![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
![]() |
#1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Fl
Watch: 116610LV,Pam etc.
Posts: 1,329
|
42mm what do you think,too big or not !!
Hi Guys,
I've been looking at the 216570 polar but I can't try one locally unless I drive 2hrs. My wrist size is 7.25", I know the best thing to do is to try it in person and that every wrist is different , but just want to hear your opinion from guys that have or have tried both 216570 and any of the new Maxi case 40mm models, is there a big difference? I had a 16570 for a few years and always found it a bit small compared to the bluesy I had previously. This is how a 40mm maxi case looks on my wrist, so wondering if a 42mm Polar will be ok or too big!! TIA. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: CJ
Location: Kashyyyk
Watch: Kessel Run Chrono
Posts: 21,110
|
looks ok.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Scotland
Watch: Omega-Rolex
Posts: 230
|
I have the 40mm GMT and my brother in law has the 42mm explorer 2 I didn't like it on myself felt too big I have a 7" wrist and also have a omega speedy 42mm and that feels fine. Guess you really need to try it on
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: USA
Watch: All Rolex
Posts: 7,024
|
I think you would be just fine with the Exp 2. I'd just be sure that it fits under your dress shirt cuffs if you wish to wear it with a suit and/or you wear your sleeves tighter.
BTW the LV fits you well ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Silicon Valley
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 4,182
|
I don't think you will have any issues.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: The Matrix
Posts: 1,070
|
Relax... itll be fine
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,950
|
Wait for the new 43mm SD
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Fl
Watch: 116610LV,Pam etc.
Posts: 1,329
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Rick
Location: LSU
Watch: Constantly changes
Posts: 3,815
|
42 is perfect for me
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Fl
Watch: 116610LV,Pam etc.
Posts: 1,329
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 628
|
I think the EXP2 wears slimmer than the sub, despite the 42mm size.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Josh
Location: Lost in time
Watch: Me Nae Nae
Posts: 9,823
|
I think it will look just fine.
__________________
"Sometimes the songs that we hear are just songs of our own." -Jerome J. Garcia, Robert C. Hunter ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Real Name: Steve
Location: U.K.
Watch: 321, Snoopy 3
Posts: 4,504
|
Judging by the 40, you will have no issues with the 42 mate.....
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.