ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
13 August 2015, 06:26 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: England
Watch: Exp 2 polar white
Posts: 1,147
|
Explorer 2 vs sub
Hi new to forum not yet an owner but a watch lover. I have always liked and loved rolex.... In the shop windows. So as my first one I am looking at the 42 explorer 2 or a sub....hulk. what do you think any other suggestions for me to look at?
|
13 August 2015, 06:33 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: FL
Watch: platinum sub
Posts: 15,884
|
114060, 116610 or blrn
|
13 August 2015, 06:35 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: ny
Watch: sub-c Date
Posts: 1,321
|
nothing beats the submariner with a date
|
13 August 2015, 06:39 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: John
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 982
|
Everything beats a submarine so Explorer II FTW!!
|
13 August 2015, 06:40 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tom
Location: In a race car!
Watch: ME RACE PORSCHES
Posts: 24,123
|
those are both great watches, also would look at the Daytona and the GMT
|
13 August 2015, 06:41 AM | #6 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: HR
Location: Planet Earth
Watch: -ing Barts.
Posts: 4,244
|
sub
|
13 August 2015, 06:51 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: tom
Location: northern ireland
Watch: my fins
Posts: 10,063
|
welcome to the forum ,,,, its more just a case , of which order to pick them up in ...
|
13 August 2015, 06:51 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Texas
Watch: Grandpa's Tissot
Posts: 733
|
Rule #1 get what u like. Try as many models on your wrist as possible and see which one "fits" your wrist, style, and budget.
I think a Sub is always a great choice. I would also suggest a Daytona, but they are a bit more expensive. Both models are versatile in my view. Take your time, the search is part of the experience. Good Luck |
13 August 2015, 06:54 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,654
|
Try both and get the one you prefer.
|
13 August 2015, 06:57 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Chris
Location: UK
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 739
|
Welcome to the forum. For your first purchase just take your time and do a bit of research into the watches you like. If you can you should go and try them on, what looks good in the window may not look so good on the wrist. Take a quick snap of what they look like on your wrist so you can view it at your leisure without someone trying to push you one way or the other.
Good luck with your choice.
__________________
Seiko RAF Gen 1 Chrono Black Bay Red Submariner 114060 Daytona 116520 |
13 August 2015, 07:10 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: UK
Watch: 16610 LV
Posts: 135
|
|
13 August 2015, 07:17 AM | #12 | |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Tim
Location: Pennsylvania
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 72,135
|
Quote:
__________________
Rolex Submariner 14060M Omega Seamaster 2254.50 DOXA Professional 1200T Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons TRF's "After Dark" Bar & NightClub Patron P Club Member #17 2 FA ENABLED
|
|
13 August 2015, 07:19 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: England
Watch: Exp 2 polar white
Posts: 1,147
|
I am thinking along them lines but white explorer first.
|
13 August 2015, 08:26 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Real Name: John
Location: New York
Watch: ALL OF THEM
Posts: 260
|
No choice is wrong between those two. You need to see both on your wrist to finally know. You'll probably get them both eventually.
|
13 August 2015, 08:46 AM | #15 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,368
|
Blue YM is one to look out for too.
|
13 August 2015, 08:50 AM | #16 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Ed
Location: SoCal
Watch: ugiveiswatchuget
Posts: 9,050
|
|
13 August 2015, 08:52 AM | #17 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: RI
Watch: blusylvx2blnrsmpbb
Posts: 723
|
I have both and vote for the Exp II
|
13 August 2015, 09:43 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 976
|
Welcome. Subs a classic, the date versions a bit more prevalent. The GMT looks the same to most people, obviously it's another and usability all together. The EXP II especially in white is a bit of a standout, looks younger, but bigger, also gives you a second time zone. I suggest to try them all on, and while your at it, give the SDc a closer look as well. Even a bit more tool watch then the others. Mostly I would make a decision based on needs, date, second time zone, even Chiono (Daytona), them for wearability in your personal life, wearing a lot of dress shirts might make the SDc not a prime choice, a smaller wrist might not support the 42mm of an EXP II. Overall they're all great watches and would make a nice collection, have fun, the journey of finding your Rolex is just great. Congrats for the decision and post pictures once you aquired you favorite one...
|
13 August 2015, 10:17 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 343
|
You're asking about two very popular models. I tried on most of the new models and liked the 114060 Submariner the best. The WISEST thing you could do would be to visit an AD and try them out yourself. You'll know which one is the best.
|
13 August 2015, 10:56 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 690
|
Black Sub Date.
|
13 August 2015, 11:14 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Home
Posts: 1,438
|
A few back I would have immediately come with the model answer saying that the you can't go wrong with the sub. However after recently purchasing the Daytona, I felt that I probably left out a whole lot of cool models that to me were more to my taste.
I would just advise you to go and try them on and pick whichever one sings to you more. Do not be swayed by what people in the forum say. Get what you like. The Daytona hasn't left my wrist ever since and my hulk has been left in the drawer. Been over 2 months and honeymoon phase for the Daytona just isn't over
__________________
Royal Oak 15500ST Master Calendar METEORITE Q1552540 | Luminor GMT PAM 00335 Aquanaut 5167A-001 | Nautilus 5712/1A-001 Cosmograph DAYTONA 116520 | DEEPSEA 126660 | Explorer 214270 | GMT Master II BLRO 16710 | GMT Master II VTNR 126720 | Submariner LV 16610 | Sky-Dweller 326139 | Prince Oysterdate 90630 |
13 August 2015, 11:26 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: England
Watch: Exp 2 polar white
Posts: 1,147
|
|
13 August 2015, 11:47 AM | #23 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: RI
Watch: blusylvx2blnrsmpbb
Posts: 723
|
The Exp II has a better feel on my wrist for me it is my most comfortable watch that I own and the Polar dial is stunning . I purchased the Sub first as that was the Rolex that always spoke to me but as soon as I purchased the Exp II it has been my go to watch.
|
13 August 2015, 11:56 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 414
|
I had the same experience. On first consideration The sub seems like the quintessential sports watch, but the Exp II 42 mm is a cleaner, more sophisticated and versitile design.
|
13 August 2015, 12:03 PM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Matthew
Location: Miami/NY
Watch: the shoes.
Posts: 3,482
|
EXP 2 or Tudor Pelagos
|
13 August 2015, 12:07 PM | #26 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: NYC/South Fl
Watch: Rolex, Patek
Posts: 3,683
|
Sub is classic, in black. The green may be a little less versatile. The Exp II is great, a bit big but most wrists can pull it off. I would go Exp II....
|
13 August 2015, 12:16 PM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,550
|
ExpII 42MM is the more modern size/looks wise.
they are both my favorite, can't go wrong.
__________________
|
13 August 2015, 12:18 PM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: England
Watch: Exp 2 polar white
Posts: 1,147
|
I have small wrists and I have a 45mm on now so size is not a problem. I can see were this is going it's going to be a white explorer 216570
|
13 August 2015, 12:23 PM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Real Name: John
Location: New York
Watch: ALL OF THEM
Posts: 260
|
Or The first one I got was the sub. My first polar paved the way for my Daytona. I just re-aquired one and really love it. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
“Lose your dream, you lose your mind.” |
13 August 2015, 12:37 PM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 2
|
Just bought a Suc C date. Always wanted one and I like it, but my 42mm black dial Explorer II just feels more solid and versatile (if you don't meed the timer bezel). It is just a bit heavier which I like. I would pick old sub over old Explorer II for sure, but the new Exp II with 42 mm case, orange GMT hand and a date cyclopes is a home run.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.