ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
11 October 2017, 05:00 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 546
|
Explorer II 40mm
Is the explorer II 40mm really 40mm? It looks smaller.
|
11 October 2017, 05:05 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Real Name: David
Location: Chicago
Watch: SkyD,JC, BLNR, Ex2
Posts: 1,578
|
I wonder. I own one. It does look smaller than my BLNR..
|
11 October 2017, 06:02 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: London
Watch: 124270
Posts: 537
|
39 mm
And the lugs on the BLNR make it look bigger than 40 also I’ve owned both Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
11 October 2017, 06:16 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 546
|
I keep going back and forth between the 40mm and the 42mm...the 42 looks so much bigger than the 40. I have DJ41 and the Exp II 42 seems so much bigger than it.
|
11 October 2017, 10:14 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 35,002
|
The adjustability of the bracelet and the easy link clasp swing it toward the 42 for me...the size thing is secondary.
|
11 October 2017, 10:24 AM | #6 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 2,809
|
Quote:
So, easy, just wait to buy that one. |
|
11 October 2017, 10:45 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Illinois
Posts: 3
|
I have a 14 year old Explorer 11 and I have looked at the 42. To me the 42 looks chunky and therefore picked up the new Explorer 1. Matter of taste tho.
|
12 October 2017, 12:07 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Jay
Location: TEXAS
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 7,648
|
When not wearing a Chronograph. I wear a Exp II 40mm
Really do like it. |
12 October 2017, 01:11 AM | #9 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 546
|
Quote:
|
|
12 October 2017, 01:16 AM | #10 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: CJ
Location: Kashyyyk
Watch: Kessel Run Chrono
Posts: 21,112
|
We really need a facepalm button.
|
12 October 2017, 01:22 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Real Name: Faz
Location: California
Watch: like'em all
Posts: 4,689
|
Do not discount the effect of larger hour markers and thicker hands in making it 'look' larger than the previous gen. Same effect (dial wise) between 5 and 6 digit Sub.
__________________
-Faz Instagram @fazmoto |
12 October 2017, 01:23 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Portland, Maine
Posts: 47
|
Mine measures 39mm, and I feel that is exactly how it wears.
|
12 October 2017, 03:48 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Ben
Location: Ireland
Watch: 1 OR 2
Posts: 2,640
|
My 'spidey senses' tell me that mine feels like 39mm too
|
12 October 2017, 09:57 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 2,809
|
Sorry, its not obvious to someone newer that my post is the kind of speculation that we get about the next Basel. I was just joshing. I would love a 40mm Explorer II though.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.