ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

sunnycarp · 13 October 2016, 02:02 AM

Patek Nautilus (SS) VS Aquanaut (either rubber or SS), which would you pick and why?

I used to think the Nautilus SS was nice, but recently I grew to like the look of the rubber Aquanaut. If I had to choose one, I can't make up my mind though.

Thoughts?

beachbum · 13 October 2016, 02:48 AM

Can't go wrong here! I've come to find when I am trying to decide between 2 pieces I end up with both one way or another

in this case the 5167 had to go and the hunt is on for a 5711a. Good Luck!

Flex368 · 13 October 2016, 02:50 AM

I think there´s only one right answer.

arejay · 13 October 2016, 03:10 AM

I ended up getting the 5164 because the wait list for the 5167 was 3-4 years in Japan and the 7211 nautilus is 5 years. Availability affected my purchasing decision. Don't think I'm disappointed though.

I did end up buying a 5167 SS bracelet to try on my 5164. Sadly, no wrist shot because it's being re polished and repaired for the last month (and maybe longer.)

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

locutus49 · 13 October 2016, 03:18 AM

I prefer metal bracelets so I like the 5711.

liu_watch · 13 October 2016, 03:28 AM

If you ask for general opinion, the answer is clear - Nautilus is a more popular line. But all comes down to your preference.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

beshannon · 13 October 2016, 03:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by locutus49

I prefer metal bracelets so I like the 5711.

Exactly why I chose a 5711

AK797 · 13 October 2016, 03:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beshannon

Exactly why I chose a 5711

Yes for a first sports PP I'd go with the bracelet.

JapRs · 13 October 2016, 04:22 AM

Both

But in my case I have gone for the 5164a first...just like it a bit more

Passionata · 13 October 2016, 04:24 AM

Nautilus

iPhone/Tapatalk

lovej · 13 October 2016, 04:40 AM

Sometimes I prefer the subtle delicacy of the nautilus bracelet and other days the arguably more interesting aquanaut dial.

Sent from my SM-N920I using Tapatalk

Ynp · 13 October 2016, 06:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flex368

I think there´s only one right answer.

+1

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

MattCH · 13 October 2016, 06:41 AM

Nautilus. Then aquanaut. But if you have to decide just on one piece. Go for the 5711. Is a fantastic dress watch, and the bracelet is a beauty.

jon_jon · 13 October 2016, 06:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sunnycarp

Patek Nautilus (SS) VS Aquanaut (either rubber or SS), which would you pick and why?

I used to think the Nautilus SS was nice, but recently I grew to like the look of the rubber Aquanaut. If I had to choose one, I can't make up my mind though.

Thoughts?

Both are great and many people own and wear both. It's almost like asking which is better, a Sub date or an Explorer 1? No wrong answer. Try to find one of each to try on your wrist before making a purchase though because you may like one better than the other in person.

hbk25 · 13 October 2016, 07:11 AM

Dress up, dress down, hospital scrubs, sport, pool/beach, and all the while keeping it under the radar with that tropical, non-bling strap. I'm a one watch guy, definitely the minority here, and this just fits my life right now.

brmeyers · 13 October 2016, 10:08 AM

Really tough call, only definitive answer is get both.
I currently have a 5167R.
Love the SS 5167 too.
I like the sportiness of the 5167 a tad more than
the 5711. It seems more of a modern and cool look to me IMO.
(I usually dress very casual).

Here is a thread I posted with that very same question that might be helpful:
http://www.rolexforums.com/showthrea...=434441&page=3

lapince · 13 October 2016, 10:34 AM

Both of course, my answer is a little more expensive, but I got the 5712 and 5167R, which IMO, are the best of each line, the RG Aquanaut just pops, amazing in the sun, and the 5712 has the same case and blue as the 5711, with a few complications which I really like, the PR and moon phase are 2 simple complications that are useful for the PR, and nice to look at for the MP. If I really had to choose, luckily I don't, I would pick the 5712, or in a duel 5711/5167 would pick the 5711, the Aqua is an awesome watch in it's own right, but the Nautilus is so sexy

texex91 · 13 October 2016, 11:12 AM

Grab a 5980 or 5990 and call it a day.

But from those choices 5711.

RolexAviator · 13 October 2016, 11:28 AM

I went with the 5711 for many reasons. History and iconic design/status were at the forefront. Also, the dial on the 5711 is mesmerizing and pictures truly do not do it justice. Can't go wrong with either

mps354 · 13 October 2016, 11:29 AM

I have both, would choose the 5711 if I could only have one

soundserious · 13 October 2016, 11:57 AM

I had both, 5711 is still around. Didn't feel like I needed two watches with that movement.

subtona · 13 October 2016, 01:58 PM

Had both, 5711 no question.

sgwatch · 13 October 2016, 02:47 PM

I'd pick the Aquanaut. I really like how light this watch is on the rubber strap. It is so comfortable, you hardly know you are wearing a watch. But to be fair, I like some of the Nautilus versions. You have great options!

