![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
![]() |
#1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: SF, CA
Posts: 833
|
44mm IO vs 42mm mustard
Tried these on at the AD... how do you guys think they look?
I am liking the fit of the titanium but the RG on the 42 looks more attractive on me, in my opinion. It might just be that shiny things attract me, but I am drawn by the thickness of the case as well. The mustard to me, as I am seeing many people refer to it as, is actually not too offputting to my eye as I know many members do not quite get a sensational feeling with it. I think pictures do not do it justice, however I do think I would prefer rubber over the leather. On the other hand, the titanium looks awesome and could be more dedicated as a daily. Almost inclined to pick one of these up. Looking forward to any honest inputs! Thanks! ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Ash
Location: UK
Watch: AP Royal Oak
Posts: 4,544
|
The titanium actually sits better on your wrist. I've had a few 42s and when I bought my 44 I found that it's just a better shape proportionally and as long as you can carry off the size then it wins hands down. The titanium looks great on you.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: SF, CA
Posts: 833
|
The pushers on the 44 kept digging into my wrist and was quite bothersome. It wasn't until after I had left the AD that I noticed many people on the board wearing it behind the wrist bone. Seems like a smart thing to do and will try doing that when my novelty 44 comes in.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Ash
Location: UK
Watch: AP Royal Oak
Posts: 4,544
|
The pushers on mine never bother me.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: SF, CA
Posts: 833
|
Do you find yourself wearing it close up towards the wrist? Currently for my Rolex I personally like it as snug up to the front at all possible times, as you can tell by the way I'm wearing them in the pictures...but I feel like that would not be the case for 44's
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Houston
Posts: 17,619
|
if you can pull off a 44 then i see no need to add a 42 unless its a diver. The 44 chronograph is a better design to me. Case shape, bezel, color scheme (for the RG).
I dont hate the RG 42mm, i just wouldn't choose it over a 44. If its in addition to a 44 I think its more viable.
__________________
Instagram: tyler.watches current collection: Patek 5164A, Patek 5524G, Rolex Platinum Daytona 116506, Rolex Sea Dweller 43 126600, Rolex GMT II 116710LN, AP 15400ST (silver), Panerai 913, Omega Speedmaster moonwatch, Tudor Black Bay (Harrods Edition) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: SF, CA
Posts: 833
|
Is a RG piece easy to be wearing all the time or are there certain situations you guys find yourself in where steel/titanium seems to be more fitting?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Ash
Location: UK
Watch: AP Royal Oak
Posts: 4,544
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Ash
Location: UK
Watch: AP Royal Oak
Posts: 4,544
|
This is how it sits on my wrist
![]() Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: SF, CA
Posts: 833
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Russel
Location: N/A
Watch: N/A
Posts: 755
|
44 looks better as the watch is sitting in the correct position - well where I wear my watches anyways :)
Also, the RG does not suit your complexion as nicely as the Ti model does. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Real Name: Brett
Location: Florida
Watch: 5205R
Posts: 5,160
|
Wow that 44 fits perfect on your wrist. Absolutely perfect. Just pick your favorite 44 and your good. I’m jealous. The 44 looks like a Batman tool on me.
__________________
Morality does not derive from consensus. It only comes from one place. Pride goes before destruction, and haughtiness before a fall. Often times unbelief is disguised as wisdom Instagram - patton250 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
Both look good on you and yes I wear my 44 back behind my wrist bone, as on all my watches, so the pushers don't touch the back of my hand when I raise my palms. If you like a bit of bling the RG 44 would be ideal I think.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 64,206
|
44 Ti all the way! Most comfortable watch I own. Also love my new RG44 and would take either all day long over a 42 ROO. It looks fine on you by the way so go for it!
__________________
SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: AP
Posts: 3,825
|
I think the TI looks great on you.
I tried on the YG the other day, which I didn’t love, but I preferred it by a fair margin over the Mustard. I loved the weight of the piece. ![]() Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: UK
Posts: 112
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Usa
Posts: 103
|
its the 44 Ti for me.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Global
Watch: 116719
Posts: 482
|
The 42 ROO is the ROO to own. It is true to the Genta design. I read recently that Genta would detest the deeply unsympathetic pusher housings. I much prefer the original ROO.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Ash
Location: UK
Watch: AP Royal Oak
Posts: 4,544
|
Quote:
Not factually correct. On my visit to the AP museum in Le Brassus the tour guide informed us that Gerald Genta detested the 42 Offshore and felt it had ruined his design. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Global
Watch: 116719
Posts: 482
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 352
|
AP RG is magnificent
Love the TI 44 but AP RG has a special presence. Can’t go wrong with either.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: UK
Posts: 1,314
|
Quote:
Great pic of the 42mm ROO ![]() Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: SF, CA
Posts: 833
|
The 44 felt quite large on my wrist although I would agree that it isn't overly sized. I am just prepared to take some time for the transition between my current 41mm Rolex.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: SF, CA
Posts: 833
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: SF, CA
Posts: 833
|
I am awaiting the arrival of my RG 44. Just taking a while to make it to its new home. Never got to see it in person so I went to the AD to try out the 44'for sizing and such. I noticed the rubbing on my wrist when raising my palms as well when I was wearing it. Couldn't say I really favored it so still have to try and see how it is behind the wristbone once it arrives!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: SF, CA
Posts: 833
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: SF, CA
Posts: 833
|
Felt torn between the 44 and 42 since the 44 doesn't come in bracelet and that was a turn off for me. However the pros outweighed the cons and the 44 just seemed like the right decision for me. That all gold 42 looks great though!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: SF, CA
Posts: 833
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: SF, CA
Posts: 833
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.