ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Fedpete · 10 December 2016, 12:41 AM

Hey Guys--

What's your take on the Blancpain Bathyscaphe and how do you think it fairs against a classic diver such as the 114060.

I know Blancpain has an incredible amount of diver heritage--never actually handled a Bathyscaphe in the metal--wondering how fit and finish compares to Rolex.

Chime in! Thanks a ton!

ap1 · 10 December 2016, 12:59 AM

FF is higher I'd say. I owned one for a short while - it was about then I realized 43 too large
For my 6.5 wrist. Love the bezel / sailcloth / long power reserve. The hour markers are very shiny so be prepared for that

sechsgang · 10 December 2016, 01:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ap1

FF is higher I'd say. I owned one for a short while - it was about then I realized 43 too large
For my 6.5 wrist. Love the bezel / sailcloth / long power reserve. The hour markers are very shiny so be prepared for that

This. BP is a higher level of watchmaker IMHO than Rolex, but its more about the individual fit for you with that model than the other features. Granted if you have a 7 inch or bigger wrist that shouldnt be much be much of a problem

southcarolina1801 · 10 December 2016, 01:27 AM

Me personally, despite the heritage and history, I think the Blancpain looks cheap. I don't like it at all.

GradyPhilpott · 10 December 2016, 03:51 AM

I personally prefer the 114060.

Rocco21 · 10 December 2016, 03:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GradyPhilpott

I personally prefer the 114060.

Me too.

Loevhagen · 10 December 2016, 03:57 AM

The Blancpain Bathyscaphe looks like a sketch idea not matured - compared to the bold and fully developed design of the 114060.

mdgrwl · 10 December 2016, 03:58 AM

I've owned the 114060, its now gone.

I still own the stainless Bathyscaphe. Its very unique with a minimalistic, less is more approach to the dial which I really dig.

The 114060 has a classic design but I dare to say I like the 14060 better. The new supercases have way to much of a squared off lug for my taste. Looks like a square on your wrist.

Loevhagen · 10 December 2016, 04:10 AM

For me, the design of a watch lies mostly in the dial and hand design - and case design second. Hence, the BB is too anemic compared to the balanced 114060. IM(H)O.

AJMarcus · 10 December 2016, 04:38 AM

Rolex submariner. But this is TRF. I thought about the bathyscape myself once. But to me it just looks like an ORis on steroids.

beshannon · 10 December 2016, 04:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by southcarolina1801

Me personally, despite the heritage and history, I think the Blancpain looks cheap. I don't like it at all.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Loevhagen

The Blancpain Bathyscaphe looks like a sketch idea not matured - compared to the bold and fully developed design of the 114060.

I agree

brogue · 10 December 2016, 05:01 AM

Personally I would take the sub by a mile

Vinyasa · 10 December 2016, 05:58 AM

I would have seriously considered the Bathyscaphe, were it not for the 43mm size... too big for my 6.5" wrist. It has many of the attributes I value: fully graduated bezel, date with no cyclops, and exhibition case back. Went the SD4K route instead.

strange · 10 December 2016, 06:25 AM

Bathyscape is such a nice watch.

KBM · 10 December 2016, 06:37 AM

Against the Bathyscape, it's an easy choice in favor of the sub. A FF would be harder, although I'd probably still go for the sub.

psv · 10 December 2016, 06:38 AM

Submariner out of those two. Easily.

jmolsberg · 10 December 2016, 09:07 AM

Subc nd all day but I do like the blancpain

polaris72 · 10 December 2016, 09:10 AM

Both. Love my Rolex, hope to purchase Bathyscaphe one day...

Timesurfer · 10 December 2016, 10:27 AM

There is one with Chronograph, I assume you are talking about the one without?

I'd go with Sub every day, every time!

AK797 · 10 December 2016, 10:37 AM

Bathyscape is a bit too bland for me and the FF maybe a bit too much in size and thickness, the Subc is just right.

shoresguy · 10 December 2016, 11:32 AM

I was fascinated by bp ff but only for a short while. I think it's more of a "crush" and then it goes away, then onto something else. But sub (mine is 14060) stays with you, the feeling of engagement is always there, non-fleeting, a joy to look at every single day:)

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Afghanvet · 10 December 2016, 01:03 PM

114060 all the way!

Muzz · 10 December 2016, 08:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AK797

Bathyscape is a bit too bland for me and the FF maybe a bit too much in size and thickness, the Subc is just right.

After owning the FF and several Subc examples it is the Sub that still remains in my collection. I completely agree Neil!!

1William · 10 December 2016, 10:51 PM

The FF is a nice watch but the 114060 is the watch for me. Almost perfect for the SS sports watch.