Lordofrolex · 13 October 2016, 03:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by flex368

i think there´s only one right answer.

x2

KarlS · 13 October 2016, 05:57 PM

Have both. Prefer the metal bracelet and thus if 5167 would go if I had to sell

nakedtoes · 13 October 2016, 06:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by locutus49

I prefer metal bracelets so I like the 5711.

Quote:

Originally Posted by beshannon

Exactly why I chose a 5711

nakedtoes · 13 October 2016, 07:01 PM

Actually i very much prefer the 5711... the Classical Genta design .. however i discover a tiny flaw in the case design cause it is a top and bottom case design and need a black rubber or silicon seal inbetween them. Thus i read and search many forum and there are cases of water ingress in 5711 which might due to the wear and tear of the seal .. My next watch is going to be 5712 and i need to research properly so that the watch can really last long..

topcat30093 · 13 October 2016, 08:00 PM

In the past I have been fortunate to own both.
IMO,it depends on how you will be using the watch.
Personally I see the Aquanaut as a tool watch and great to be worn under most circumstances.
In recent years I have become a strap fan, though I liked the 5711A it always worried me about marking the bracelet.
Recently I traded my SDc 4000 for an Aquanaut, which fits my wrist like a glove and I have no worries when I catch the rubber strap :)

ap1 · 13 October 2016, 09:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by subtona

Had both, 5711 no question.

This

christianj · 13 October 2016, 10:07 PM

This is a topic that comes up regularly and it is always interesting to hear others opinions.

I started out with the 5711 and then couldn't stop thinking about the 5167 so 2-3 years later I added one to my collection. I am impressed by the 5167 since it seems to be more of a versatile watch and honestly one of my most comfortable watches. So far so good but here comes the kicker....I'm now toying with the idea of selling the 5167 to upgrade to the 5164. Why? Even though I like both watches I think they are indeed very similar in shape and design.

So to summarize...the first Patek you pick probably won't be your last and then figuring out where to go will drive you nuts.

13 October 2016, 02:02 AM	#1
sunnycarp "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2016 Location: Asia Posts: 27	Patek Nautilus VS Aquanaut Patek Nautilus (SS) VS Aquanaut (either rubber or SS), which would you pick and why? I used to think the Nautilus SS was nice, but recently I grew to like the look of the rubber Aquanaut. If I had to choose one, I can't make up my mind though. Thoughts?

13 October 2016, 04:24 AM	#10
Passionata "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: N/A Watch: the girls Posts: 7,095	Patek Nautilus VS Aquanaut Nautilus iPhone/Tapatalk __________________ Best George "Also remember that feet don't get fat and a watch will always speak volumes." Robert Johnston --------------------- newhttps://youtu.be/EljAF-uddhE new http://youtu.be/ZmpLoO1Q8eQ IG @passionata1

13 October 2016, 06:41 AM	#13
MattCH "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2016 Location: EU Watch: PP/ROLEX Posts: 165	Nautilus. Then aquanaut. But if you have to decide just on one piece. Go for the 5711. Is a fantastic dress watch, and the bracelet is a beauty. __________________

13 October 2016, 11:57 AM	#21
soundserious "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: usofmfa Posts: 3,157	I had both, 5711 is still around. Didn't feel like I needed two watches with that movement. __________________ Instagram: soundsoserious

13 October 2016, 01:58 PM	#22
subtona "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Real Name: gus Location: East Coast Watch: APK & sometimes Y Posts: 26,543	Had both, 5711 no question. __________________

13 October 2016, 02:50 AM	#3
Flex368 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2014 Real Name: Felix Location: GMT +1 Watch: Yes! Posts: 3,052	I think there´s only one right answer.

13 October 2016, 03:10 AM	#4
arejay "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2014 Posts: 86	I ended up getting the 5164 because the wait list for the 5167 was 3-4 years in Japan and the 7211 nautilus is 5 years. Availability affected my purchasing decision. Don't think I'm disappointed though. I did end up buying a 5167 SS bracelet to try on my 5164. Sadly, no wrist shot because it's being re polished and repaired for the last month (and maybe longer.) Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

13 October 2016, 03:18 AM	#5
locutus49 Banned Join Date: May 2014 Real Name: John Location: La Jolla, CA Watch: Platona Posts: 12,194	I prefer metal bracelets so I like the 5711.

