ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
1 August 2008, 12:24 AM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 38
|
What's Wrong With Cellini?
I don't hear the best things about the Cellini Line(mostly from you guys/girls and I just want to know what the problem with them is. Truth is, I just paid $2200 for a Solid 14kt one - bracelet is the 14kt mesh bracelet and I think it's a perfect, simple but elegant dress watch.
Just want to know why I don't hear anything good about them from you folks. Thanks, Russ |
1 August 2008, 12:33 AM | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 5513MaxiI+PreComex
Posts: 18,421
|
Nothing wrong with Cellini I think. Nice Rolex too.
But some of 'em is used quartz movement. that's the problem. |
1 August 2008, 12:35 AM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 38
|
This one is a manual wind - not auto and no date... I'll post pics later...
|
1 August 2008, 12:37 AM | #4 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Matt
Location: Arlington, VA
Watch: Lange One MP
Posts: 4,043
|
My personal thoughts:
I don't think dress watches are a Rolex core-competency. I don't like the way the Cellini line looks either so I don't have much good to say about them. While Cellini dials have "Rolex" on them, the connection between the two is pretty weak to the average person, so the status buyer usually opts for other models or brands. Sounds like you have a watch you like though at a very reasonable price. I think a pure dress watch is something everyone that loves watches should own. |
1 August 2008, 12:44 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: North America
Watch: their hands, baby.
Posts: 1,116
|
I just prefer the Oyster design and durability.
I like a Rolex on my wrist that's part gentlemen, part tough-guy, with the pedigree of an explorer and adventurer. Chris |
1 August 2008, 12:47 AM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 38
|
Me too. My tt Sub is my daily driver, but I thought the Cellini was a pretty good deal, so I got it...
|
1 August 2008, 12:55 AM | #7 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 5513MaxiI+PreComex
Posts: 18,421
|
|
1 August 2008, 12:56 AM | #8 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Ty
Location: Irving, TX
Watch: Exp II 42mm
Posts: 919
|
Quote:
__________________
Rolex Explorer II 42mm • Panerai 389 47mm |
|
1 August 2008, 01:02 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: North America
Watch: their hands, baby.
Posts: 1,116
|
|
1 August 2008, 01:07 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Chris
Location: Camden ME & STT
Watch: 116600
Posts: 6,350
|
Poor misunderstood Cellini, he tries hard, he's treated like the red-headed stepchild of Rolex. I have a nice solid 18k vintage Cellini which is elegant. I'd say most people don't know the differences because they've never actually seen a Rolex to begin with. But to the informed, it's true, Cellini gets a bad rap.
Thanks for coming out of the closet! We'll be accepted someday!
__________________
Rolex 116600 Sea-dweller Montblanc Solitaire Doué Black & White Legrand FP Montblanc Solitaire Doué Black & White RB Montblanc Meisterstück Diamond Mozart BP Montblanc Meisterstück Mozart BP |
1 August 2008, 01:19 AM | #11 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Al
Location: Way Up North
Watch: your P's & Q's
Posts: 10,473
|
Nancy says she likes hers.
__________________
Member #1,315 I don't want to get technical, but according to chemistry alcohol IS a solution! |
1 August 2008, 01:20 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: David
Location: London+Guangzhou
Watch: ing watches
Posts: 2,603
|
I think the Cellini is a beautiful watch.
Most of us that are buying a Rolex watch want the Rolex look and I guess the problem with some people is that the Cellini does not look like a Rolex. So what ! It is a Rolex and a very nice one at that - what does it matter whether or not people know its a Rolex. You know what it is and as long as you enjoy it, wear it. |
1 August 2008, 01:21 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 9,407
|
Nancy has great taste Al...and I aint talking about her choosing you buddy!!!!!!
J |
1 August 2008, 01:28 AM | #14 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,490
|
Nothing wrong with Cellini..
Rolex has the three great products, Rolex, Tudor, and Cellini.. The quality in all of them is first class, but the Rolex gets it's fame from the waterproof Oyster marketing and larger currently in-style looks. Tudor also follows it's big-brother lead. I wish they imported to the US. Cellini is a more budget minded option with a dressy slim look and their manual wind and Quartz offerings. Get one with a diamond band and bezel and you have a 20k piece easy.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
1 August 2008, 01:40 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Martin
Location: UK
Posts: 7,023
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.