ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: Submariner or GMT-Master II for everyday wear? | |||
Sub | 119 | 47.41% | |
GMT | 132 | 52.59% | |
Voters: 251. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
26 May 2017, 07:59 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: UCLA
Watch: 126000, 11623
Posts: 119
|
Sub or GMT?
Which do you prefer for everyday wear? For the sake of fair comparison, compare as SS models.
|
26 May 2017, 08:01 PM | #2 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 63,986
|
GMT for me.
__________________
SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT |
26 May 2017, 08:04 PM | #3 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Real Name: Merle
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,523
|
The GMT does it all, so the decision is easy for me.
|
26 May 2017, 08:04 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: UCLA
Watch: 126000, 11623
Posts: 119
|
Interesting results so far lol
|
26 May 2017, 08:11 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Real Name: Andrew
Location: Australia
Watch: 116710BLNR 126334
Posts: 432
|
Sub for me as I don't need the gmt function and prefer the timing bezel
|
26 May 2017, 08:17 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Montreal, QC
Posts: 1,256
|
Sub!
GMT is too busy and in this day and age, quite honestly the GMT function is useless. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
AP Royal Oak [15400ST.01] Rolex DateJust 41 [126334] Rolex Submariner Date [116610LV] Rolex GMT Master II [116710BLNR] Rolex Cosmograph Daytona [116500LN] |
26 May 2017, 08:19 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Sandy
Location: England.
Watch: 14060M 2 liner
Posts: 3,204
|
Sub.
|
26 May 2017, 08:19 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Paris
Posts: 1
|
Sub easy!
Envoyé de mon iPhone en utilisant Tapatalk |
26 May 2017, 08:23 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: USA
Watch: GMTs
Posts: 254
|
I'm in the same boat. I have GMT blnr and I was thinking of adding a sub. I feel the sub is more of an everyday watch. I'm still debating between datejust, explore II and a sub.
|
26 May 2017, 08:36 PM | #11 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: In Motion
Watch: my wrist presence
Posts: 7,436
|
GMT but BLNR for a little color ...
|
26 May 2017, 08:38 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Northern NJ
Watch: 16613T
Posts: 92
|
No date sub for this guy
👍 Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk
__________________
16234 116710 116610LV 114060 16613T |
26 May 2017, 08:40 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Rich
Location: Canada
Watch: Milgauss, GMT IIc
Posts: 3,013
|
GMT for me. Very useful complication when I travel.
|
26 May 2017, 08:42 PM | #14 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 77,711
|
Sub for me. I prefer the timing bezel and the Glidelock bracelet of the 6 digits.
|
26 May 2017, 08:43 PM | #15 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 47,566
|
I prefer the Submariner hands down. I don't need the GMT function, PLC's or busier dial and bezel. I also think that the Glidelock clasp is the best in the market and makes a huge difference in how the watch wears.
|
26 May 2017, 08:44 PM | #16 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Rod
Location: USA & UAE
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 766
|
GMT, allows me to monitor 2 different time zones.
__________________
"I collect Rolex because I love'um and dig'um" |
26 May 2017, 09:00 PM | #17 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Ed
Location: East Hampton NY
Watch: me break clays..
Posts: 7,515
|
Big fan of the glide lock would have to go sub
__________________
Rolex•Omega•Breitling•Grand Seiko•Tudor "No one on their death bed ever said I wish I worked more" My Grandma * Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons * |
26 May 2017, 09:03 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Here
Posts: 999
|
Sub for me. Don't need a GMT function and much prefer the timing bezel and Glidelock. Also like the no-date look which I can get in the Sub.
|
26 May 2017, 09:05 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Brian
Location: Northern Virginia
Watch: One of Not Many
Posts: 17,892
|
Both, I rotate them
__________________
IWC Portugieser 7 Day, Omega Seamaster SMP300m, Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete Calendar, Glashutte PanoInverse, Glashutte SeaQ Panorama Date, Omega Aqua Terra 150, Omega CK 859, Omega Speedmaster 3861 Moonwatch, Breitling Superocean Steelfish, JLC Atmos Transparent Clock |
26 May 2017, 09:20 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,125
|
Please explain - what is it about this day and age that renders a GMT function useless? to the OP's question, I have both watches and the GMT is my default daily wear. This is because I find the GMT function useful as it means I can see what time it is at head office (NY) at a glance. If I never had to think about different time zones then i would still have a GMT as I think it is a cool watch, but I reckon the Sub would be my daily. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
26 May 2017, 09:33 PM | #21 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Richard
Location: GA
Watch: YTBD
Posts: 23,451
|
Tough choice for daily wearer....either is a great choice, looks and function wise.
If you have to choose one...first question is...do you NEED either complication? If so, the answer is pretty easy. If no need for one or the other complication....which bezel do you prefer? Do you mind PCL's? Do you want a glidelock? Simple questions to answer.....best answer...TRF style....BOTH!! No wrong choice IMO |
26 May 2017, 09:43 PM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: UCLA
Watch: 126000, 11623
Posts: 119
|
Whoa results took a big change! back to even as I presumed we would be at originally lol
|
26 May 2017, 09:44 PM | #23 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Kuala Lumpur , Ma
Posts: 2,011
|
Welcome Tucker to my lair,
Seek your future if you dare, Slip 10 Bucks into my hair , And I'll tell you which Rolex to wear... |
26 May 2017, 09:45 PM | #24 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 26,846
|
I would go with submariner.
|
26 May 2017, 09:48 PM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: London
Posts: 1,221
|
I struggled to pick one but I went for the GMT, simply because the GMT function is useful and is an all round versatile watch. But the glidelock clasp on the Sub is amazing. Really really tough poll!
|
26 May 2017, 09:49 PM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: UCLA
Watch: 126000, 11623
Posts: 119
|
If I'm not mistaken both the GMT-Master II and Submariner current models actually use the same exact oyster bracelet, therefore both watches have Glidelock and PCL's. Right?
|
26 May 2017, 09:51 PM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Gerardus
Location: often in the air
Watch: ♕
Posts: 12,129
|
Both okay, glidelock clasp wins IMHO
__________________
♕126610 ♕126333 ♕116300 |
26 May 2017, 09:54 PM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: UCLA
Watch: 126000, 11623
Posts: 119
|
^also I thought it was called Easylink by rolex not glidelock. Both models have the same oyster band so both should have it?
|
26 May 2017, 09:55 PM | #29 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: In Motion
Watch: my wrist presence
Posts: 7,436
|
Quote:
And only the TT and PM subs have pcl's... The other subs have brushed SS oyster bracelet. |
|
26 May 2017, 10:24 PM | #30 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Real Name: Joshua
Location: Atlanta
Watch: Pelagos
Posts: 7,933
|
Sub or GMT?
Quote:
How is the GMT function useless? Dive computers have made dive watches like the Sub "useless" too. This day and age had rendered watches "useless" if you think about it but we still wear them. |
|
Tags |
gmt , submariner date |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.