|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
6 November 2016, 08:07 AM
|
#1 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: USA
Watch: Good ones
Posts: 8,608
|
Recommended smaller Panerai
I had a Pam 005, but I am small and thin wristed, so I felt that it was too big for me. I do miss it.
Can anyone recommend a smaller (42?) Panerai at a reasonable cost? |
|
|
|
6 November 2016, 08:10 AM
|
#2 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: Lee
Location: USA
Watch: me go broke
Posts: 133
|
The PAM 392 is 42mm.
__________________
♛Ω♛Ω♛Ω♛ |
|
|
|
|
6 November 2016, 08:24 AM
|
#3 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Real Name: Huy
Location: Bay Area
Watch: FPJ Octa Lune
Posts: 143
|
I have a gen Pam00048 that's 40mm and it wears perfectly for my small wrist.
If you're looking for a 42mm...I would recommend to look at the Pam 676 that just came out. However none of the TDs have the right starbusrt dial locked down to gen specs yet. Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk
__________________
"The trouble is, you think you have time." - Buddha 2FA activated |
|
|
|
|
6 November 2016, 08:40 AM
|
#4 |
|
2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: CET
Posts: 36,169
|
While the 392 is 42, it's still pretty thick.
Consider the 512 or 337. 
|
|
|
|
6 November 2016, 08:53 AM
|
#5 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 26,845
|
Maybe find 40mm Pam
|
|
|
|
|
6 November 2016, 10:59 AM
|
#6 |
|
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Boston
Posts: 82
|
512
|
|
|
|
|
6 November 2016, 10:59 AM
|
#7 |
|
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Mike
Location: CT
Posts: 9,193
|
512 or 574
|
|
|
|
|
7 November 2016, 04:50 AM
|
#8 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: London, England
Posts: 81
|
The PAM 1392 is the new version of the 392, but with a thinner movement/case. The PAM 233, although 44mm, wears well on small wrists due to the thin case and you get a gorgeous dome crystal as well.
|
|
|
|
|
7 November 2016, 11:42 AM
|
#9 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: USA
Watch: Good ones
Posts: 8,608
|
Thanks for the recommendations!
|
|
|
|
|
10 November 2016, 03:51 AM
|
#10 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: South Florida
Watch: Panerai/JLC
Posts: 16
|
PAM523? or a 310 if you can find one - 676 is a neat one, very very light and thin
|
|
|
|
|
10 November 2016, 09:05 AM
|
#11 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 880
|
I just tried on a 512 and it was very nice.
|
|
|
|
|
10 November 2016, 12:49 PM
|
#12 |
|
2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: usa
Posts: 19,878
|
1392
|
|
|
|
|
11 November 2016, 02:49 AM
|
#13 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: USA
Watch: Good ones
Posts: 8,608
|
Thoughts on a PAM 48?
It looks like it's 40mm.
|
|
|
|
|
12 November 2016, 01:27 AM
|
#14 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,855
|
Quote:
http://www.panerai.com/en/collection...p=setTopSearch
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 November 2016, 01:41 AM
|
#15 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Delaware
Posts: 96
|
512 is amazing, I'm mad I didn't jump on one I could have had for an amazing price in mint condition. Still kicking myself
|
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
Linear Mode
