The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Audemars Piguet Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 13 March 2016, 11:11 PM   #1
BlueIn2Red
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: UK
Posts: 219
Here's what I find strange about AP...

I'm now lucky enough to own my grail watch - the Royal Oak 15400 with blue dial, truly a fantastic piece which I can't stop looking at. However, although I have tremendous respect for AP, their history and what they stand for, there is no other AP watch that I really desire to own. The Offshore line especially I find ostentatious and often downright unpleasant in terms of design. It seems bizarre to me that the team of people that produce the elegant beauty of the RO can also produce some of those blingy Offshore monstrosities!

Of course it's not quite as simple as that, I do love watches like the 15202, but I have a limited budget so it would make no sense to me to buy that when I already own the 15400. Similarly I admire the ROC, but I'm not a great chrono user so for me it really just reduces the desirable simplicity of the classic three hand RO.

Rolex on the other hand is a brand I greatly admire, but don't really love (partly because of their often crass marketing, partly because of the "look at me" reputation the brand unfortunately has); yet I find I like and appreciate the vast majority of their watches ... only the really high end gold/diamond pieces do I truly dislike.

It's probably just me, but I do find it interesting! There aren't many product brands I really like and admire, yet don't actually like the majority of what they produce.

BlueIn2Red is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 March 2016, 11:17 PM   #2
Dandoun
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Lebanon
Posts: 110
I agree 100% with you. The standard royal oak is really amazing and so refined - the offshores seem to be fun and fantasies more than actual historical icons. Completely different types IMO.
Dandoun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 March 2016, 11:59 PM   #3
benlee
"TRF" Member
 
benlee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Ben
Location: SIN & JKT
Watch: Rolex, AP, PP
Posts: 9,874
I like both the RO and ROO line and own pieces from both range. They are quite different obviously despite sharig the same heritage, each fulfill a different need for me depending on my mood and occasion.

If you read up AP history, the original Royal Oak was designed by the famous watch designer, the late Mr Gerard Genta while the ROO was a subsequent spin off 20 years later to create an even sportier and more "fun" version of the Royal Oak. Then it has gotten very popular and AP started making up more and more variation of Offshore with various materials and sizes. While there are certainly some of them I don't approve of, some are really great timepieces with striking wrist presence and most importantly, fun to wear.

So if you find the offshore line too ostentious and unpleasant, well, that's your personal opinion. In the end, it's a matter of personal taste. Enjoy your 15400. Btw, nice pic.
benlee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 March 2016, 12:05 AM   #4
BlueIn2Red
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: UK
Posts: 219
Of course yes, sorry I should have said that in the post - I'm talking only about subjective opinions here, I know that many people like the Offshore and there's absolutely nothing wrong with that! It's probably good for my wallet, and marriage, that I feel this way
BlueIn2Red is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 March 2016, 12:08 AM   #5
benlee
"TRF" Member
 
benlee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Ben
Location: SIN & JKT
Watch: Rolex, AP, PP
Posts: 9,874
Quote:
Originally Posted by AndyGarton View Post
Of course yes, sorry I should have said that in the post - I'm talking only about subjective opinions here, I know that many people like the Offshore and there's absolutely nothing wrong with that! It's probably good for my wallet, and marriage, that I feel this way
Don't say too soon. Even within the RO line there are many desirable pieces. Have your tried on the Jumbo irl?
benlee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 March 2016, 12:09 AM   #6
doc.kool
"TRF" Member
 
doc.kool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 610
beautiful 15400. congrats. I hear what your saying about some of the Offshore line though. To each their own.
doc.kool is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 March 2016, 12:11 AM   #7
BlueIn2Red
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: UK
Posts: 219
Quote:
Originally Posted by benlee View Post
Don't say too soon. Even within the RO line there are many desirable pieces. Have your tried on the Jumbo irl?
Luckily not! I deliberately didn't ask while I was in the boutique buying my 15400, for fear of the consequences! If things go well then I can indeed perhaps see a silver dial Jumbo in my future, if it sings when I try it on...
BlueIn2Red is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 March 2016, 12:16 AM   #8
benlee
"TRF" Member
 
benlee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Ben
Location: SIN & JKT
Watch: Rolex, AP, PP
Posts: 9,874
Quote:
Originally Posted by AndyGarton View Post
Luckily not! I deliberately didn't ask while I was in the boutique buying my 15400, for fear of the consequences! If things go well then I can indeed perhaps see a silver dial Jumbo in my future, if it sings when I try it on...
Good for you ( for your wallet I mean ) . Quite a number of WIS friends I know including some of us here ( myself included ) flip their 15400 once they experienced the Jumbo in real life. The Jumbo 15202 is true to the original design of the Royal Oak when it was first released, and IMHO, perfect in every way.

