ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

hhcave · 28 December 2016, 09:09 AM

Just want to confirm whether the ROC is too big for my wrist and whether thr 15202 looks right? Should i also be looking at the 15450?

Bonus shot of my SD4k for size reference

Thanks

masterserg · 28 December 2016, 09:46 AM

Both look good to me.

Hairdude1 · 28 December 2016, 09:47 AM

agree with Serge, both look great

locutus49 · 28 December 2016, 09:51 AM

Middle gold one looks best to me.

scrappy · 28 December 2016, 10:40 AM

ROC is too big - go for the 15202.

texex91 · 28 December 2016, 10:43 AM

202 gets my vote.

anothernewphone · 28 December 2016, 10:44 AM

202 for sure.

toucan · 28 December 2016, 10:52 AM

15202

csquared317 · 28 December 2016, 11:04 AM

I like the 15202.

AK797 · 28 December 2016, 12:30 PM

You can wear both.

srvrf · 28 December 2016, 12:39 PM

The ROC 26320s look too big to me, but a side shot could show how much overhang there really is. I have a 6.5" wrist and think that the smaller 39mm 25860 fits perfectly. The 26300s are also 39mm if you want to go with a chronograph, otherwise I think the fit of the 15202 is better.

yoast · 28 December 2016, 01:43 PM

I vote 202

Andrés G · 28 December 2016, 02:04 PM

The 15202 looks better.

gummy · 28 December 2016, 02:59 PM

ROC owner here... On your wrist I like the 15202!

Ele · 28 December 2016, 04:49 PM

I always like the chrono , I love those dial

subtona · 28 December 2016, 05:24 PM

202

dr.ns23 · 28 December 2016, 10:09 PM

15202

ndrenfro · 28 December 2016, 10:52 PM

Both look good

the_Hunter · 28 December 2016, 10:57 PM

the ROC looks huge on you. The 15202 looks great

csi-n · 28 December 2016, 11:32 PM

Although both look okay, my vote goes to the ROC.

benlee · 29 December 2016, 01:02 AM

202 the better fit although ROC looks ok as wel

Dolor Doc · 29 December 2016, 01:07 AM

Both can work.

You see a little bit more bracelet on the top with the 202, but if you prefer the ROC, I think it looks great.

They are two totally different watches in terms of size, weight, and complications. Go for the look you prefer.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

GB-man · 29 December 2016, 01:40 AM

202 ftw

Manofsteelpt · 29 December 2016, 02:42 AM

Full RG Jumbo vs SS ROC is Not a very fair comparison... GL with your decision.

KBM · 29 December 2016, 04:31 AM

Size wise, the 202 truly looks better on you!

Peterandwatches · 29 December 2016, 08:56 AM

Both look great - I find myself nowdays learning toward the sportier side of AP, so I think the Chrono, or even an ROO would be a nice choice, and this is coming from someone who used to hate ROOs.

5Zigen · 29 December 2016, 11:56 AM

Sizing of the 202 is better on your wrist size but the ROC works too. Boils down to size, weight and complication you want.

chuey38 · 30 December 2016, 08:29 AM

202 imho. Could also consider dual time in 39mm.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

travisb · 30 December 2016, 11:05 PM

Both look good. I'll always pick the Jumbo.

kneedeep · 31 December 2016, 01:08 AM

Jumbo looks better IMO

28 December 2016, 09:09 AM	#1
hhcave "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2013 Real Name: HC Location: London, UK Watch: Sea-Dweller 4000 Posts: 186	15202 vs ROC Just want to confirm whether the ROC is too big for my wrist and whether thr 15202 looks right? Should i also be looking at the 15450? Bonus shot of my SD4k for size reference Thanks Attached Images

28 December 2016, 09:46 AM	#2
masterserg "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2011 Real Name: Serg Location: US of A Watch: AP Posts: 7,437	Both look good to me. __________________ How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer meat????

28 December 2016, 09:47 AM	#3
Hairdude1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2012 Real Name: Alex Location: Chicago Watch: AP,PP, Rolex Posts: 37,156	agree with Serge, both look great __________________ Instagram: @Hairdude Watches in Collection 5070R, 5522A, 214270 MK1, 228238 16750, 26401, 5711, 116718, 116710LN, 116300, 16710"Coke", 372, 15300, 15703 (All Flipped) Official Member "Perpetual 30" Las Vegas GTG 2016 Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2017 Official Member 'WIS-CON' Las Vegas Int'l GTG 2018

28 December 2016, 01:43 PM	#12
yoast "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2013 Location: HK Posts: 2,290	I vote 202 __________________ IG: @yoast.watch https://www.instagram.com/yoast.watch/

28 December 2016, 05:24 PM	#16
subtona 2025 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Real Name: gus Location: East Coast Watch: APK & sometimes Y Posts: 26,744	202 __________________

28 December 2016, 09:51 AM	#4
locutus49 Banned Join Date: May 2014 Real Name: John Location: La Jolla, CA Watch: Platona Posts: 12,193	Middle gold one looks best to me.

