ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
3 January 2015, 12:57 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: David
Location: New England
Posts: 1,888
|
Opinions on a Datejust
I'm very new to he idea of a DJ and found one that has caught my eye. I'm curious the opinions of the group as to it's condition and if there's anything "off" about it that I should be aware of. Clearly not mint, but this would be a regular every day office watch.
|
3 January 2015, 12:58 AM | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kingstown
Posts: 58,279
|
The Datejust is a great everyday office watch.
|
3 January 2015, 12:59 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: David
Location: New England
Posts: 1,888
|
And
|
3 January 2015, 01:00 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: David
Location: New England
Posts: 1,888
|
Last
|
3 January 2015, 01:01 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Real Name: Steve
Location: USA
Watch: A few
Posts: 8,881
|
|
3 January 2015, 01:15 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Rob
Location: Concordville, Pa
Watch: DSSD DJII PAM 005
Posts: 1,677
|
I bought a BNIB from an AD DJ in 2008, white stick dial, wore it a month or so, and then I found a U Serial Sub for sale locally, bought it and wore it everyday until I traded it in as part f the deal for my DSSD. After getting the DSSD I wanted a DJ again, but I tried on the DJII 41mm, fell in love with it, and now I wear the DJII more than the DSSD.
While the DJ 36mm is a classic design and a great watch, I liked the bigger size of the Sub and for me the 41mm DJII is great. Try both on and see which you like more, you can get a DJII here from a seller and save. The only downfall is the DJII does not come in white with Romans, just a stick dial.
__________________
My Collection.... 2012 DSSD G Series 116660; 2013 SS DJII 116300 (Stolen), 2010 G Serial GMTiiC 116710, V Serial Milgauss White Dial 2005 H Series PAM 005, 2018 Speedy Pro |
3 January 2015, 01:21 AM | #7 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 34,996
|
Quote:
|
|
3 January 2015, 01:30 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: David
Location: New England
Posts: 1,888
|
Thanks guys. I like both to be honest and will be visiting a local AD later today for comparison to be sure. My question was more focused on the specific watch posted. I'm generally one to buy most pre-owned items in person and not accustomed to spot major issues online.
|
3 January 2015, 01:39 AM | #9 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: NY
Watch: 116610 SubC
Posts: 216
|
Quote:
Well Rolex74 hit on all the GREAT points. I just (literally) bought the same exact DJ for my wife for Christmas. A classic in every way and will stand the test of time. BUT for me the 36mm is just too small. It is PERFECT for my wife and she loves it and it looks absolutely beautiful on her wrist. For me, my next grail is the DJII 116300 with white or black stick dial and smooth bezel. HTH and good luck........either way you are on your way to a classic Rolex with any DJ. |
|
3 January 2015, 02:39 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Andrew
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 557
|
The Datejust line is one of my favorites. Such a beautiful, versatile piece that is just as comfortable dressed up in a suit as it is in jeans and a polo.
I, too, prefer the larger size of the DJII. I highly recommend trying both on at the AD, then search for the right one "lightly used" from one of our trusted sellers. |
3 January 2015, 02:55 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Thailand
Watch: No date sub 11460
Posts: 133
|
|
3 January 2015, 03:02 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Andrew
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 557
|
|
3 January 2015, 03:04 AM | #13 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: USA
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 6,086
|
i think this DJ might have the wrong clasp? I may be mistaken, but my wife's 116200 has the updated clasp and from what I recall the 16200 had the old clasp (like in the photo) but had brushed center links. If you are looking at a 16200 then it could be that you have a watch that was altered
|
3 January 2015, 03:20 AM | #14 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: David
Location: New England
Posts: 1,888
|
Quote:
|
|
3 January 2015, 03:24 AM | #15 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: USA
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 6,086
|
With the 116200 model (not sure exactly what year), maybe this was the last of the bunch being an F serial, but Rolex never polished the center links of a 16200. Not the biggest deal, but I would prefer a stock Rolex if I was buying pre-owned.
|
3 January 2015, 03:50 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: David
Location: New England
Posts: 1,888
|
Not sure if the # here help determine if this is the correct bracelet?
|
3 January 2015, 04:23 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
|
Opinions on a Datejust
That bracelet has hollow end links...the case has polished lugs. Definitely a mismatch here.
It's possible someone polished the lugs... I'd steer clear of this watch and find a better stock example from a good seller. |
3 January 2015, 04:47 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: David
Location: New England
Posts: 1,888
|
Thanks guys
|
3 January 2015, 06:02 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: gary
Location: uk newcastle
Watch: SS Ceramic Sub
Posts: 504
|
Something not right here , polished lugs , polished centre links , should have solid end links . The bracelet should not have polished centre links with non solid end links etc etc .
Your money , your choice but I would steer clear of this one Just looked again and I think it is an older model 16200 that has been re polished to look like a 116200 , that said I would still steer clear . |
3 January 2015, 08:22 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: David
Location: New England
Posts: 1,888
|
Seller just confirmed he had it polished to look like that. Makes sense now. Not sure I'll go fr it, but at least I know now. Thanks!
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.