ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: Have you reached for gold yet? | |||
Steel rules! | 162 | 42.52% | |
Testing the temperature with two tone. | 52 | 13.65% | |
I've got the Midas touch. | 121 | 31.76% | |
Gold? Ha! Platinum baby! | 46 | 12.07% | |
Voters: 381. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
26 July 2015, 03:28 AM | #1 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
|
Journey to precious metals
So I've noticed a lot of love for PMs lately (I've given up hope of converting Peter). I was wondering how everyone arrived at their love for gold/platinum?
I started off with steel and thought gold was too heavy for me. Why pay so much more for a gold case with the same movement as a steel model right? It never occurred to me that while the FUNCTION was the same, the FEELING it imparts is so much more different. Given the fact that I buy and love watches more for the FEELING it gives me than any real utility/FUNCTION, it's now a bigger factor in my buying than previously. What about you? |
26 July 2015, 03:35 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Real Name: Cal
Location: Seattle, WA.
Watch: explorer
Posts: 658
|
I'm currently coming up with a scheme to get a white gold sub\Daytona\DD to scratch that very itch!
|
26 July 2015, 03:43 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: SNA
Posts: 3,635
|
Not quite there yet, but warming up to it.
Mostly because certain models have something the steel versions don't, such as the Smurf Sub with the blue dial and bezel, or the BLRO GMT with the red/blue bezel and red hand. |
26 July 2015, 03:47 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: ca
Posts: 94
|
Hi OP I think you make a great point. My everyday watch is SS subdate and I love it. For what you had said. It's function. Lightweight yet strong. I'm not worried to scuff it up a bit or get it dirty with soap, grit, or baby drool. (Just had my first son 5 months ago.). So one could suffice I look at this watch for its function, durability and practicality. Now... I've preordered the dd 40 in platinum. The weight of the watch when I had the chance to try it on blew my mind. It will be my first platinum watch and the FEELING of the weight and knowing it is really a top of the line watch from Rolex, and a goal of mine to have hold more value than the sheer function of the watch in my mind. Although the new 3255 movement is pretty sweet function. But anyways. Nice post and thanks for letting me give my 2cents!
P.s linked a pic of my soon to be baby. I love summer but September can't come fast enough!! ImageUploadedByTapatalk1437846395.222610.jpg Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
26 July 2015, 03:49 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Cambridge, NY
Posts: 1,089
|
This is a great question...
I'm one of those people who looks at a watch on my wrist to just enjoy it without even noticing the time so I'm hooked from that standpoint. I have wrestled with the precious metal question for years and just can't bring myself to "take the plunge". My parents were literally dirt poor when I was growing up so I'm probably still affected by that. I did own and enjoy a TT Datejust and sometimes wish I still owned it. The closest I came was about seven years ago when I was in the process of purchasing an IWC Big Pilot. My AD had just received a white gold version and asked me what I thought. I have never come so close in my entire life to just instantly giving in to the urge to buy it on the spot. The weight, the look, the details were just stunning to me. Honestly, I actually regret not buying it and I can see a point where I will "give in" and buy a precious metal piece when the right one comes along.
|
26 July 2015, 04:02 AM | #6 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Stratosphere
Posts: 1,993
|
Quote:
I have zero love for the watch because it is a PM; In fact if i'm being honest, I prefer SS a lot more because it is much lighter. The only reason I put it under consideration is because I love the 116619 Smurf. I have always had a thing for blue, and that is the only reason I considered it. I ended up getting a Patek 5711 instead though. Yellow or rose gold, even two tones are not for me however. Not a fan of the bling at all. I feel like even people that otherwise have zero interest in watches notice it, and that is something I dislike personally. I am only 25 however, so that may change. All the best! |
|
26 July 2015, 04:04 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,132
|
My first Rolex was a flat blue TT SubC. Since then I've acquired a RG DDII, YG SubC LN and a YG GMTII. I will admit that gold was addictive and I can definitely understand what you're saying about how it feels. Unless you've worn one, you just don't understand the small but big differences between solid 18kt vs TT or steel. I tend to not wear my gold Rolexes to work because I think it would be poor taste, so I typically wear my SS watches. My new favorite is a SubC ND. It may be the most comfortable watch I own. I think I'm good with (3) gold Rolexes and IMHO, Rolex makes the highest value PM watch. Don't get me wrong. I'm not say they make the best PM watch, I'm saying you get a lot of watch for relatively low cost com paired to PP for example.
