ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

kier333 · 14 January 2016, 04:01 AM

I am thinking about a px for the following watch and wanted to know people's thoughts on what the watch looks like condition wise.

I realise it's under RSC warrant but are the lugs over polished?

Link to the actual watch below:

http://www.watchfinder.co.uk/Rolex/S...332/item/56466

Thanks in advance

Robbyman · 14 January 2016, 04:03 AM

I have seen many they have that have been heavily polished with lugs narrower on one side than the other. I would check it out in person.

presario · 14 January 2016, 04:33 AM

Overpolished in my opinion. I'd look for another piece.

kier333 · 14 January 2016, 04:34 AM

Thanks for the reply.

I do intend to check it out first being going ahead with the PX, I was just looking for options prior to wasting my time going in.

kier333 · 14 January 2016, 04:42 AM

Yeah I thought it was over polished also, just wanted other opinions. I would be PX a 2005 unpolished full set Sea Dweller, I just want one that has lug holes and mine being for 05 doesn't!

AS1 · 14 January 2016, 04:43 AM

I would also pass.

Colin10101 · 14 January 2016, 04:48 AM

Looks pretty polished. Honestly, you could find better out there. The fact that the lugs on the Seadweller are already a bit thinner than the submariner makes me think you should hold out for an unpolished model

kirksingleton · 14 January 2016, 08:04 AM

Looks pretty polished

Daytona88 · 14 January 2016, 08:11 AM

pass

14 January 2016, 04:01 AM	#1
kier333 Banned Join Date: Dec 2012 Location: london Posts: 416	Advise on potential Sea Dweller Purchase I am thinking about a px for the following watch and wanted to know people's thoughts on what the watch looks like condition wise. I realise it's under RSC warrant but are the lugs over polished? Link to the actual watch below: http://www.watchfinder.co.uk/Rolex/S...332/item/56466 Thanks in advance

14 January 2016, 04:33 AM	#3
presario "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Andrew Location: Los Angeles Posts: 1,428	Overpolished in my opinion. I'd look for another piece. __________________

14 January 2016, 04:48 AM	#7
Colin10101 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2014 Real Name: Colin Location: Toronto Watch: 16710 Posts: 1,336	Looks pretty polished. Honestly, you could find better out there. The fact that the lugs on the Seadweller are already a bit thinner than the submariner makes me think you should hold out for an unpolished model __________________ Rolex GMT-Master II 16710 "Z" Serial COKE Montblanc 1858 Iced Sea *BLACK*

14 January 2016, 04:03 AM	#2
Robbyman "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2013 Location: Blighty (England) Watch: Daytona/Pepsi/Sub Posts: 1,517	I have seen many they have that have been heavily polished with lugs narrower on one side than the other. I would check it out in person.

14 January 2016, 04:34 AM	#4
kier333 Banned Join Date: Dec 2012 Location: london Posts: 416	Thanks for the reply. I do intend to check it out first being going ahead with the PX, I was just looking for options prior to wasting my time going in.

14 January 2016, 04:42 AM	#5
kier333 Banned Join Date: Dec 2012 Location: london Posts: 416	Yeah I thought it was over polished also, just wanted other opinions. I would be PX a 2005 unpolished full set Sea Dweller, I just want one that has lug holes and mine being for 05 doesn't!

14 January 2016, 04:43 AM	#6
AS1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2014 Location: NYC / Milan Watch: 6263 Posts: 3,938	I would also pass.

14 January 2016, 08:04 AM	#8
kirksingleton "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2015 Location: Seattle, WA Posts: 1,759	Looks pretty polished

14 January 2016, 08:11 AM	#9
Daytona88 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2015 Location: USA Watch: 5712 Posts: 2,614	pass

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)