![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
![]() |
#1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 233
|
Went in to buy a 15202. Came out needing to save some more money..
This is obviously not the Boutique, and the 15202 he has was a sealed and packed watch which the guy was really not wanting to open and remove. They usually sell the jumbo that way apparently.
Anyways I have tried it on before, I knew it was slightly big but said I could live with it. He did have a 15300 which I tried on. The links were already removed and I just couldn't help but feel that the watch didn't sit as nicely as I like. The gap between the lugs was annoying me, and he assured me that the 15202 would be exactly the same. I absolutely love the dial, the bracelet is something that I have been wanting for a long time, but I can't stand the look where the watch doesn't sit. Moving on I found another piece. The PP 5711. The first time for me to see in the flesh, and I was blown away completely. Have yet to try this beauty in blue, but the way she sits on my wrists, the light weight of the watch, the dial, the PCL, EVERYTHING. I really really like the white honestly, but I have to try and find the blue before pulling the trigger. And here we are again.. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 233
|
and BOOM
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: ATX
Posts: 2,887
|
Awesome to find what you really want. Can you explain the lug gap?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 233
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: ATX
Posts: 2,887
|
I gotcha. Yeah on your wrist shape for sure that would bug me
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 233
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Serg
Location: US of A
Watch: AP
Posts: 7,437
|
Agree. 5711 looks a bit better on you.
__________________
How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer meat???? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: ...
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 4,466
|
15450 at 37mm would be a better fit.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: US
Posts: 596
|
5711
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: SMD
Location: LGA/EWR/ORD
Watch: AP/PP
Posts: 3,711
|
Looks like the watch you tried on was the 15400 not 15300, which wears significantly larger than the 15202. But glad you got what you wanted, but what you tried on was not representative of the 15202.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,950
|
5711 > 15202
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Mike G
Location: Ohio
Watch: Rolex-Patek-AP
Posts: 3,080
|
This is a GREAT post and exactly why all of us should try them on before buying. I have a 6.5" wrist and definitely want to make a Royal Oak work but unfortunately it just doesn't fit the shape of my wrist. I was in the AP Boutique in Florence and tried on the 15202 in Rose and pointed out the gap to the manager and he agreed that it did not fit me well and sadly was not the right piece for me. Many Sales Associates will always tell you that the watch looks great just to make the sale but I could really appreciate his honesty and professionalism. I own a Blue 5711 and it fits perfect. Happy Hunting my friend!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Real Name: Steve
Location: Indiana
Watch: PP/AP/VC
Posts: 2,179
|
Another option would be a VC Overseas although probably most would rank it below the PP and AP. But like the PP, the VCs bracelet is very flexible and conforms better to your wrist. The APs bracelet is a lot of things, but flexible is not one of its qualities
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: usa
Posts: 19,653
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 233
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 233
|
Quote:
Going to try the jumbo anyway in 2 days but I've been assured that it sits exactly the same and I will have the same problems as in the pics. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: SMD
Location: LGA/EWR/ORD
Watch: AP/PP
Posts: 3,711
|
Okay, must have been the angle but it looked like the double batons at 12. Still don't think the 15300 fits the same as the 15202. Same case diameter at 39mm, but thicker movement and slightly thicker bracelet. May not make enough of a difference though.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: singapore
Posts: 189
|
whats your wrist size? i actually think that the royal oak suits u fine
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Ben
Location: SIN & JKT
Watch: Rolex, AP, PP
Posts: 9,874
|
While I much prefer Jumbo over 5711, I think in your case, the 5711 is a much better fit.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,131
|
I'm looking to add a Jumbo as well. I currently have a 5726 so for me a 15202 makes more sense than a 5711. I had the opportunity to try the Jumbo on recently and to me it seemed a good fit.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Oregon
Posts: 7,399
|
The PP looks better on you. How would they have a 15300 in stock? Is it used or something?
__________________
Rolex / Panerai / Omega |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 37,613
|
Can't go wrong with either but I prefer the naut for the screw down crown, quickset and such. May still add the 15202 at some point.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: David
Location: Australia
Posts: 321
|
have both, but jumbo > 5711 for me
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: US
Posts: 3,258
|
I think the 5711 is a bit more comfy, but the 15202/15400 look better, IMO. Mostly due to the bracelet shimmer.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 233
|
I will be sure to let you know. Thanks for the response.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 233
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 233
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Alex
Location: Chicago
Watch: AP,PP, Rolex
Posts: 37,156
|
I love my 5711, the bracelet is amazing on the wrist. It drapes as opposed to the Royal oak which fits closer to bracelet.
__________________
Instagram: @Hairdude Watches in Collection 5070R, 5522A, 214270 MK1, 228238 16750, 26401, 5711, 116718, 116710LN, 116300, 16710"Coke", 372, 15300, 15703 (All Flipped) Official Member "Perpetual 30" Las Vegas GTG 2016 Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2017 Official Member 'WIS-CON' Las Vegas Int'l GTG 2018 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,131
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Dubai
Watch: bipolar
Posts: 2,854
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.