ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
12 June 2018, 09:05 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Australia
Posts: 121
|
Tudor Sub thoughts
Hi Everyone,
I'm looking at purchasing this tudor 7928, just wondering what your thoughts were. It appears to be a 66' model (serial # 505560), with the 'Gilt' outer minute track. The snowflake service hands is an interesting look, but how much would an original set of hands set me back? Also does the insert (although worn) look period correct? - i'm terrible with these >.< . The case seems to be worn/polished, is it beyond saving/too far gone? The price would (i think) be under market value, but that takes in to account the case condition and incorrect hands. Thanks! |
13 June 2018, 03:49 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Singapore
Posts: 158
|
it'll be interesting to know what movement is inside this 7928. As Snowflake hands only came on the 7016 & 7021 ref onwards, which had an ETA movement. From what i recall, the 7928 was a cal 390, and there was never any snowflake hands configuration, so I'd be surprised to learn that 7928 cal 390 would have SF hands to fit during service replacement. I could be dead wrong, but I'm rather skeptical about having SF hands on a 7928.
|
13 June 2018, 07:47 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Australia
Posts: 121
|
Yea, the hands are definitely wrong. And talking to another user, the serial dates it to 1965, which I've coborated as all the subs I could find as 505xxx were 1965s with chapter rings, so the dial also looks to be incorrect :(
Does anyone think this has value as parts? Or any other thoughts on the watch? Thanks! |
13 June 2018, 09:00 PM | #4 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Tennessee, USA
Watch: Seiko SKX009
Posts: 301
|
Quote:
|
|
13 June 2018, 09:51 PM | #5 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: RedSox Nation
Watch: U Talkn Bout Wilis
Posts: 5,498
|
The hands on the flake are the same size as the 7928 so it is possible to fit the original movement. Though just as likely to be swapped out. So yes, movement photos a must.
Dial is correct and nicer than what is typically found in the time. Case is soft, but not bad. Insert is a 70s version If the price was right, worth salvaging. I'd buy it for a project.
__________________
I'm a sailor peg. And I've lost my leg. Climbing up the top sails. I've lost my leg! |
14 June 2018, 02:06 PM | #6 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Singapore
Posts: 158
|
Quote:
That said, I'm not entirely i would commit to a piece like this as a project build, given that tudor 7928 parts are not common in the market place, and if selling parts like bracelet and sf hands would render suffice justification to source for period correct parts. But ultimately, its entirely up to you. Good luck with your decision! |
|
15 June 2018, 08:19 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,559
|
worth a shot Ed. Looks okay
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.