10 December 2016, 12:41 AM	#1
Fedpete "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2010 Location: usa Posts: 747	Bathyscaphe vs Rolex 114060 Hey Guys-- What's your take on the Blancpain Bathyscaphe and how do you think it fairs against a classic diver such as the 114060. I know Blancpain has an incredible amount of diver heritage--never actually handled a Bathyscaphe in the metal--wondering how fit and finish compares to Rolex. Chime in! Thanks a ton!

10 December 2016, 03:51 AM	#5
GradyPhilpott 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: New Mexico Watch: Seiko #SRK050 Posts: 34,447	I personally prefer the 114060. __________________ JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner

10 December 2016, 01:03 PM	#22
Afghanvet "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2015 Location: Virginia Watch: Subs, SD4K Posts: 2,272	114060 all the way! __________________ Subaholics Anonymous

10 December 2016, 12:59 AM	#2
ap1 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Mar 2013 Location: usa Posts: 19,509	FF is higher I'd say. I owned one for a short while - it was about then I realized 43 too large For my 6.5 wrist. Love the bezel / sailcloth / long power reserve. The hour markers are very shiny so be prepared for that

10 December 2016, 01:27 AM	#4
southcarolina1801 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2009 Location: The Peach State Posts: 735	Me personally, despite the heritage and history, I think the Blancpain looks cheap. I don't like it at all.

10 December 2016, 03:57 AM	#7
Loevhagen "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2014 Location: The aperture Posts: 4,941	The Blancpain Bathyscaphe looks like a sketch idea not matured - compared to the bold and fully developed design of the 114060.

10 December 2016, 03:58 AM	#8
mdgrwl 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2015 Location: US East Coast Watch: Dealer Posts: 15,517	I've owned the 114060, its now gone. I still own the stainless Bathyscaphe. Its very unique with a minimalistic, less is more approach to the dial which I really dig. The 114060 has a classic design but I dare to say I like the 14060 better. The new supercases have way to much of a squared off lug for my taste. Looks like a square on your wrist.

10 December 2016, 04:10 AM	#9
Loevhagen "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2014 Location: The aperture Posts: 4,941	For me, the design of a watch lies mostly in the dial and hand design - and case design second. Hence, the BB is too anemic compared to the balanced 114060. IM(H)O.

10 December 2016, 04:38 AM	#10
AJMarcus "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Real Name: AJ Location: USA Watch: Swiss Posts: 5,236	Rolex submariner. But this is TRF. I thought about the bathyscape myself once. But to me it just looks like an ORis on steroids.

10 December 2016, 05:01 AM	#12
brogue Banned Join Date: Dec 2015 Location: usa Posts: 62	Personally I would take the sub by a mile

10 December 2016, 05:58 AM	#13
Vinyasa "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2016 Real Name: Steve Location: Maine Watch: Explorer II 16570 Posts: 1,396	I would have seriously considered the Bathyscaphe, were it not for the 43mm size... too big for my 6.5" wrist. It has many of the attributes I value: fully graduated bezel, date with no cyclops, and exhibition case back. Went the SD4K route instead.

10 December 2016, 06:25 AM	#14
strange "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2016 Location: Marbella Posts: 21	Bathyscape is such a nice watch.

10 December 2016, 06:37 AM	#15
KBM 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Real Name: K. Location: 780 Posts: 10,451	Against the Bathyscape, it's an easy choice in favor of the sub. A FF would be harder, although I'd probably still go for the sub.

10 December 2016, 06:38 AM	#16
psv 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: USA & France Posts: 11,078	Submariner out of those two. Easily.

10 December 2016, 09:07 AM	#17
jmolsberg "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2014 Real Name: Jan-Michael Location: Fort Worth Watch: ROLEX Posts: 423	Subc nd all day but I do like the blancpain

10 December 2016, 09:10 AM	#18
polaris72 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Feb 2015 Location: U.S./Vienna, AT Posts: 1,967	Both. Love my Rolex, hope to purchase Bathyscaphe one day...

10 December 2016, 10:27 AM	#19
Timesurfer "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2015 Location: 12,000+ Lakes! Watch: 16710 Daytona BLNR Posts: 840	There is one with Chronograph, I assume you are talking about the one without? I'd go with Sub every day, every time!

10 December 2016, 10:37 AM	#20
AK797 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Neil Location: UK Watch: ing ships roll in Posts: 59,368	Bathyscape is a bit too bland for me and the FF maybe a bit too much in size and thickness, the Subc is just right.

10 December 2016, 11:32 AM	#21
shoresguy "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2016 Location: san diego Posts: 240	I was fascinated by bp ff but only for a short while. I think it's more of a "crush" and then it goes away, then onto something else. But sub (mine is 14060) stays with you, the feeling of engagement is always there, non-fleeting, a joy to look at every single day:) Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

10 December 2016, 10:51 PM	#24
1William 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: North Carolina Watch: Rolex/Others Posts: 47,580	The FF is a nice watch but the 114060 is the watch for me. Almost perfect for the SS sports watch.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)