infraction issued.
__________________

Most folks are about as happy as they make up their minds to be. ~Abraham Lincoln
Nothing compares to the simple pleasure of a bike ride. ~John F. Kennedy

ROLEXploitation - yeah I'm a victim
Lol-x is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 September 2014, 09:57 PM   #19
dalip
"TRF" Member
 
dalip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Dalip
Location: Mumbai and Perth
Watch: Rolex PAM Omega
Posts: 18,656
Absolutely disgusting ...Small minded and sad.
__________________



------------------------------------------------------------
"The liar's punishment is not in the least that he is not believed, but that he cannot believe anyone else." George Bernard Shaw
dalip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 September 2014, 10:53 PM   #20
Dittox
"TRF" Member
 
Dittox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Mexico City
Watch: Explorer II
Posts: 262
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roger1079 View Post
To the poster earlier that asked about sterling silver tarnishing, it absolutely does. When debating whether to use it in a watch, the downsides far outweigh any benefit over stainless steel.
There are some alloys of silver that are tarnish-resistant. This is accomplished by replacing some of the copper in the alloy with germanium which also makes it harder. However, this alloy is significantly more expensive than the traditional sterling silver. Nonetheless, I think that Rolex has the silver color pretty well-covered with the SS and WG watches!
Dittox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 September 2014, 11:06 PM   #21
Suicide King
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Croatia
Posts: 34
I'm allergic to silver,and so is my mother for example.I'm sure we're not the only people allergic to silver.
Silver is inferior material and looks cheap.
Suicide King is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 September 2014, 11:22 PM   #22
kilyung
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
Quote:
Originally Posted by Suicide King View Post
I'm allergic to silver,and so is my mother for example.I'm sure we're not the only people allergic to silver.
Yeah, I mean werewolves wear watches also!
kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 September 2014, 12:03 AM   #23
locutus49
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: John
Location: La Jolla, CA
Watch: Platona
Posts: 12,194
The key objection to sterling - which one company is going to fix with a new alloy - is that when it oxidizes (tarnishes), it does so INSIDE the case as well, thus depositing particles on the mechanical pieces inside. Although My wife has an Hermes Cape Cod in sterling and it seems to run fine (quartz movement is the reason) and the exterior tarnishing is minimal.
locutus49 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 September 2014, 12:05 AM   #24
locutus49
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: John
Location: La Jolla, CA
Watch: Platona
Posts: 12,194
Do you avoid direct sunlight and do you like your steak very rare? If so, you will live a very, very long time. Avoid wooden stakes, though

Quote:
Originally Posted by Suicide King View Post
I'm allergic to silver,and so is my mother for example.I'm sure we're not the only people allergic to silver.
Silver is inferior material and looks cheap.
locutus49 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 September 2014, 01:35 AM   #25
joe100
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
joe100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Joe
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 12,838
Quote:
Originally Posted by richard371 View Post
They could make a sterling silver Daytona with turquoise dial and smokey quartz bezel. Aka the poor mans Platona sold at your local indian reservation :)
My other half is Native American. Really poor taste.
__________________
It's Espresso, not Expresso. Coffee is not a train in Italy.
-TRF Member 6982-
joe100 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 September 2014, 01:39 AM   #26
Daytona4130
"TRF" Member
 
Daytona4130's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Jack
Location: 'Murica
Watch: HBO:)
Posts: 1,363
Would a tarnished silver sub not look bad a$$? I think it would be cool, but very unlikely to them to do it
Daytona4130 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 September 2014, 01:49 AM   #27
ExplorerChris
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Chris
Location: Ontario, Canada
Watch: Explorer II 16550
Posts: 1,401
Quote:
Originally Posted by richard371 View Post
They could make a sterling silver Daytona with turquoise dial and smokey quartz bezel. Aka the poor mans Platona sold at your local indian reservation :)
This indavidual owes this forum a retraction of their racist statement as well as an apology to the members.

No matter who we are are, what we believe, who we vote for and who we worship if we choose to worship we are united by our passion for Rolex.
Everyone is equal, everyone is welcome and everyone is accepted and that's what makes this the worlds best forum hands down.

However comments such as this are not welcome or accepted and neither are the people who make them.
Take your white sheet and hood off and look around, we are all human beings with thoughts, feelings, dreams and aspirations. There is enough BS going on all around us we don't need it here. This is our oasis, our sanctuary and a place to get away for a while.

To my fellow members
__________________
There's a crown for every achievement

A Watch Is Just A Watch
A Rolex Is A Timepiece
ExplorerChris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 September 2014, 04:31 AM   #28
bradj
"TRF" Member
 
bradj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Austin, TX
Watch: 116610LN 116613LB
Posts: 359
I still fall back on the fact that Silver really that precious or valuable of a metal and doesn't fall into a halfway spot between Gold and SS so it doesn't make sense.

9/4 Spot Prices

$19.08 USD oz Silver
$1263.80 USD oz Gold

Even if SS was $0.00 USD oz, Silver is a very long way off from being in the middle.
~
bradj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 September 2014, 04:34 AM   #29
dysondiver
"TRF" Member
 
dysondiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: tom
Location: northern ireland
Watch: my fins
Posts: 10,063
how about a titanium sub.
dysondiver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 September 2014, 04:36 AM   #30
ExplorerChris
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Chris
Location: Ontario, Canada
Watch: Explorer II 16550
Posts: 1,401
Quote:
Originally Posted by dysondiver View Post
how about a titanium sub.
Titanium would be a lot better, it won't react poorly to pool or hot tub water or swimming in salt water the way sterling silver would
__________________
There's a crown for every achievement

A Watch Is Just A Watch
A Rolex Is A Timepiece
ExplorerChris is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.