ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
14 July 2015, 05:04 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Boston
Posts: 19
|
5508 for your review
Hi All,
Wondering your expert opinions on the below 5508? Seller claims that the only thing that has been replaced is the insert, but wanted to check with you. Best, Mike |
14 July 2015, 05:15 AM | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Greg
Location: michigan
Watch: Rolex Oyster
Posts: 4,046
|
Dial looks good, rare to see the exclamation point. Crowns possibly replaced, can't really tell from pics. Overall looks like an honest example that shouldn't be too hard to bring back to original.just need to factor the insert price.
|
14 July 2015, 05:32 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Boston
Posts: 19
|
Thanks for the review Andromeda. Here is a closeup of the crown. Does it look replaced?
|
14 July 2015, 06:58 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Belgium
Posts: 2,239
|
Replacing that insert will cost you ... A rib
|
14 July 2015, 07:01 AM | #5 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Greg
Location: michigan
Watch: Rolex Oyster
Posts: 4,046
|
Post 60, yes. pre 60 should be a " plus " crown I believe
|
14 July 2015, 08:28 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 677
|
No, Brevet "+" only on pre-1957 crowns.
The hands are probably re-done or fully replaced. As you have noted, the insert is not the original type, and likely not original Rolex. The watch looks a little bleak overall, the markers are mostly flattened, and color of the dial not very lively or compelling. The watch is fine, I guess, just not anything to chase at a high price, in my opinion. Michael |
14 July 2015, 09:28 AM | #7 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Greg
Location: michigan
Watch: Rolex Oyster
Posts: 4,046
|
Quote:
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.