ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
21 April 2016, 06:47 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Real Name: John
Location: Mechanicsburg, PA
Watch: Submariner 16610LV
Posts: 10
|
1603 Question
I bought a 1978 1603 Datejust. I know the bracelet and clasp are not original to the watch, but I'm wondering if the bracelet is authentic. Can any of you experts chime in?
|
21 April 2016, 06:54 AM | #2 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: USA
Watch: 5712
Posts: 2,614
|
Can't comment on its authenticity but that is an amazing amount of stretch on that jubilee!
|
21 April 2016, 07:00 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Real Name: John
Location: Mechanicsburg, PA
Watch: Submariner 16610LV
Posts: 10
|
I think stretch looks cool. It's not too bad.
|
21 April 2016, 07:21 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Jay
Location: TEXAS
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 7,648
|
Nice vintage watch.
You may want to repost in vintage. The bracelet for what it is, is in good shape IMO. |
21 April 2016, 08:14 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Real Name: John
Location: Mechanicsburg, PA
Watch: Submariner 16610LV
Posts: 10
|
Thank you, landroverking. I have a Range Rover, ironically. LOL. Does the dial look original to you guys, or does it look refinished?
|
21 April 2016, 08:20 AM | #6 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: PRJ
Posts: 1,732
|
I'm pretty good with 16XX series, honestly can't tell if dial is repaint from the photo and mean no disrespect.
__________________
"Do you like Breitling?" "I don't know, really, I've never been Breitled" |
21 April 2016, 08:24 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Real Name: John
Location: Mechanicsburg, PA
Watch: Submariner 16610LV
Posts: 10
|
The bracelet is not original for a 1978 1603, is it?
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.