Meantime, you can browse this thread

http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=356146
benlee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 March 2016, 12:52 AM   #9
google
"TRF" Member
 
google's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: NoVA
Watch: AP ROO, Daytona
Posts: 116
I think it's all a matter of perspective, I own one of the ugliest APs according to some and for me I could never buy a 15400 - It looks so plain and boring.
google is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 March 2016, 12:55 AM   #10
BlueIn2Red
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: UK
Posts: 219
Quote:
Originally Posted by google View Post
I think it's all a matter of perspective, I own one of the ugliest APs according to some and for me I could never buy a 15400 - It looks so plain and boring.
Well put, perspective indeed. Life would be so dull if everybody liked the same things!
BlueIn2Red is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 March 2016, 01:08 AM   #11
sssteel
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: US
Posts: 499
Quote:
Originally Posted by google View Post
I think it's all a matter of perspective, I own one of the ugliest APs according to some and for me I could never buy a 15400 - It looks so plain and boring.

Exactly right!!
sssteel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 March 2016, 01:42 AM   #12
Fiery
"TRF" Member
 
Fiery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Europe
Watch: Sub-C 116610LN
Posts: 2,649
I don't think it's strange at all. I myself find only one model per most brands exciting. With AP my one and only favorite is the 15202ST, my favorite IWC is the Ingenieur 3239, my favorite Omega is the Speedmaster (the original Moon Watch), my favorite GO is the Seventies Panorama Date, etc. Rolex and Patek are different though: with them I can find multiple models exciting :)
__________________
"In an age of obsolescence and gimmickry, this simple classic virtue of a Rolex is indeed a rarity." (Rolex ad from 1974)
Fiery is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 March 2016, 01:47 AM   #13
lig
"TRF" Member
 
lig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: PacNW
Watch: Enthusiast
Posts: 2,612
Makes sense to me. I'm perfectly happy with my 15300 as my only AP. Same thing with my PAM 111. There are other APs and Panerais I'd like to have but in all likelihood won't pursue.
lig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 March 2016, 02:04 AM   #14
masterserg
"TRF" Member
 
masterserg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Serg
Location: US of A
Watch: AP
Posts: 7,437
Quote:
Originally Posted by AndyGarton View Post
The Offshore line especially I find ostentatious and often downright unpleasant in terms of design. It seems bizarre to me that the team of people that produce the elegant beauty of the RO can also produce some of those blingy Offshore monstrosities!
Great way to make friends...
__________________
How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer meat????
masterserg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 March 2016, 02:14 AM   #15
sea-dweller
"TRF" Member
 
sea-dweller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
Very nice!
__________________
TRF Member #6699 (since September 2007)
sea-dweller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 March 2016, 02:24 AM   #16
B. Doggy
"TRF" Member
 
B. Doggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Oregon
Posts: 7,399
Nice watch!
__________________
Rolex / Panerai / Omega
B. Doggy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 March 2016, 04:51 AM   #17
Abdullasaif
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Dubai
Watch: bipolar
Posts: 2,854
Quote:
Originally Posted by benlee View Post
Good for you ( for your wallet I mean ) . Quite a number of WIS friends I know including some of us here ( myself included ) flip their 15400 once they experienced the Jumbo in real life. The Jumbo 15202 is true to the original design of the Royal Oak when it was first released, and IMHO, perfect in every way.

Meantime, you can browse this thread

http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=356146
Once you lay your hands on one you cant do anything except buy it, I am a victim of the jumbo
Abdullasaif is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 March 2016, 06:47 AM   #18
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
While the 15202 Jumbo is the seminal AP watch in many ways, in more recent years it has actually cut against the grain of what APs are, at least to me, and that is muscular, dynamic, bold sports prestige watches. For dress/sports watches the 15300 is thicker and the 15400 wears like a 43mm and so continue this tradition along with the ROOs, and thus the elegant, slim 202 is more of an outlier for me and more in accord with a Patek.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 March 2016, 08:19 AM   #19
Islatate
"TRF" Member
 
Islatate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Ken
Location: North of 49th
Watch: 5980/1R-001
Posts: 1,083
I am a big fan of the Offshores, having owned both the SS and RG Rubberclads, and currently the FC Jarno Trulli. IMHO, there is not a more handsome or cooler sport watch than the Trulli. With its subtle gray tapisserie dial, forged carbon case, and minimal use of red accents, it is neither ostentatious nor in-your-face. Again, that's just my own opinion.
Attached Images
 
__________________
PP 5980/1R-001
PP 5146/1R-001
PP 5396/1G-001
AP 25940ok
Rolex 116520
Islatate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 March 2016, 08:19 AM   #20
Manofsteelpt
"TRF" Member
 
Manofsteelpt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Real Name: Mike
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 3,971
Quote:
Originally Posted by masterserg View Post
Great way to make friends...
I decided to bite my tongue (er, sit on my fingers) for this thread...

