ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Highjinx · 27 February 2018, 09:07 PM

First time I got my two babies together and I notice something I have never seen mentioned on the forum. This is interesting in the PCL debate.

The GMT 2 bracelet has polished sides whereas the sub has brushed.

Hard to photo¡

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

Highjinx · 27 February 2018, 09:16 PM

Sorry - had some photo problems. Here is the side by side, of the sides.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6_...ew?usp=sharing

jrs146 · 27 February 2018, 11:15 PM

Interesting. I never realized that!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

kzm40 · 27 February 2018, 11:43 PM

Also odd that the sea-dweller is polished like the GMT.

Yousefsl · 28 February 2018, 12:07 AM

Just checked mine, never realised that before

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk

rollee1 · 28 February 2018, 02:33 AM

That is correct.
93150 is brushed sides whereas 78790A is polished sides, same as Explorer II 16570.

HogwldFLTR · 28 February 2018, 02:43 AM

It's true; I've noticed the differences myself.

27 February 2018, 09:07 PM	#1
Highjinx Banned Join Date: Feb 2016 Location: Vietnam Watch: Rolex Sub - 16610 Posts: 246	A subtle difference 16610 v 16710 First time I got my two babies together and I notice something I have never seen mentioned on the forum. This is interesting in the PCL debate. The GMT 2 bracelet has polished sides whereas the sub has brushed. Hard to photo¡ Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

27 February 2018, 11:15 PM	#3
jrs146 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2011 Real Name: Josh Location: Lost in time Watch: Me Nae Nae Posts: 9,823	Interesting. I never realized that! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ "Sometimes the songs that we hear are just songs of our own." -Jerome J. Garcia, Robert C. Hunter

28 February 2018, 02:33 AM	#6
rollee1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2015 Real Name: Rollee Location: Boston Watch: it watching me Posts: 1,945	That is correct. 93150 is brushed sides whereas 78790A is polished sides, same as Explorer II 16570. __________________ Time you enjoy wasting was not wasted

28 February 2018, 02:43 AM	#7
HogwldFLTR 2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2012 Real Name: Lee Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48 Watch: Too many to list! Posts: 33,824	It's true; I've noticed the differences myself. __________________ Troglodyte in residence! https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=808599

27 February 2018, 09:16 PM	#2
Highjinx Banned Join Date: Feb 2016 Location: Vietnam Watch: Rolex Sub - 16610 Posts: 246	Sorry - had some photo problems. Here is the side by side, of the sides. https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6_...ew?usp=sharing

27 February 2018, 11:43 PM	#4
kzm40 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: UK Posts: 713	Also odd that the sea-dweller is polished like the GMT.

28 February 2018, 12:07 AM	#5
Yousefsl "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2016 Location: UK Posts: 300	Just checked mine, never realised that before Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)