The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Vintage Rolex Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 22 September 2016, 01:09 PM   #1
Gina Marie
"TRF" Member
 
Gina Marie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: USA Baby!
Posts: 1,068
What is the best value in Vintage Rolex/Tudor?

Big block? 16800 matt? 16550? Spider dials? 16660 glossy?

Let's be honest....the mid 80s glossy dials are now priced like the mid 70s matt dials from 3 years ago. Where is the most upside?
Gina Marie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 September 2016, 01:23 PM   #2
greekbum
"TRF" Member
 
greekbum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Nikos
Location: Florida
Watch: Rolex GMT 16750
Posts: 8,418
IMHO this is not the stock market and you should not buy thinking were is the upside. Buy what you like and its priceless.
__________________
Follow Me On Instagram @nickgogas

Original Owner ROLEX 16750 GMT Daily Wearer For Over 13,000 Days And Counting
greekbum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 September 2016, 01:39 PM   #3
Gina Marie
"TRF" Member
 
Gina Marie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: USA Baby!
Posts: 1,068
Agreed.....but that does not answer my question.....this is a business....look at all the dealers around....they are, for the most part, doing pretty well. Where do you see the biggest upside? Which watches are going to be priced out of contention like a 1655 or floating zenith. Which watches should I look to add that don't require selling a car or a gaggle of stock to purchase?
Gina Marie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 September 2016, 01:58 PM   #4
springer
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
springer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,307
Curious, as to why you keep promoting the defective, cracked spider dials? While you and a few others might like them, they are not a collector item in my opinion. As long as I've been around these vintage watches, I've never had anyone ask me for a spider dial.

As far as other mid-1980s glossy dials, I haven't noticed anything substantial regarding them in the collector market.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990.

INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP
Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics.
springer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 September 2016, 02:03 PM   #5
springer
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
springer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,307
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gina Marie View Post
Agreed.....but that does not answer my question.....this is a business....look at all the dealers around....they are, for the most part, doing pretty well. Where do you see the biggest upside? Which watches are going to be priced out of contention like a 1655 or floating zenith. Which watches should I look to add that don't require selling a car or a gaggle of stock to purchase?
Dealers buy below retail and make a profit at retail, just like in any other business. No secret here regarding potential future profits. Most dealers do not buy and hold, they are making a living and need to keep turning over inventory.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990.

INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP
Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics.
springer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 September 2016, 02:12 PM   #6
greekbum
"TRF" Member
 
greekbum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Nikos
Location: Florida
Watch: Rolex GMT 16750
Posts: 8,418
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gina Marie View Post
Agreed.....but that does not answer my question.....this is a business....look at all the dealers around....they are, for the most part, doing pretty well. Where do you see the biggest upside? Which watches are going to be priced out of contention like a 1655 or floating zenith. Which watches should I look to add that don't require selling a car or a gaggle of stock to purchase?
Gina in the mid 80s I bought my 1st Rolex GMT and shortly thereafter started buying almost all i found. I was a collector then I turned into a dealer selling some off buying some etc. IMHO I never saw watches as an investment. I was in the investment business for almost 20 years. I always tell people buy what you like and will wear with money you don't care about. Its a watch. If I were to speculate id say this. Buy the best example of a desirable reference for the best price.
__________________
Follow Me On Instagram @nickgogas

Original Owner ROLEX 16750 GMT Daily Wearer For Over 13,000 Days And Counting
greekbum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 September 2016, 04:21 PM   #7
alwayshere
"TRF" Member
 
alwayshere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,559
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gina Marie View Post
Agreed.....but that does not answer my question.....this is a business....look at all the dealers around....they are, for the most part, doing pretty well. Where do you see the biggest upside? Which watches are going to be priced out of contention like a 1655 or floating zenith. Which watches should I look to add that don't require selling a car or a gaggle of stock to purchase?
Another way to answer your question is no one really knows - do you think when they first release the Milgauss in the 50's, it would have been an investment watch?

Like the others have said, buy when you like - on the flip side, if we did know which ones were good investments, we wouldn't share that information with you either

One last thing, I have noticed you buy quite a few vintage tudor submariners - I myself think these are great investments! (thats just my view anyway)
alwayshere is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 September 2016, 04:47 PM   #8
Gina Marie
"TRF" Member
 
Gina Marie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: USA Baby!
Posts: 1,068
I like the spider dials....they speak to me. I enjoy the flaw. Recall that 10 years ago folks were not that fond of brown subs....now look at them.

