Glidelock Vs 93160A

[rushca01]

I love the glidelock bracelet and especially the micro adjustment for when the wrist swells but I find the 93160A bracelet to be more comfortable. I think it's a combination of the 93160A being lighter and the clasp being stamped which makes it more comfortable on my wrist. Anybody else feel this way?

[Tools]

I like the engineering design of the Glidelock, it is a thing of beauty.

As to comfort, most of my watches have the old Tuna can clasp and are quite comfortable. I really do not see any true comfort advantages to the new clasps.

[rushca01]

Originally Posted by Tools

I like the engineering design of the Glidelock, it is a thing of beauty.

As to comfort, most of my watches have the old Tuna can clasp and are quite comfortable. I really do not see any true comfort advantages to the new clasps.

I agree, the only thing I miss when moving between the two is the micro adjust on the glidelock. I work out in the morning and train Brazilian Jiu jitsu in the afternoon so my wrist changes size quite a bit through the day.

[Mystro]

I like both but I find the glidelock more comfortable with its length on my wrist. Perhaps it's weight adds to the balance and in turn feels more comfortable. I seldom adjust the glidelock.

[Boaters]

I have worn just about every kind of bracelets with every kind of clasps and nothing IMPO compare's to the Glidelock it is thing of beauty just love the simplicity of use.

[bbressler]

Don't have a glidelock but I find the easylink much more comfortable than my 5 digits.

[sager]

Glidelock is the best