ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: Trade 16610 & 16610LV for 1680 Red? | |||
Yes | 51 | 38.93% | |
No | 80 | 61.07% | |
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 131. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
18 April 2015, 11:54 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Virginia
Watch: Subs, SD4K
Posts: 2,272
|
Trade or not?
I've got the potential to trade a late model 16610 Sub date and a 16610LV 50th anniversary Sub, both in immaculate condition, for a 1680 Sub Red in excellent condition that's guaranteed 100% authentic with original box and papers (unfortunately, no pictures to share). I'm waaaayyy tempted... what do you think??
__________________
Subaholics Anonymous |
18 April 2015, 11:57 AM | #2 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Fred
Location: NYC/NJ Metro Area
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 8,511
|
Really depends.. has the case been polished? how polished? Serial vs. the dial match (period correct?) Original insert and pearl? How is the patina? Does it match completely? Any erosion on the hands?
You will need to check a lot of boxes before contemplating this trade. I would read through this basic primer first: http://rolex.watchprosite.com/show-f...ti-649211/s-0/ |
18 April 2015, 11:59 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tom
Location: In a race car!
Watch: ME RACE PORSCHES
Posts: 24,123
|
I wouldn't, but then again I have no desire to acquire the red sub. If that is what floats your boat then go for it
|
18 April 2015, 12:01 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: NYC / Milan
Watch: 6263
Posts: 3,938
|
vintage and modern are very different experiences for sure
|
18 April 2015, 12:09 PM | #5 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Virginia
Watch: Subs, SD4K
Posts: 2,272
|
Quote:
__________________
Subaholics Anonymous |
|
18 April 2015, 12:13 PM | #6 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Fred
Location: NYC/NJ Metro Area
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 8,511
|
This beauty has very even matching patina which is important to me:
|
18 April 2015, 12:16 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Singapore
Posts: 769
|
If its a very good condition Red, i would go for it, afterall its easier to source for lv and 16610 if one day you missed them both.
|
18 April 2015, 12:17 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Dave
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,181
|
As much as I love a good 1680, I would not do that trade. Add a 1680 white for half the price.
|
18 April 2015, 12:29 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/Tudor Divers
Posts: 7,973
|
I don't think I could do that trade. Box / papers aren't important to me, and I think moneywise......you are losing a thousand or two. I wouldn't do it.
__________________
Best Regards, Jason Just Say "NO" to Polishing Card-Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch Curmudgeons LIfe is too short to wear inexpensive watches PLEXI IS SEXY |
18 April 2015, 12:30 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: PNW
Watch: DS,BLNR,SubLV,DJ2
Posts: 8,123
|
No.
|
18 April 2015, 12:38 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Craig
Location: Sydney
Watch: 4 Broken glass
Posts: 5,807
|
I dont think I would. Depends as well what will be your daily watch, cant see a red sub being that.
__________________
Day Date 118206, Daytona 116509 & 116505, AP 25859ST Gone but not forgotten and genuinely missed..... Root Beer GMT, Sub, TT Daytona, YG DD Bark, Datejust(2 his & hers), AP RO, PP Aquanaut, Lange 1, Heuer Monza, Piaget Altiplano, GP Chrono, Seamaster, Tudor Sub, Tudor Chrono, Tudor Black Bay Bronze |
18 April 2015, 02:15 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Willie
Location: Parkland,Fl.
Posts: 4,829
|
While I love the Red Sub don't think I would trade two relatively new watches for one that is over 40 years old... But that's me.
|
18 April 2015, 02:25 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Real Name: Jared
Location: Boston
Watch: AP 26401RO
Posts: 469
|
Meh, I don't think I'd trade them but that's just me and nobody's opinion matters like your own. Go with your gut!
__________________
- AP Royal Oak Offshore 26401RO - Rolex Yacht-Master II 116681 - Rolex GMT-2 116710BLNR |
18 April 2015, 02:32 PM | #14 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,243
|
That's a lot for some red ink, but the heart wants what the heart wants.
|
18 April 2015, 02:42 PM | #15 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Ed
Location: SoCal
Watch: ugiveiswatchuget
Posts: 9,048
|
Voted no. I wouldn't trade those two.
|
18 April 2015, 03:01 PM | #16 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Aliso Viejo, Ca
Watch: Timex
Posts: 668
|
No
|
18 April 2015, 03:28 PM | #17 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Syracuse
Posts: 4,089
|
I would. Red sub in excellent original condition with paperwork is a rare bird. Way way more rare than your 2 subs. If its a true full kit red sub then your looking at 17+. I cant see your subs worth anything close. My 2 cents.
|
18 April 2015, 06:16 PM | #18 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Idaho Falls, ID
Watch: Only the 114060
Posts: 380
|
I'd do the deal too. His two watches will slightly decline in value over the next few years while the red Sub will gain.
|
18 April 2015, 06:36 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/Tudor Divers
Posts: 7,973
|
Highly doubtful. Have you watched the asking price for a 16610LV on the forums for the last 4 years??!! I should have bought 10 of them. I could have made $15,000 - $20,000
__________________
Best Regards, Jason Just Say "NO" to Polishing Card-Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch Curmudgeons LIfe is too short to wear inexpensive watches PLEXI IS SEXY |
18 April 2015, 06:58 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: N/A
Posts: 679
|
|
18 April 2015, 07:48 PM | #21 |
TechXpert
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Earth
Posts: 23,628
|
The red sub is a stunning piece and I'm not a big fan of most modern Rolex watches, so I'd do the trade.
|
18 April 2015, 08:44 PM | #22 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: Mike
Location: BOS
Watch: 16710;14060;214270
Posts: 6,375
|
That would be a No for me.
|
18 April 2015, 08:56 PM | #23 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 26,846
|
|
18 April 2015, 09:34 PM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,132
|
|
18 April 2015, 09:36 PM | #25 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 77,711
|
|
18 April 2015, 09:36 PM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 347
|
|
18 April 2015, 09:38 PM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Paris, France
Watch: Dayto/5164
Posts: 1,631
|
I say yes but remember a vintage piece can not be worn near water. Thats why i have SD4K as a badass watch...
__________________
IG : @aka_karbo |
18 April 2015, 09:38 PM | #28 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,402
|
Take Fred's advice. If all boxes are checked then follow your heart.
|
18 April 2015, 09:40 PM | #29 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Bill
Location: NJ
Watch: Always changing
Posts: 4,172
|
Nope....rather have the two I would wear without concern vs 1 that is a collectors item
|
18 April 2015, 09:47 PM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Steve
Location: TO CAD, HCMC VN
Watch: MP 18946
Posts: 7,292
|
Giving up too much in that deal IMO
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.