ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

jmed · 7 August 2016, 12:06 PM

I believe I have decided on the next watch, a TT Blue Sub. What I can't decide on is the older 16613 or the newer 116613. I will purchasing pre-loved and definitely want the Sunburst dial. I am well aware of the differences in the 2 as I already have a 16610LV and a 116710, I like both case proportions. My biggest question is, did the 16613 ever come with solid bracelet links, and what was the last serials that were produced in the 16613, the latest I can find are "m" serials, were there any "g" or random serials in the 16613 lineup? Thank you in advance for any help or advice you can give.

John

roaddog359 · 7 August 2016, 12:09 PM

I dont think the older watch model ever had solid links only the new one.

Onikage · 7 August 2016, 12:30 PM

Only the full gold one had solid CLs.

fskywalker · 7 August 2016, 10:33 PM

I think on the 16613 bracelet you would only see solid links on the end links if the one you buy is from its latest version before the swich to ceramic.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

tomallen · 7 August 2016, 10:53 PM

I recommend the newer 116613LB with the sunburst dial. You can usually get a fair discount at an AD on the TT Sub. You can find an unworn late 16613LB with the gold through clasp, solid dive extension, and solid end links but you will probably pay close to the new 116613LB. New you will have a five year Warranty.

Byrdguy · 8 August 2016, 01:53 AM

The later 16613 had solid end links, no holes (pin) through the case and gold through the clasp. 2005 and up, I think. Gorgeous watches. Also gold marker surrounds and gold hands, which the 116613 does not have.

kirksingleton · 8 August 2016, 02:16 AM

I like the newer bracelet myself.

jmed · 8 August 2016, 05:23 AM

All good responses/reasons guys, I agree I definitely like the newer style bracelet, I just have to ponder is it worth the price difference.

LuminousMaximus · 8 August 2016, 05:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Byrdguy

The later 16613 had solid end links, no holes (pin) through the case and gold through the clasp. 2005 and up, I think. Gorgeous watches. Also gold marker surrounds and gold hands, which the 116613 does not have.

I thought all Rolex had gold markers...?

tomallen · 8 August 2016, 06:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LuminousMaximus

I thought all Rolex had gold markers...?

Mine sure does, I have both the matte dial and the sunburst dial they both have gold surrounds, minute markers, and hands. The only difference I see is the color of the date wheel.

roaddog359 · 8 August 2016, 06:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jmed

All good responses/reasons guys, I agree I definitely like the newer style bracelet, I just have to ponder is it worth the price difference.

I think its worth the difference. I got the newer one and can not be happier with it.

Mrkamir9 · 8 August 2016, 07:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tomallen

I recommend the newer 116613LB with the sunburst dial. You can usually get a fair discount at an AD on the TT Sub. You can find an unworn late 16613LB with the gold through clasp, solid dive extension, and solid end links but you will probably pay close to the new 116613LB. New you will have a five year Warranty.

I agree!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

joli160 · 8 August 2016, 12:13 PM

The new one

7 August 2016, 12:06 PM	#1
jmed "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: U.S. Posts: 249	Help wth Rolex 16613 Blue I believe I have decided on the next watch, a TT Blue Sub. What I can't decide on is the older 16613 or the newer 116613. I will purchasing pre-loved and definitely want the Sunburst dial. I am well aware of the differences in the 2 as I already have a 16610LV and a 116710, I like both case proportions. My biggest question is, did the 16613 ever come with solid bracelet links, and what was the last serials that were produced in the 16613, the latest I can find are "m" serials, were there any "g" or random serials in the 16613 lineup? Thank you in advance for any help or advice you can give. John

7 August 2016, 12:30 PM	#3
Onikage "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: England Watch: 16710, 16628 Posts: 7,757	Only the full gold one had solid CLs. __________________ GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL ( D- Serial #) ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4

7 August 2016, 10:33 PM	#4
fskywalker 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2014 Real Name: Francisco Location: San Juan, PR Watch: Is Ticking ! Posts: 25,160	I think on the 16613 bracelet you would only see solid links on the end links if the one you buy is from its latest version before the swich to ceramic. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ Francisco ♛ 16610 / 116264 Ω 168.022 / 2535.80.00 / 310.30.42.50.01.002 / 210.90.42.20.01.001 Zenith 02.480.405 2FA security enabled

7 August 2016, 10:53 PM	#5
tomallen 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Real Name: Tom Location: Connecticut Watch: Rolex SubC,GMTIIC Posts: 966	I recommend the newer 116613LB with the sunburst dial. You can usually get a fair discount at an AD on the TT Sub. You can find an unworn late 16613LB with the gold through clasp, solid dive extension, and solid end links but you will probably pay close to the new 116613LB. New you will have a five year Warranty. __________________ Unless you are the lead dog the scenery never changes

8 August 2016, 12:13 PM	#13
joli160 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2013 Location: NL Watch: Yachtmaster Posts: 14,738	The new one __________________ Day Date 18238, Yachtmaster 16622, Deepsea 116660, Submariner 116619, SkyD 326935, DJ 178271, DJ 69158, Yachtmaster 169622, GMT 116713LN, GMT 126711.

7 August 2016, 12:09 PM	#2
roaddog359 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2016 Location: earth Watch: Bluesy Posts: 865	I dont think the older watch model ever had solid links only the new one.

8 August 2016, 01:53 AM	#6
Byrdguy "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: Florida Panhandle Watch: Sub C LV, Posts: 490	The later 16613 had solid end links, no holes (pin) through the case and gold through the clasp. 2005 and up, I think. Gorgeous watches. Also gold marker surrounds and gold hands, which the 116613 does not have.

8 August 2016, 02:16 AM	#7
kirksingleton "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2015 Location: Seattle, WA Posts: 1,759	I like the newer bracelet myself.

8 August 2016, 05:23 AM	#8
jmed "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: U.S. Posts: 249	All good responses/reasons guys, I agree I definitely like the newer style bracelet, I just have to ponder is it worth the price difference.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)