I mean seriously, just look how ugly this watch is:
Attached Images
 
Manofsteelpt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 March 2016, 08:21 AM   #21
Manofsteelpt
"TRF" Member
 
Manofsteelpt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Real Name: Mike
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 3,971
Ken, your Trulli looks AWESOME on that grey hornback!!!
Manofsteelpt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 March 2016, 08:26 AM   #22
Islatate
"TRF" Member
 
Islatate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Ken
Location: North of 49th
Watch: 5980/1R-001
Posts: 1,083
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manofsteelpt View Post
I decided to bite my tongue (er, sit on my fingers) for this thread...

I mean seriously, just look how ugly this watch is:
That is a killer ROO Mike. If my wrist were larger than 7", I would own a 44mm ROO too.
__________________
PP 5980/1R-001
PP 5146/1R-001
PP 5396/1G-001
AP 25940ok
Rolex 116520
Islatate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 March 2016, 08:35 AM   #23
Islatate
"TRF" Member
 
Islatate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Ken
Location: North of 49th
Watch: 5980/1R-001
Posts: 1,083
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manofsteelpt View Post
Ken, your Trulli looks AWESOME on that grey hornback!!!
Thanks Mike! Here it is again.
Attached Images
 
__________________
PP 5980/1R-001
PP 5146/1R-001
PP 5396/1G-001
AP 25940ok
Rolex 116520
Islatate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 March 2016, 08:36 AM   #24
Manofsteelpt
"TRF" Member
 
Manofsteelpt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Real Name: Mike
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 3,971
Quote:
Originally Posted by Islatate View Post
That is a killer ROO Mike. If my wrist were larger than 7", I would own a 44mm ROO too.
Thanks!
Manofsteelpt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 March 2016, 08:55 AM   #25
masterserg
"TRF" Member
 
masterserg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Serg
Location: US of A
Watch: AP
Posts: 7,437
Quote:
Originally Posted by AndyGarton View Post
I know that many people like the Offshore and there's absolutely nothing wrong with that
Thank you. I feel better now that I know it's OK.
__________________
How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer meat????
masterserg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 March 2016, 08:57 AM   #26
sssteel
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: US
Posts: 499
Quote:
Originally Posted by Islatate View Post
I am a big fan of the Offshores, having owned both the SS and RG Rubberclads, and currently the FC Jarno Trulli. IMHO, there is not a more handsome or cooler sport watch than the Trulli. With its subtle gray tapisserie dial, forged carbon case, and minimal use of red accents, it is neither ostentatious nor in-your-face. Again, that's just my own opinion.

Good to see something different here, and nice watch/shot!
sssteel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 March 2016, 09:53 AM   #27
Manofsteelpt
"TRF" Member
 
Manofsteelpt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Real Name: Mike
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 3,971
Quote:
Originally Posted by masterserg View Post
Thank you. I feel better now that I know it's OK.
Lol, guess now you can pull your FS ad for your hideous FC!
Manofsteelpt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 March 2016, 10:06 AM   #28
jrs146
"TRF" Member
 
jrs146's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Josh
Location: Lost in time
Watch: Me Nae Nae
Posts: 9,823
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dandoun View Post
I agree 100% with you. The standard royal oak is really amazing and so refined - the offshores seem to be fun and fantasies more than actual historical icons. Completely different types IMO.

For the most part I agree.
I own a 15400 and would probably not own both this and a 15202. Although I'd maybe consider trading up for one. I love that ROC, but there are other chronos I'd purchase first. The ROO line is nice... But not quite my cup of tea.

That all being said, it's great you love your 15400! There are so many nice watch brands out there and one can build a great collection with just one or two from any given company.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
__________________
"Sometimes the songs that we hear are just songs of our own."
-Jerome J. Garcia, Robert C. Hunter
jrs146 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 March 2016, 10:47 AM   #29
NoVaSubowner
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Alexandria, VA
Watch: Love them.
Posts: 1,098
Not sure I completely agree. I also own a 15400 which easily gets 75% of my wrist time. I think the design of the Royal Oak Automatic is iconic and about as classic as it gets.

While I am not crazy about the ROO line, I also think it has become as iconic in it's own right as the 15202/15300/15400 series.

Pretty hard pressed to find a large bold sports watch with heritage and build quality like AP's I really don't think one exists. So while I don't care for the ROO line, I can appreciate it for what it is and recognize that there have been many buyers that do like and love this series so that must count for something.
NoVaSubowner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 March 2016, 10:51 AM   #30
NoVaSubowner
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Alexandria, VA
Watch: Love them.
Posts: 1,098
Quote:
Originally Posted by AK797 View Post
While the 15202 Jumbo is the seminal AP watch in many ways, in more recent years it has actually cut against the grain of what APs are, at least to me, and that is muscular, dynamic, bold sports prestige watches. For dress/sports watches the 15300 is thicker and the 15400 wears like a 43mm and so continue this tradition along with the ROOs, and thus the elegant, slim 202 is more of an outlier for me and more in accord with a Patek.
I disagree that the RO wears like a 43mm.... On me at least it feels like 40 or 41.
NoVaSubowner is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

WatchShell

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2025, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.