ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
9 October 2014, 12:33 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Adam
Location: UK
Watch: 124273
Posts: 831
|
Do you own both the 36mm AND 39mm Explorers?
I've got the 39mm Explorer, which I think is absolutely extraordinary! I fact, I think the design of the Explorer is so fabulous, I'm seriously considering getting the 36mm version too. Aside from the question of how mental that idea is, does anyone here have both? My wrist is 6.75" and I actually think the 36mm would look better. Anyway, I'd be interested to read your comments. Thanks. Adam.
|
9 October 2014, 12:40 AM | #2 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA & France
Posts: 11,078
|
Nope, I had the 39mm but as great as I think it is I moved it and found a NOS 114270. Love it.
|
9 October 2014, 12:40 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,654
|
I'm a fan of getting a pair of a favorite watch so I'd do it Adam. Cheers.
|
9 October 2014, 12:49 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Adrian
Location: Tanzania
Posts: 1,553
|
Lol, yeah I own one of each and I do think it's quite mental , but I don't care. My wrist is 7.25 and they both wear so comfortable. I keep the 39mm on a leather strap and the 36mm on the bracelet.
Interestingly enough, I had the 39 before I got the 36, but one day DavidSW had a pristine 36mm and could not help myself. |
9 October 2014, 01:27 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Somewhere/Nowhere
Watch: SS Daytona White
Posts: 36
|
I have a 36 mm Explorer for my everyday bang around timepiece and I have a small wrist, all but two links have been taken out, it is extremely comfortable.
|
9 October 2014, 03:01 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Adam
Location: UK
Watch: 124273
Posts: 831
|
Thanks for your thoughts.
Adrian - your pictures prove my point. Your wrist is larger than mine yet the 36mm Explorer looks perfect, in my opinion. Now, where will I be able to find a new or pristine 114270, with the engraved rehuat...? |
9 October 2014, 03:24 AM | #7 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA & France
Posts: 11,078
|
My 36mm Explorer on my 7 1/4 wrist
|
9 October 2014, 03:46 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Adam
Location: UK
Watch: 124273
Posts: 831
|
Stunning, Patrick!
I'm weakening by the second... |
9 October 2014, 03:55 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PHILA
Posts: 1,723
|
Always wanted one but found the 36mm too small for my wrist, so when the 39mm came out I just knew I had to have it. Boy am I glad I did!
|
9 October 2014, 08:49 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Davey
Location: Australia
Watch: 1st or 2nd
Posts: 89
|
Have a 114270, love the size and elegance, don't think I would ever entertain adding the 39mm version, would opt to add a 14060 instead. My two cents
|
9 October 2014, 09:05 AM | #11 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,780
|
|
9 October 2014, 11:33 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
|
I only have the 36mm, but will one day buy the 39mm to add to my collection!
|
9 October 2014, 11:42 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Alex
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 210
|
I have the 39mm, but would love to get one of the older 36mm with the lume painted numbers (the 1016) instead of the white gold. I wouldn't get the smaller version of the same watch in this case, but have nothing against getting a vintage piece that also happens to be a smaller version.
|
9 October 2014, 03:56 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: canada
Watch: rolex explorer ii
Posts: 493
|
|
9 October 2014, 08:05 PM | #15 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,397
|
Keep your eyes on the for sale section. They do pop up.
|
9 October 2014, 09:14 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Adam
Location: UK
Watch: 124273
Posts: 831
|
|
9 October 2014, 10:29 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: North Idaho
Posts: 102
|
I have the 39 mm and love it. Shortly after acquiring it, I wanted another Rolex, different, but similar than the Expl.
I picked up a white dialed Airking, albeit smaller case, but still looked great on my 7" + wrist. You may not really gain much by re buying what you already have. Get something different. just my .2 |
9 October 2014, 11:19 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: MI
Posts: 812
|
Tourneau in NYC has a used 114270 for sale right now
|
10 October 2014, 01:32 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Sac Valley, CA US
Watch: Patek 5980/1A
Posts: 2,860
|
Since wearing 38mm and up on most days, I'm finding my preference shift away from the 36's. Case in point, I just cut loose a mint G-serial Turnograph Datejust I thought was too small. I basically tried it on 3-4 times, wore it all day once, and watched it spin on the winder as if I'd wear it again.
I spent $350 for that privilege:( |
10 October 2014, 05:57 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Adam
Location: UK
Watch: 124273
Posts: 831
|
Thanks for all of your comments.
I've found one in the UK which really hits the spot (looks like excellent condition Z serial with engraved rehaut, which is what I was after, and at a sensible price, although from an untrusted source) but I'm just beginning to doubt how I can possibly justify having more than 2 fine watches. My 214270 is my smart dress/work watch and my polar 16570 is for all other times. What possible reason do I have for buying another watch? Even if the Explorer remains, to my mind, the most perfect watch I've ever seen. Hmm... bit of a dilemma, to be honest. On the one hand, I'm thinking that the longer I leave getting the 36mm version, the less chance I'll ever have of getting one in excellent condition (not to mention the price going up), but on the other hand... I simply don't need it. I'm just thinking out loud... |
10 October 2014, 06:04 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,654
|
|
10 October 2014, 06:09 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Adam
Location: UK
Watch: 124273
Posts: 831
|
I don't need much convincing, Flavio
|
10 October 2014, 06:15 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: northern CA USA
Watch: 114270 Explorer
Posts: 477
|
|
10 October 2014, 06:17 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Adam
Location: UK
Watch: 124273
Posts: 831
|
|
10 October 2014, 06:42 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,654
|
|
10 October 2014, 06:44 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Adam
Location: UK
Watch: 124273
Posts: 831
|
Nuts! This story has pushed me over the edge, so to speak...
http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=376488 |
10 October 2014, 06:54 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Adam
Location: UK
Watch: 124273
Posts: 831
|
I've just submitted an offer. Let's see what fate has in store...
|
10 October 2014, 10:02 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: canada
Watch: me post!
Posts: 3,804
|
no but i would love to add a 39mm exp to my lineup
|
11 October 2014, 06:36 PM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 158
|
Sorry. Don't own either (yet). Due to collect my 214270 on Tuesday. Tried on both 114270 and 214270 when deciding. I've been wearing a 1966 Seamaster for a year (absolutely love that watch) so reckoned the 39mm would feel too big and the 36mm would feel right but I was wrong. The 114270 felt small on my wrist. 3mm made a huge difference in my opinion although not sure if it would be enough to justify the purchase of two very similar models. ImageUploadedByTapatalk1413016371.946669.jpg
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
11 October 2014, 10:39 PM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Bruce
Location: Alexandria, VA
Watch: EXP II, DJ,PP5066
Posts: 1,597
|
No just this
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
__________________
Bruce, 16570 Explorer II, DJ 16234 DJ 16013, 6466, 1947 Rolex Oyster, JLC Grande Reverso 976, PP 5066, Ellipse, Omega Seamaster |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.