ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

pospower · 24 April 2015, 01:38 PM

First I bought a gen 16622 gen platinum dial.

Brought to be installed on my Rolex. Watch mm aker damaged the face. He sent out to get repaired. Gave me back an entire ly different dial. Not even the same markings see swiss made vs swiss t>25. Also the dial is shiny not sandblasted like the original. Now question is the dial I got back even gen and if so what model is it for. Any help to get this rectified would be grateful. Top dial is the one I gave my watch maker and he sent to be repaired. The bottom is what came back.

1st is second dial even gen
2nd what model is it from?

Or is it just a horrible fix without the Rolex sandblasted finish.
Opinions from the experts please

waQstar · 24 April 2015, 01:40 PM

Wow, what a poor refinish if it's still on the original dial, I would not accept this, he should source a new untouched and unblemished dial.

Al1969 · 24 April 2015, 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by waQstar

Wow, what a poor refinish if it's still on the original dial, I would not accept this, he should source a new untouched and unblemished dial.

I completely agree. Talk about 'amauter hour'. Best of luck getting it rectified.

Runnin' Rebel · 24 April 2015, 03:35 PM

I'd be fuming if that happened. The textured sand blasted dial is what makes the the Yacht-Master for me. Most of it anyways

Good luck

Matt748 · 24 April 2015, 03:38 PM

The second dial is a Tritium dial???
Not Superlume and surely not an acceptable replacement based on that alone.

bayerische · 24 April 2015, 04:32 PM

No bueno.

Horrible re-print, basically ruin the value of your watch. Time to sort this out and then find a new watchmaker.

nmb · 24 April 2015, 11:09 PM

It looks very much like one of the cheap aftermarket dials seen on Ebay I am afraid.

Kind Regards

Nigel

Cryten · 25 April 2015, 12:57 AM

The printing looks terrible, that alone would suggest to me there is nothing Swiss about it.

Blong · 25 April 2015, 01:19 AM

Looks fake...that's not cool!

Furbo · 25 April 2015, 08:11 AM

He probably bought a terrible fake and took dial out.

crowncollection · 25 April 2015, 08:23 AM

Does it babe platinum markings on the back it's clearly a bad respray at least

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

T. Ferguson · 25 April 2015, 08:35 AM

Even if it is a genuine dial it is a tritium dial. Don't know for sure but I believe the older YM dials were not always sandblast finish. But in any event it's not original to your newer watch. And the text does not seem high quality at all, which leaves me doubting its authenticity altogether.

Bottom line is it is almost irrelevant whether it's real or fake, it's totally unacceptable even if it's a real Rolex dial. But I think it's fake anyway.

24 April 2015, 01:40 PM	#2
waQstar "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2012 Real Name: Walter A. Location: Sunny California Watch: 16760 Posts: 2,629	Wow, what a poor refinish if it's still on the original dial, I would not accept this, he should source a new untouched and unblemished dial. __________________ Our shadows taller than our soul........

24 April 2015, 03:35 PM	#4
Runnin' Rebel "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Real Name: Mark Location: 🤔 Posts: 8,424	I'd be fuming if that happened. The textured sand blasted dial is what makes the the Yacht-Master for me. Most of it anyways Good luck __________________ ♛

24 April 2015, 04:32 PM	#6
bayerische "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Real Name: Andreas Location: Margaritaville Watch: Smurf Posts: 19,879	No bueno. Horrible re-print, basically ruin the value of your watch. Time to sort this out and then find a new watchmaker. __________________ Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

25 April 2015, 08:23 AM	#11
crowncollection "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Real Name: David Location: australia Posts: 20,215	Does it babe platinum markings on the back it's clearly a bad respray at least Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ watches many

25 April 2015, 08:35 AM	#12
T. Ferguson "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2012 Location: Left Coast Posts: 7,025	Even if it is a genuine dial it is a tritium dial. Don't know for sure but I believe the older YM dials were not always sandblast finish. But in any event it's not original to your newer watch. And the text does not seem high quality at all, which leaves me doubting its authenticity altogether. Bottom line is it is almost irrelevant whether it's real or fake, it's totally unacceptable even if it's a real Rolex dial. But I think it's fake anyway. __________________ *Some days it's just not worth chewing through the restraints.*

24 April 2015, 03:38 PM	#5
Matt748 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2014 Location: London - UK Watch: Rolex Posts: 1,249	The second dial is a Tritium dial??? Not Superlume and surely not an acceptable replacement based on that alone.

24 April 2015, 11:09 PM	#7
nmb "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2011 Real Name: Nigel Location: uk Watch: 116618 LB Posts: 150	It looks very much like one of the cheap aftermarket dials seen on Ebay I am afraid. Kind Regards Nigel

25 April 2015, 12:57 AM	#8
Cryten "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2015 Location: Terrafirma Posts: 2,655	The printing looks terrible, that alone would suggest to me there is nothing Swiss about it.

25 April 2015, 01:19 AM	#9
Blong "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Real Name: Brian Location: Manhattan Watch: 116520 Black Posts: 287	Looks fake...that's not cool!

25 April 2015, 08:11 AM	#10
Furbo "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2012 Location: Slovenia, EU Watch: BLNR Posts: 1,507	He probably bought a terrible fake and took dial out.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)