28 December 2016, 10:40 AM	#5
scrappy "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2013 Posts: 623	ROC is too big - go for the 15202.

28 December 2016, 10:43 AM	#6
texex91 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2007 Location: . Posts: 17,898	202 gets my vote.

28 December 2016, 10:44 AM	#7
anothernewphone Banned Join Date: Feb 2013 Real Name: Bill Location: Plymouth Meeting Watch: 116520 Posts: 3,209	202 for sure.

28 December 2016, 10:52 AM	#8
toucan "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2013 Location: NYC Watch: 5970 Posts: 1,980	15202

28 December 2016, 11:04 AM	#9
csquared317 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2016 Location: HK Posts: 114	I like the 15202.

28 December 2016, 12:30 PM	#10
AK797 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Neil Location: UK Watch: ing ships roll in Posts: 59,369	You can wear both.

28 December 2016, 12:39 PM	#11
srvrf 2025 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2013 Real Name: Steve Location: Indiana Watch: PP/AP/VC Posts: 2,180	The ROC 26320s look too big to me, but a side shot could show how much overhang there really is. I have a 6.5" wrist and think that the smaller 39mm 25860 fits perfectly. The 26300s are also 39mm if you want to go with a chronograph, otherwise I think the fit of the 15202 is better.

28 December 2016, 02:04 PM	#13
Andrés G "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: Guatemala Posts: 3,392	The 15202 looks better.

28 December 2016, 02:59 PM	#14
gummy 2025 Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2012 Real Name: Thomas Location: Midwest USA Watch: AP PP Rolex Posts: 3,354	ROC owner here... On your wrist I like the 15202!

28 December 2016, 04:49 PM	#15
Ele "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2013 Location: Vancouver Posts: 16	I always like the chrono , I love those dial

28 December 2016, 10:09 PM	#17
dr.ns23 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Somewhere Watch: 15202 Posts: 436	15202

28 December 2016, 10:52 PM	#18
ndrenfro 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2015 Location: NC, USA Posts: 106	Both look good

28 December 2016, 10:57 PM	#19
the_Hunter "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2015 Location: Dallas, Tx Watch: Pepsi Posts: 663	the ROC looks huge on you. The 15202 looks great __________________ Instagram: MR.HGB03

28 December 2016, 11:32 PM	#20
csi-n "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2013 Real Name: Sam Location: Arkansas Posts: 1,042	Although both look okay, my vote goes to the ROC.

29 December 2016, 01:02 AM	#21
benlee "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2012 Real Name: Ben Location: SIN & JKT Watch: Rolex, AP, PP Posts: 9,874	202 the better fit although ROC looks ok as wel __________________ Follow me on Instagram : benlee789

29 December 2016, 01:07 AM	#22
Dolor Doc "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2016 Location: 'merica Watch: AP 15400 Posts: 151	Both can work. You see a little bit more bracelet on the top with the 202, but if you prefer the ROC, I think it looks great. They are two totally different watches in terms of size, weight, and complications. Go for the look you prefer. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

29 December 2016, 01:40 AM	#23
GB-man 2025 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2012 Location: USA Watch: addiction issues Posts: 37,623	202 ftw __________________

29 December 2016, 02:42 AM	#24
Manofsteelpt "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2011 Real Name: Mike Location: Buffalo, NY Posts: 3,971	Full RG Jumbo vs SS ROC is Not a very fair comparison... GL with your decision.

29 December 2016, 04:31 AM	#25
KBM 2025 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Real Name: K. Location: 780 Posts: 10,480	Size wise, the 202 truly looks better on you!

29 December 2016, 08:56 AM	#26
Peterandwatches "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2015 Location: WA Watch: 5167/15400/Sub/JLC Posts: 1,023	Both look great - I find myself nowdays learning toward the sportier side of AP, so I think the Chrono, or even an ROO would be a nice choice, and this is coming from someone who used to hate ROOs.

29 December 2016, 11:56 AM	#27
5Zigen 2025 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2014 Location: Canada Watch: PP, AP, Rolex Posts: 750	Sizing of the 202 is better on your wrist size but the ROC works too. Boils down to size, weight and complication you want.

30 December 2016, 08:29 AM	#28
chuey38 Banned Join Date: Jun 2016 Location: UK Watch: 15202 Posts: 184	202 imho. Could also consider dual time in 39mm. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

30 December 2016, 11:05 PM	#29
travisb "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Real Name: Travis Location: FL / NYC Watch: Yes.. Posts: 33,812	Both look good. I'll always pick the Jumbo.

31 December 2016, 01:08 AM	#30
kneedeep "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2014 Location: Not 2 far from u Posts: 3,457	Jumbo looks better IMO

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)