ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

joejoe1225 · 6 August 2016, 12:12 PM

It's perfect!!!

aperna · 6 August 2016, 12:13 PM

Totally agree

Justinmg · 6 August 2016, 01:07 PM

Love it, can't beat the 5 digit Rolex

G'ed · 6 August 2016, 01:17 PM

No love for the 6 digits? ;(

strafer_kid · 6 August 2016, 10:08 PM

The SD16600 is a great all rounder.........excellent design and engineering........stylish yet simple and still 'tool like'. Service every few years and it will go for ever!

joejoe1225 · 6 August 2016, 10:39 PM

Here you go. My other one.

fskywalker · 6 August 2016, 11:10 PM

Those are really sweet!

JP Chestnut · 6 August 2016, 11:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Justinmg

Love it, can't beat the 5 digit Rolex

Agree. Vintage is so cool, but five digit is where it's at for me. Cool and practical.

WAK4 · 6 August 2016, 11:37 PM

One of the best all time

Justinmg · 6 August 2016, 11:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JP Chestnut

Agree. Vintage is so cool, but five digit is where it's at for me. Cool and practical.

Agree, I just sold my 116600 and have a mint 16600 on the way. The five digit just feel more Rolex to me, it's what I grew up seeing. The six digits feel like they don't have that spirt or soul that the five digits have. Just the accessories that came with the 16600 paint a picture of what these watches were originally designed for.

joejoe1225 · 6 August 2016, 11:58 PM

I think you can definitely have the old and new in a collection. They are perfect together.

nintendo · 7 August 2016, 12:01 AM

Agreed. 16600 has more soul. Sold this piece and missing it since.

JP Chestnut · 7 August 2016, 12:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joejoe1225

I think you can definitely have the old and new in a collection. They are perfect together.

For sure. My favorite watch is an f-serial Daytona. It has the solid bracelet and nicer clasp of the new watches combined with the slimmer case and hands of the 5 digit references. It's the perfect hybrid. The new sd4k is another compelling 6 digit ref.

Every time I get a new watch, I'm tempted to get a modern reference, but the call of the 5 digits (even as overpriced as they are) is too strong to resist.

douglasf13 · 7 August 2016, 12:13 AM

Aside from all of the more obvious differences, a great thing about the 16660, compared to the SD4K, is the smaller dial, which places the date window nearer to the edge. The date window is inset too far on the SD4K and looks out of proportion.

improviz · 7 August 2016, 12:20 AM

Danny83 · 7 August 2016, 12:51 AM

Nice

sea-dweller · 7 August 2016, 01:27 AM

Looks great!

6 August 2016, 12:12 PM	#1
joejoe1225 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2013 Real Name: Joe Location: USA Watch: ROLEX Posts: 1,928	Why we love the SD 16600 It's perfect!!! __________________

6 August 2016, 10:39 PM	#6
joejoe1225 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2013 Real Name: Joe Location: USA Watch: ROLEX Posts: 1,928	Here you go. My other one. __________________

6 August 2016, 11:10 PM	#7
fskywalker 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2014 Real Name: Francisco Location: San Juan, PR Watch: Is Ticking ! Posts: 25,154	Those are really sweet! __________________ Francisco ♛ 16610 / 116264 Ω 168.022 / 2535.80.00 / 310.30.42.50.01.002 / 210.90.42.20.01.001 Zenith 02.480.405 2FA security enabled

6 August 2016, 11:58 PM	#11
joejoe1225 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2013 Real Name: Joe Location: USA Watch: ROLEX Posts: 1,928	I think you can definitely have the old and new in a collection. They are perfect together. __________________

7 August 2016, 12:20 AM	#15
improviz "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Tejas Watch: your step Posts: 2,806	__________________ 116520 white; 16613 black; 116710; 16570 polar; 16600. AP 15400; 15703. Blancpain Fifty Fathoms. Glashutte Sport Evo GMT. Omega Planet Ocean 2907.50.91; Planet Ocean Liquidmetal LE 222.30.42.20.01.001; Seamaster 2255.80.00. Breitling Crosswind, white. Panerai PAM 005. VC Overseas Chrono, black.

6 August 2016, 12:13 PM	#2
aperna "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2013 Location: USA Watch: all of them Posts: 661	Totally agree

6 August 2016, 01:07 PM	#3
Justinmg "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2015 Real Name: Justin Location: FL Watch: PO/EXPL Posts: 3,371	Love it, can't beat the 5 digit Rolex

6 August 2016, 01:17 PM	#4
G'ed "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2015 Location: RolexHQ boardroom Posts: 1,232	No love for the 6 digits? ;(

6 August 2016, 10:08 PM	#5
strafer_kid "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Real Name: Kenny Location: northern ireland Watch: SDs, Subs & GMTs Posts: 5,136	The SD16600 is a great all rounder.........excellent design and engineering........stylish yet simple and still 'tool like'. Service every few years and it will go for ever!

7 August 2016, 12:01 AM	#12
nintendo "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2014 Location: Singapore Posts: 333	Agreed. 16600 has more soul. Sold this piece and missing it since.

7 August 2016, 12:13 AM	#14
douglasf13 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: USA Posts: 5,622	Aside from all of the more obvious differences, a great thing about the 16660, compared to the SD4K, is the smaller dial, which places the date window nearer to the edge. The date window is inset too far on the SD4K and looks out of proportion.

7 August 2016, 12:51 AM	#16
Danny83 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2013 Real Name: Danny Location: Bay Area CA Watch: Yellow Gold Posts: 20,301	Nice

7 August 2016, 01:27 AM	#17
sea-dweller "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Real Name: Dennis Location: Bay Area - 925 Posts: 40,018	Looks great! __________________ TRF Member #6699 (since September 2007)

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)