|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
2 June 2015, 04:03 AM
|
#1 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: New York City
Posts: 110
|
Pam 112, 560 or 392
Which one and why? I can't go bigger than 44mm...
|
|
|
|
2 June 2015, 04:23 AM
|
#2 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
|
112 over 560
183 over 392 210 or 232(47mm) over them all! ;-) EDIT: I prefer the 6497 motor in the 112, 183, 392, 210, 232.
__________________
member#3242 |
|
|
|
|
2 June 2015, 05:21 AM
|
#3 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Real Name: Brian
Location: San diego
Watch: Patek 5167
Posts: 160
|
Do not forget about the 177
|
|
|
|
|
2 June 2015, 05:29 AM
|
#4 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Socal
Posts: 4,977
|
I went through something similar and ended up with a 510, cause for a 8-day movement, I want a running second hand. And I like the new "6". :)
__________________
135 ├┼┼╕ 246 R |
|
|
|
|
2 June 2015, 10:55 PM
|
#5 |
|
2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: CET
Posts: 35,629
|
i can see you comparing 112 and 560, but unsure why the 392 is in the mix? a different animal in terms of case (1950s) and functions (date + seconds hand).
anyway, of those three, i would go for the 112, though, if i wanted a base that's under 47 mm and not vintage, i would probably compare it against the 000 (logo), 210 (base looks great in rad form to me), 390 (gold hands) or 562 (Ti + chocolate dial). |
|
|
|
|
3 June 2015, 01:30 AM
|
#6 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 26,846
|
Buy 112 clean and easy fix in case
|
|
|
|
|
11 June 2015, 11:51 AM
|
#7 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 161
|
Im a fan of the 392
|
|
|
|
|
11 June 2015, 12:07 PM
|
#8 |
|
2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,763
|
112
000 111 all solid choices.
__________________
|
|
|
|
11 June 2015, 07:12 PM
|
#9 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: JP
Location: USA
Watch: All of them!
Posts: 917
|
My only comment is the 392 felt small (for a PAM) when I tried it on. Also I felt like there was something unbalanced witht the CG and the case size. It's a great piece, but I prefer the 312.
__________________
********************************* "Eveyone has a plan until they get punched in the face." Instagram: @30threejosh |
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
