ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
20 July 2015, 03:14 AM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: UK
Posts: 155
|
Infarctions.
I have just received 6 infractions (or something like that) for posting a question today about ...........( I am now not able to say). I also in the thread referred to the new Rolex movement and its 14 patents, it's new escapement wheel and the 72 hour reserve. All of which will IMO keep the movement 'pure' I cannot say exactly what I mean without adding more infarctions. As Tools seems to be a fair Moderator would he please give his opinion?
|
20 July 2015, 03:15 AM | #2 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SRQ
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 64,133
|
You posted a thread on fakes and did so knowingly. Now you post this...Guess what happens next?
PS. Knew you would push it and secondly what the heck is an infarction? PSS:Your exact thread: Topic: Why should'nt we discuss clones Just a few moments ago, an interest thread appeared from a Singapore member discussing the recent numbers of fxxx Rolexes. I had just finished a reply saying the new 3255 movement with it's 14 patents and new components made using a new technique would possibly defeat this movement being cloned. IMO We need to discuss clones on this forum (or do we just bury our heads in the sand), so as to be able to avoid one when buying a used 'Rolex' Oh and as for fair moderator giving you infraction with clear explanation of why was quite fair. Had you truly made mistake without knowing different story and a simple warning. Clearly you knew as previous thread was removed and then you post one with topic why shouldn't we discuss clones not to mention this one.
__________________
SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT |
20 July 2015, 03:19 AM | #3 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kingstown
Posts: 58,277
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.