ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

WAS · 8 January 2016, 08:14 PM

Yesterday I posted a thread about a Tudor 9411/0 with a questionable minute hand offered for sale by Meertz. Several people responded and the consensus was that at least the minute hand was not correct. I then called Meertz to discuss this issue. Although the intitial response I received on the phone when I pointed out the problem with the minute hand on this watch made it seem that Meertz did not care, I have since checked their website and indeed the listing is withdrawn. Thank you TRF and thank you Meertz for being an honorable dealer.

TimeToGo · 8 January 2016, 10:46 PM

I guess he did a 180 after his name is posted all over the net... Here is what you quoted his response to be:

"yes, it is possible that is not original," "yes, I know it is not correct, so don't buy the watch if you don't want to."

linesiders · 8 January 2016, 11:18 PM

Good they removed it - they should really have it verified for authenticity beyond just the hands

Quote:

Originally Posted by TimeToGo

I guess he did a 180 after his name is posted all over the net... Here is what you quoted his response to be:

"yes, it is possible that is not original,"

From my reading of his response on VRF this what the fellow from Meetz said.

Quote:

Originally Posted by TimeToGo

"yes, I know it is not correct, so don't buy the watch if you don't want to."

From my reading of his response on VRF this what the OP interpreted from what Meertz was saying.

"yes, it is possible that is not original," which I took to mean "yes, I know it is not correct, so don't buy the watch if you don't want to."

Not trying to say anything other than it appears Meertz did not state: "yes, I know it is not correct, so don't buy the watch if you don't want to."

TimeToGo · 8 January 2016, 11:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by linesiders

Not trying to say anything other than it appears Meertz did not state: "yes, I know it is not correct, so don't buy the watch if you don't want to."

You are correct!

linesiders · 9 January 2016, 12:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TimeToGo

You are correct!

Haha - I am painful on interpretations sometimes ;)

WAS · 9 January 2016, 07:27 AM

As pointed out above, Meertz never said they knew the hands were not correct, or "don't buy the watch if you don't want to." That was purely my interpretation. I don't want to criticize anyone unnecessarily and I am actually buying a different watch from Meertz. My interpretation of the response from Meertz could be from cultural or linguistic differences.

Tony

TimeToGo · 9 January 2016, 07:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WAS

As pointed out above, Meertz never said they knew the hands were not correct, or "don't buy the watch if you don't want to." That was purely my interpretation. I don't want to criticize anyone unnecessarily and I am actually buying a different watch from Meertz. My interpretation of the response from Meertz could be from cultural or linguistic differences.

Tony

Yes sir.. or quotal inferences..

8 January 2016, 08:14 PM	#1
WAS "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2015 Real Name: Anthony Location: Los Angeles Watch: Explorer 6610 Posts: 70	Praise for Meertz World of Time Yesterday I posted a thread about a Tudor 9411/0 with a questionable minute hand offered for sale by Meertz. Several people responded and the consensus was that at least the minute hand was not correct. I then called Meertz to discuss this issue. Although the intitial response I received on the phone when I pointed out the problem with the minute hand on this watch made it seem that Meertz did not care, I have since checked their website and indeed the listing is withdrawn. Thank you TRF and thank you Meertz for being an honorable dealer.

9 January 2016, 07:27 AM	#6
WAS "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2015 Real Name: Anthony Location: Los Angeles Watch: Explorer 6610 Posts: 70	Thanks for keeping the record straight. As pointed out above, Meertz never said they knew the hands were not correct, or "don't buy the watch if you don't want to." That was purely my interpretation. I don't want to criticize anyone unnecessarily and I am actually buying a different watch from Meertz. My interpretation of the response from Meertz could be from cultural or linguistic differences. Tony

8 January 2016, 10:46 PM	#2
TimeToGo 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: North Florida Posts: 16,710	I guess he did a 180 after his name is posted all over the net... Here is what you quoted his response to be: "yes, it is possible that is not original," "yes, I know it is not correct, so don't buy the watch if you don't want to."

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)