|
26 July 2015, 04:06 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Watch Dealer atm!
Watch: all
Posts: 2,800
|
I prefer the look of white gold to steel (can really notice a difference) regardless of the different dial choices and prestige of owning precious metal
|
26 July 2015, 04:07 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: San Fran
Posts: 2,218
|
I only go gold or PM when the style or brand does not come in steel--
Journe and Lange… Of course some of the rolex styles i like do not come in steel. But when given a choice-- steel rules and how i voted. The reason is steel is more resistant to scratching and yellow or red gold is more formal and I am a casual guy who likes to stay under the radar |
26 July 2015, 04:08 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tom
Location: In a race car!
Watch: ME RACE PORSCHES
Posts: 24,123
|
well Mike I must admit I feel the same way you do. once I felt a YG sub, I was just amazed at its feel, look, weight and wrist presence. once I got my first PM watch, I must admit it made the SS watches feel like toys. I lost all desire to wear SS watches because the joy of PM the weight, feel and look is just overwhelming. obviously everyone doesn't share my sentiments
but for the few who do and know and understand what I (we) are talking about they understand now my problem is my obsession with Platinum!! the Platonas look weight and feel trumps my gold watches and now really prefer Platinum over all other metals. my next watch will probably be the DD40. wishing for a Platinum sub!! Yes I still have all the versions of SS Rolex watches, but they just don't do it for me anymore I am down to wearing only these three, kids have all the SS ... here is what my "journey" resulted in.... and many along the ways.... |
26 July 2015, 04:08 AM | #11 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,132
|
Quote:
You're 25 and you have a Patek 5711!! I'd bet that your taste will change! I agree with your comment about the weight. The gold sub is WAY heavier, but that's also what I like about it. I tried on a RG AP Jumbo and didn't like it because to me, the weight didn't make sense, if that makes any sense. IMHO gold Rolexes seem more balanced due to the bracelet weight vs the weight of the watch. Last edited by rebel_1; 26 July 2015 at 04:10 AM.. Reason: Typo |
|
26 July 2015, 04:12 AM | #12 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,132
|
Quote:
|
|
26 July 2015, 04:14 AM | #13 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Ed
Location: SoCal
Watch: ugiveiswatchuget
Posts: 9,048
|
I could never rock any YG watch. Personally I think it just doesn't look good on me. WG is ok and so is Platinum but it's just too rich for my blood.
|
26 July 2015, 04:19 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tom
Location: In a race car!
Watch: ME RACE PORSCHES
Posts: 24,123
|
|
26 July 2015, 04:26 AM | #15 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Stratosphere
Posts: 1,993
|
Quote:
It probably will. I have slowed down and removed most my pieces from my collection, sold a Hublot I quickly rushed on my initial days of getting into watches. I have got them down to a BLNR (which I am certain will never go anywhere as it has much sentimental value and is my work watch), and my recent 5711 which I am over the moon about. At least I know if I do change my mind, or if my taste changes, she is going to be easy to flip/sell. What a watch though I must say! The RG 15202 Royal Oak is one of the most stunning watches I have ever seen personally!! What a stunning watch with that blue dial! |
|
26 July 2015, 04:36 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Middle
Posts: 878
|
I never thought of precious metals until the DD40 arrived. My next watch might as well be one of those.
|
26 July 2015, 04:40 AM | #17 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Bill
Location: NJ
Watch: Always changing
Posts: 4,172
|
I'm with you...both the smurf and BLRO have been quietly nagging at me. But I just can't justify the money in my head.
|
26 July 2015, 04:44 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: US
Posts: 3,257
|
Went from SS, to RG, and also have TT now. Love all 3 types. Certain models just look the best in certain metals.
|
26 July 2015, 04:45 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Jay
Location: TEXAS
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 7,648
|
I have had out of ten Rolexes six have been TT or 18k gold.