13 October 2016, 03:28 AM	#6
liu_watch "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: FL Posts: 667	If you ask for general opinion, the answer is clear - Nautilus is a more popular line. But all comes down to your preference. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

13 October 2016, 04:22 AM	#9
JapRs "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2015 Location: Earth Watch: RolexPatek Posts: 664	Both But in my case I have gone for the 5164a first...just like it a bit more

13 October 2016, 04:40 AM	#11
lovej "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Real Name: James Location: Melbourne Watch: 15400 Posts: 246	Sometimes I prefer the subtle delicacy of the nautilus bracelet and other days the arguably more interesting aquanaut dial. Sent from my SM-N920I using Tapatalk

13 October 2016, 07:11 AM	#15
hbk25 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2016 Real Name: Eric Location: US Watch: Z Blue Posts: 178	Dress up, dress down, hospital scrubs, sport, pool/beach, and all the while keeping it under the radar with that tropical, non-bling strap. I'm a one watch guy, definitely the minority here, and this just fits my life right now.

13 October 2016, 10:08 AM	#16
brmeyers "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2015 Real Name: Bryant Location: Florida Watch: ...Your Thoughts Posts: 2,171	Really tough call, only definitive answer is get both. I currently have a 5167R. Love the SS 5167 too. I like the sportiness of the 5167 a tad more than the 5711. It seems more of a modern and cool look to me IMO. (I usually dress very casual). Here is a thread I posted with that very same question that might be helpful: http://www.rolexforums.com/showthrea...=434441&page=3

13 October 2016, 10:34 AM	#17
lapince "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2013 Location: Mars Watch: 5712 Posts: 11,509	Both of course, my answer is a little more expensive, but I got the 5712 and 5167R, which IMO, are the best of each line, the RG Aquanaut just pops, amazing in the sun, and the 5712 has the same case and blue as the 5711, with a few complications which I really like, the PR and moon phase are 2 simple complications that are useful for the PR, and nice to look at for the MP. If I really had to choose, luckily I don't, I would pick the 5712, or in a duel 5711/5167 would pick the 5711, the Aqua is an awesome watch in it's own right, but the Nautilus is so sexy

13 October 2016, 11:12 AM	#18
texex91 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2007 Location: . Posts: 17,898	Grab a 5980 or 5990 and call it a day. But from those choices 5711.

13 October 2016, 11:28 AM	#19
RolexAviator "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2016 Location: USA Watch: 126610LV Posts: 324	I went with the 5711 for many reasons. History and iconic design/status were at the forefront. Also, the dial on the 5711 is mesmerizing and pictures truly do not do it justice. Can't go wrong with either

13 October 2016, 11:29 AM	#20
mps354 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2012 Real Name: Mike Location: CT Posts: 9,094	I have both, would choose the 5711 if I could only have one

13 October 2016, 02:47 PM	#23
sgwatch "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: Seattle Posts: 432	I'd pick the Aquanaut. I really like how light this watch is on the rubber strap. It is so comfortable, you hardly know you are wearing a watch. But to be fair, I like some of the Nautilus versions. You have great options!

13 October 2016, 05:57 PM	#25
KarlS Banned Join Date: Nov 2015 Real Name: Karl Location: Kuwait Posts: 5,228	Have both. Prefer the metal bracelet and thus if 5167 would go if I had to sell

13 October 2016, 07:01 PM	#27
nakedtoes "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: singapore Posts: 122	Actually i very much prefer the 5711... the Classical Genta design .. however i discover a tiny flaw in the case design cause it is a top and bottom case design and need a black rubber or silicon seal inbetween them. Thus i read and search many forum and there are cases of water ingress in 5711 which might due to the wear and tear of the seal .. My next watch is going to be 5712 and i need to research properly so that the watch can really last long..

13 October 2016, 08:00 PM	#28
topcat30093 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Real Name: Tony Location: England Posts: 5,449	In the past I have been fortunate to own both. IMO,it depends on how you will be using the watch. Personally I see the Aquanaut as a tool watch and great to be worn under most circumstances. In recent years I have become a strap fan, though I liked the 5711A it always worried me about marking the bracelet. Recently I traded my SDc 4000 for an Aquanaut, which fits my wrist like a glove and I have no worries when I catch the rubber strap :) __________________

13 October 2016, 10:07 PM	#30
christianj Banned Join Date: May 2013 Location: CT Posts: 562	This is a topic that comes up regularly and it is always interesting to hear others opinions. I started out with the 5711 and then couldn't stop thinking about the 5167 so 2-3 years later I added one to my collection. I am impressed by the 5167 since it seems to be more of a versatile watch and honestly one of my most comfortable watches. So far so good but here comes the kicker....I'm now toying with the idea of selling the 5167 to upgrade to the 5164. Why? Even though I like both watches I think they are indeed very similar in shape and design. So to summarize...the first Patek you pick probably won't be your last and then figuring out where to go will drive you nuts.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)