ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

BillA · 2 June 2016, 03:50 AM

Does anyone have a side by side picture of the Sub vs. the Ceramic Sub in SS?
thank you.

Jwin · 2 June 2016, 05:24 AM

Found this on another Sub v SubC thread

Jwin · 2 June 2016, 06:07 AM

Found this on one of the many 16610 v 116610 threads.

BillA · 2 June 2016, 12:37 PM

thank you

thomaspp · 2 June 2016, 12:39 PM

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Seaswirl · 2 June 2016, 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thomaspp

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Now that's a Sub! Gorgeous.

LostInTime · 3 June 2016, 03:16 PM

It's hard to beat the classic shape of that 16610 - what a great looking watch.

busytimmy · 3 June 2016, 03:45 PM

A quick look at images.google of 'Sub vs SubC' sure returns a lot helpful results as well

joli160 · 3 June 2016, 06:02 PM

On the wrist the thicker lugs of the 116610 do not appear that obvious as on the comparison pics imho. Prefer the ceramic

flathead59 · 3 June 2016, 06:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joli160

On the wrist the thicker lugs of the 116610 do not appear that obvious as on the comparison pics imho. Prefer the ceramic

I agree. I said I'd never buy a six digit because of the lugs, then I tried one on. I like it, and have since bought one.

Mark

LostInTime · 4 June 2016, 12:22 AM

I'm going to have to disagree regarding the lugs in person. When I tried on the Submariner, it was immidiatley noticeable. Trying on the Sea Dweller ceramic side-by-side really drove home the fact that those Sub lugs altered the look of the watch.

cataby · 4 June 2016, 01:14 AM

People are going to go back and forth on the lug thing. For me, it kills the watch. Prefer the old style by far. My wife, she like the looks of the new one.

2 June 2016, 03:50 AM	#1
BillA 2025 Pledge Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: US Posts: 3,953	Sub vs. Ceramic Sub picture Does anyone have a side by side picture of the Sub vs. the Ceramic Sub in SS? thank you.

2 June 2016, 12:39 PM	#5
thomaspp "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: N/A Posts: 11,137	Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ Instagram: @watches_anonymous

3 June 2016, 06:02 PM	#9
joli160 2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2013 Location: NL Watch: Yachtmaster Posts: 14,959	On the wrist the thicker lugs of the 116610 do not appear that obvious as on the comparison pics imho. Prefer the ceramic __________________ Day Date 18238, Yachtmaster 16622, Deepsea 116660, Submariner 116619, SkyD 326935, DJ 178271, DJ 69158, Yachtmaster 169622, GMT 116713LN, GMT 126711.

2 June 2016, 05:24 AM	#2
Jwin "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2016 Location: SEPA, USA Watch: 116710LN Posts: 62	Found this on another Sub v SubC thread

2 June 2016, 06:07 AM	#3
Jwin "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2016 Location: SEPA, USA Watch: 116710LN Posts: 62	Found this on one of the many 16610 v 116610 threads.

2 June 2016, 12:37 PM	#4
BillA 2025 Pledge Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: US Posts: 3,953	thank you

3 June 2016, 03:16 PM	#7
LostInTime "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Is Everything Posts: 205	It's hard to beat the classic shape of that 16610 - what a great looking watch.

3 June 2016, 03:45 PM	#8
busytimmy "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2012 Location: Sydney, Australia Watch: ing the detectives Posts: 3,745	A quick look at images.google of 'Sub vs SubC' sure returns a lot helpful results as well

4 June 2016, 12:22 AM	#11
LostInTime "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Is Everything Posts: 205	I'm going to have to disagree regarding the lugs in person. When I tried on the Submariner, it was immidiatley noticeable. Trying on the Sea Dweller ceramic side-by-side really drove home the fact that those Sub lugs altered the look of the watch.

4 June 2016, 01:14 AM	#12
cataby "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2015 Location: midwest Watch: sea dweller Posts: 120	People are going to go back and forth on the lug thing. For me, it kills the watch. Prefer the old style by far. My wife, she like the looks of the new one.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)