Next up I hope WG Daytona. |
26 July 2015, 04:49 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: Chrisstian
Location: Paris France
Watch: Daytona SS
Posts: 937
|
|
26 July 2015, 04:54 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Real Name: Steve
Location: Shasta
Watch: es..More Watches!
Posts: 2,414
|
There's just something about my PM (okay TT) that makes me feel accomplished and established. I always remember my dad rolling around with a gold watch. It just has a different allure to me that I can't describe. No one has every complimented my SS pieces, but the TT bluesy, I get about one a week including, "I don't like Rolex, but man that's a beauty." There's just something about the gold that's eye drawing.
Last edited by WS9D; 26 July 2015 at 04:55 AM.. Reason: Spelling. Darn ifone auto erect |
26 July 2015, 05:03 AM | #22 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2013
Location: uk
Posts: 487
|
Never ever had anything gold before.... Not even a dental filling
But fairly obsessed about 2 refs for a while now.... Went and tried them on today..... Think this could be a reality soon.... It'd be an "all in" move... And as such I see it as a kind've evolution - through the ranks - culminating in "the best" (single watch) I can afford.... (For now) |
26 July 2015, 05:15 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Brian
Location: Northern Virginia
Watch: One of Not Many
Posts: 17,892
|
My Lange 1815 is in rose gold, that is it other than vintage pieces.
I prefer my sport model watches in stainless steel.
__________________
IWC Portugieser 7 Day, Omega Seamaster SMP300m, Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete Calendar, Glashutte PanoInverse, Glashutte SeaQ Panorama Date, Omega Aqua Terra 150, Omega CK 859, Omega Speedmaster 3861 Moonwatch, Breitling Superocean Steelfish, JLC Atmos Transparent Clock |
26 July 2015, 05:15 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,723
|
I can't decide. I keep going back and forth, back and forth, back and forth.
I feel like I can't do a YG watch. I love the look, but to much attention that I don't want. WG and Pt, why not. I just wonder if it'll satisfy me finally. I want a watch that will do that. Not sure I'll find it.
__________________
member#3242 |
26 July 2015, 05:23 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Sweden
Watch: 16570
Posts: 7,315
|
I went with "steels rules" much because Rolex is where it is right now 100% thanks to the SS offerings. All the legacy and myth is based upon SS. Next up I'm looking at an AP, and SS saved that company once upon a time, so I'm going SS once more.
|
26 July 2015, 05:49 AM | #26 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,368
|
Quote:
I only had one SS Rolex when I joined but now have 3 and a 4th on the way hopefully and the great pics and classy manner of guys like you Mike, Ken, Tom and Larry have made buying and owning and sharing them a real joy. |
|
26 July 2015, 05:51 AM | #27 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,368
|
Quote:
|
|
26 July 2015, 05:56 AM | #28 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,368
|
I know how you feel, I never thought I'd own one either when I joined here. Best thing to do is look at the prices of all gold PPs and APs and gradually the price of Rolexes don't seem that bad, even representing good value and bang for your buck, esp if you buy from a trusted at a healthy discount.
|
26 July 2015, 06:11 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: USA
Watch: SubC LV
Posts: 1,821
|
Got in love for DD40. Not sure if it's worth the money. Perfect piece and timeless with incredible movement. Funny you raised the topic. Not sure how much value they hold(or say how much they loose) compared to SS?! Help convince me please.
|
26 July 2015, 06:15 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: San Francisco
Watch: BLRO
Posts: 502
|
I'm on the "Steel Rules!" train right now but definitely thinking about testing the TT waters out some more
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.