![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
![]() |
#1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: NYC
Posts: 122
|
Panerai Selection
Question for the group, if I where to only have one Panerai in my rotation, yes your probably saying that's crazy I'll want more! But if I where to have only one and my requirements where:
44mm stainless steel 1950 case domed crystal manual wind Is my best option a 233 regardless of weather I want GMT or not? Thanks in advance. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
__________________
Bugsy |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Fred
Location: NYC/NJ Metro Area
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 8,514
|
233 - It is hard to go wrong with the domed glass and sleek fiddy case.. SOLID.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: CET
Posts: 35,629
|
Tough to beat the 233, but you could look at the 311 or 317, too, with a couple others if you want PM.
No matter if it's your only PAM or one of many, get the one one now that you like most. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: NYC
Watch: Me now
Posts: 19,439
|
233
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: NYC
Posts: 122
|
Is the 311 domed?
__________________
Bugsy |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 26,846
|
Go 233
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,950
|
Has to be 233. I asked myself the very same question and ended up with my 233 until I bumped the case size up to 47mm.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: NYC
Posts: 122
|
^thanks. 47 is above my tolerance. 233 sounds like the way to go.
__________________
Bugsy |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
|
233 is the way to go at 44mm.
If you do go to 47mm then the 422 comes into play, or the 372 if you want a Base model (two hands only).
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Oregon
Posts: 7,399
|
Probably 233. I'd own one, except the damn fang just bothers me.
__________________
Rolex / Panerai / Omega |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 66
|
270!
winding gets old after the honeymoon |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Brian
Location: NJ
Watch: Pam Patek Rolex AP
Posts: 794
|
I think this is your best and ONLY option that checks all your boxes...
Aside from that 212, 213 are the next closest in terms of looks but are not manual. 233 is an excellent choice. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.