Regarding tudors......if i want a nice matt 5513....i will need to pay upwards of 9k....a nice blue 94010 or 7016 is in the 6's. When i go onto a site i see 5x the number of 5513s as i do blue tudor snowflakes.....hmmmm....seems to me the blue snowflake is lower thsn it should be as compared to the 5513.....both iconic....both classic.....both unique.
Gina Marie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 September 2016, 06:23 PM   #9
jvmartin
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,349
Try and stay out of anything too recent but also too vintage or rare. You will want to buy something that you can expect will always have consistent demand from a large customer base... I personally like 70s-90s Datejusts, hence the watches I post in the For Sale section...
jvmartin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 September 2016, 06:27 PM   #10
brandrea
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 77,743
Quote:
Originally Posted by greekbum View Post
Gina in the mid 80s I bought my 1st Rolex GMT and shortly thereafter started buying almost all i found. I was a collector then I turned into a dealer selling some off buying some etc. IMHO I never saw watches as an investment. I was in the investment business for almost 20 years. I always tell people buy what you like and will wear with money you don't care about. Its a watch. If I were to speculate id say this. Buy the best example of a desirable reference for the best price.
Great advice Nick, and that's what I did thanks to you
Attached Images
File Type: jpg image.jpg (53.8 KB, 491 views)
brandrea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 September 2016, 04:27 AM   #11
rootbeer7
2024 Pledge Member
 
rootbeer7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: london
Posts: 6,140
these!!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_20150430_203614_edit_edit.jpg (128.3 KB, 427 views)
rootbeer7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 September 2016, 08:04 AM   #12
onthedial
"TRF" Member
 
onthedial's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: IG @onthedial
Posts: 587
@Gina Marie
Nothing wrong with speculating on which References will see big upsides in the future, but it's a risky proposition to commit a substantial amount of $$$ to one's theory. If you're genuinely interested, I'd recommend taking no more than 5-7% of your invest-able portfolio and purchase what you believe will be increasingly sought after in the near future. Consider holding (and wearing/enjoying) those timepieces for a minimum of two years, study the market, and see where you're at (sell/hold). A word of caution: Like securities investing, I would recommend that you do your own research/due diligence rather than listen to other's opinions/tips. [Psst, matte 16800s are definitely the FUTURE!!!].
_________
Instagram: @onthedial
onthedial is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 September 2016, 08:30 AM   #13
springer
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
springer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,307
Quote:
Originally Posted by onthedial View Post
@Gina Marie
Nothing wrong with speculating on which References will see big upsides in the future, but it's a risky proposition to commit a substantial amount of $$$ to one's theory. If you're genuinely interested, I'd recommend taking no more than 5-7% of your invest-able portfolio and purchase what you believe will be increasingly sought after in the near future. Consider holding (and wearing/enjoying) those timepieces for a minimum of two years, study the market, and see where you're at (sell/hold). A word of caution: Like securities investing, I would recommend that you do your own research/due diligence rather than listen to other's opinions/tips. [Psst, matte 16800s are definitely the FUTURE!!!].
_________
Instagram: @onthedial
Psst...don't tell anyone, but I'm buying GMT 16710 sets as well as 16700 GMT sets. Six years ago, they were available for around $3200 - $3500 . . . fast forward to Sept 2016, you'll pay around $6500 plus for a nice set.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990.

INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP
Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics.
springer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 September 2016, 11:48 AM   #14
harry in montreal
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Montreal
Watch: The Habs pick 1st!
Posts: 3,589
Beginning in 2000 I was buying snowflake subs. I would find them for $800 on poor bands. 2005; I would occasionally buy broken snowflakes for 800-1000. Fix, wear and sell. 2 years ago, I bought a few at about 1800 and put them away. I just lived how they looked. This is the best advice that greekbum noted above. BUY WHAT YOU LOVE. Never buy a painting because it matches the couch.
harry in montreal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 September 2016, 11:48 AM   #15
onthedial
"TRF" Member
 
onthedial's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: IG @onthedial
Posts: 587
@springer
John, I'll see your 16710 & 16700 sets and raise you with Speedmaster pre-1971 Ref 145.022 and 145.012.
___________
Instagram: @onthedial
onthedial is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 September 2016, 03:36 PM   #16
Fleetlord
2024 Pledge Member
 
Fleetlord's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Vain
Posts: 6,006
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gina Marie View Post
Big block? 16800 matt? 16550? Spider dials? 16660 glossy?

Let's be honest....the mid 80s glossy dials are now priced like the mid 70s matt dials from 3 years ago. Where is the most upside?
Too late.

"Vintage" Rolex and Tudor are pretty much all overvalued.

Tudor Sub 79090 are the exception if you can buy nice one under $3k.

It's like rare coins at this point. The money has found the nice stuff and floated it up and away into oncoming stagnation and future deflation as interests shift. Collectors are fickle beasts.

Watches are even worse as the vintage and hipster trend that has been driving prices fades and something else becomes super duper cool.
Fleetlord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 September 2016, 08:12 PM   #17
eco8gator
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Florida
Watch: 5060/a
Posts: 1,119
Blue Tudor 79090 and 79190 are good buys under 3k. Much smarter choice than a Black Bay. Easily serviceable, classic look, unique color for a steel sub. I think this will be the next to creep up in price.

Any Snowflake since the hands are unique and cool. I'd stick with black for now since blue ones are at a crazy premium. They look amazing on a NATO. I think these will stay level for some time.
eco8gator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 September 2016, 08:42 PM   #18
Vincent65
"TRF" Member
 
Vincent65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 14,298
It's pretty subjective - you could argue a "Paul Newman" Daytona is the best bet, if you've got the funds to spare!
__________________
https://www.rolexforums.com/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=80782&dateline=139659  8629
Vincent65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 September 2016, 11:11 PM   #19
brockburst
2024 Pledge Member
 
brockburst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Chicago
Posts: 792
Sent you a PM with my thoughts
brockburst is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 September 2016, 11:59 PM   #20
harry in montreal
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Montreal
Watch: The Habs pick 1st!
Posts: 3,589
Blue 79090s seem to never sell below $4k. I think the 76100s are cheaper and have nicer dials.
harry in montreal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 September 2016, 01:05 AM   #21
Gina Marie
"TRF" Member
 
Gina Marie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: USA Baby!
Posts: 1,068
Great PM!!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by brockburst View Post
Sent you a PM with my thoughts
Gina Marie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 September 2016, 01:13 AM   #22
datejust24
"TRF" Member
 
datejust24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Chris
Location: Cincinnati,Ohio
Watch: Rolexssss
Posts: 3,504
have to agree with John here....never looked at spider dials as a desireable characteristic at all...I do think that Big Blocks are gorgeous pieces that are still gaining and can still be found for good deals if you're patient..
datejust24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 September 2016, 01:19 AM   #23
Michael M.
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 8,391
Quote:
Originally Posted by springer View Post
Psst...don't tell anyone, but I'm buying GMT 16710 sets as well as 16700 GMT sets. Six years ago, they were available for around $3200 - $3500 . . . fast forward to Sept 2016, you'll pay around $6500 plus for a nice set.
This is some sound advice. I recently sold a LNOS 16700 and 16710 and was surprised at how quickly they sold. Maybe I priced them too low?

The 16800 matte is one of my favorites. I think in general the transitional sport models have a strong likelihood of appreciating (16800 matte, 16660 matte). I just purchased two mint condition full sets for my personal collection, one of which is nearly unworn. They represent a great balance between vintage soul (matte dial) and modern reliability (sapphire crystal).

Just my 2 cents. I'm no financial wizard nor do I have a crystal ball. My advice has always been, buy what YOU like to wear - and if it appreciates, that's just 'icing on the cake'.
Michael M. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 September 2016, 03:50 AM   #24
norinori
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: nyc
Posts: 6
With the crazy prices of snowflakes and 7928's, personally I think the 7016 small rose transitional, with its unique semi-pcg case, is undervalued given it was only made for 1-2 years. Far fewer available when compared to the number of available snowflakes/7928s.

Though who knows if prices of snowflakes and 7928s will stay up...
norinori is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 September 2016, 01:30 PM   #25
greekbum
"TRF" Member
 
greekbum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Nikos
Location: Florida
Watch: Rolex GMT 16750
Posts: 8,418
Tudor....investment....imho for me only as a much cheaper alternative to the Rolex version. It was always known as the poor mans Rolex as far back as i can remember. If I could choose over the Rolex equivalent I would always go Rolex for myself. The only appeal i ever have with them is if they are 1/2 price or less than the Rolex equivalent. Parts are very hard to source and they have always been a headache for me. This is just my opinion and I know there are collectors and people who love them but the prices of these has gone way high for what they are imho. I've owned 100s and i like the older subs the best.
__________________
Follow Me On Instagram @nickgogas

Original Owner ROLEX 16750 GMT Daily Wearer For Over 13,000 Days And Counting
greekbum is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Asset Appeal


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.