The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 14 September 2018, 09:29 PM   #1
WatchSmith
2024 Pledge Member
 
WatchSmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 702
Explorer I MKI to MKII conversion

2010 Explorer MKI with dial and hands upgraded to MKII. Took 3+ months for Rolex to ship parts to my watchmaker.

I liked the white gold numerals on the MKI, but prefer the MKII. Easier to read at night and maybe looks slightly less dressy which is my preference.

New dial and hands around $500. Superb watch and bloody accurate as hell.
Attached Images
File Type: jpeg BF49239D-EC3F-4A2E-A1F9-7910135C5020.jpeg (271.5 KB, 564 views)
WatchSmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 September 2018, 10:34 PM   #2
GBD
"TRF" Member
 
GBD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Texas
Posts: 442
Thanks for that info; I like both the MKI and MKII versions. Were you able to keep your original dial and hands?
GBD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 September 2018, 10:50 PM   #3
watchwatcher
"TRF" Member
 
watchwatcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 35,008
watchwatcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 September 2018, 11:53 PM   #4
WatchSmith
2024 Pledge Member
 
WatchSmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 702
Quote:
Originally Posted by GBD View Post
Thanks for that info; I like both the MKI and MKII versions. Were you able to keep your original dial and hands?
Of course not! LOL only with a dial and hands swap. I would have liked to though.
WatchSmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 September 2018, 12:59 AM   #5
037
2024 Pledge Member
 
037's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 6,173
Nice! Is your watchmaker independent with a parts account or does he/she work at an AD?
037 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 September 2018, 01:10 AM   #6
bkatx
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: TX
Posts: 125
Very cool. I'd like to do that with mine.
bkatx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 September 2018, 01:44 AM   #7
WatchSmith
2024 Pledge Member
 
WatchSmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 702
Quote:
Originally Posted by 037 View Post
Nice! Is your watchmaker independent with a parts account or does he/she work at an AD?
He works for an AD.
WatchSmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 September 2018, 01:46 AM   #8
WatchSmith
2024 Pledge Member
 
WatchSmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 702
Quote:
Originally Posted by bkatx View Post
Very cool. I'd like to do that with mine.
I dropped it of late May and the new dial was estimated at 2-3 weeks. Rolex kept saying backordered, so it ended up taking over 3 months. No big deal though and I'm really happy with the upgrade.
WatchSmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 September 2018, 01:48 AM   #9
037
2024 Pledge Member
 
037's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 6,173
Quote:
Originally Posted by Triplock View Post
He works for an AD.
Ok, that explains how he was able to get a dial. Rolex cut independents off from certain parts, even with trade-in and a parts account.

Watch looks great. I'm a big fan of the updated dial and hands.
037 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 September 2018, 02:19 AM   #10
Undefeatable
"TRF" Member
 
Undefeatable's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Irvine, CA
Watch: 124060
Posts: 496
Very cool! Any reason you did the swap instead of selling the MKI and buying a MKII?
Undefeatable is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 September 2018, 02:28 AM   #11
F1polesitter
"TRF" Member
 
F1polesitter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Canada
Posts: 204
So this should put to rest the question whether Rolex will allow MK1 to be turned to MK2 with new dial and hands. Very cool.
F1polesitter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 September 2018, 03:46 AM   #12
WatchSmith
2024 Pledge Member
 
WatchSmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 702
Quote:
Originally Posted by Undefeatable View Post
Very cool! Any reason you did the swap instead of selling the MKI and buying a MKII?
I thought it would be quick and easy. Wasn’t so quick though.
WatchSmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 September 2018, 03:46 AM   #13
WatchSmith
2024 Pledge Member
 
WatchSmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 702
Quote:
Originally Posted by Triplock View Post
I thought it would be quick and easy. Wasn’t so quick though.
Indeed it does.
WatchSmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 September 2018, 03:47 AM   #14
Colin G
"TRF" Member
 
Colin G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Canada
Watch: 216570, 214270
Posts: 683
How much longer are the new hands. A couple MM maybe?
Colin G is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 September 2018, 01:40 PM   #15
WatchSmith
2024 Pledge Member
 
WatchSmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 702
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colin G View Post
How much longer are the new hands. A couple MM maybe?
Maybe. The shorter ones didn’t bother me. I really wanted lumed numerals though.
WatchSmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 September 2018, 01:55 PM   #16
GradyPhilpott
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GradyPhilpott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK050
Posts: 34,449
__________________
JJ

Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner
GradyPhilpott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 September 2018, 02:17 PM   #17
bbressler
"TRF" Member
 
bbressler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Texas
Watch: Exp, GMTII, Sub
Posts: 1,184
Nice. I keep going back and forth about whether I want to do this or not. Today, I do haha
bbressler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 September 2018, 02:20 PM   #18
Onikage
"TRF" Member
 
Onikage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,757
Very nice.
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL
( D- Serial #)
ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4
Onikage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 September 2018, 05:10 PM   #19
stoo14
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 158
Interesting post, but I’m happy with my mk1 dial. I feel I don’t need lumed Arabics to tell the time in low light and I prefer how the WGs catch the light. The shorter hands also don’t bother me. The Explorer is vastly overlooked and more understated than other models. The fact the mk1 is seen by most as an ugly duckling/mistake, to me, makes it even more appealing to me.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
stoo14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 September 2018, 05:13 PM   #20
Cru Jones
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Cru Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,259
Cru Jones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 September 2018, 09:00 PM   #21
WatchSmith
2024 Pledge Member
 
WatchSmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 702
Quote:
Originally Posted by stoo14 View Post
Interesting post, but I’m happy with my mk1 dial. I feel I don’t need lumed Arabics to tell the time in low light and I prefer how the WGs catch the light. The shorter hands also don’t bother me. The Explorer is vastly overlooked and more understated than other models. The fact the mk1 is seen by most as an ugly duckling/mistake, to me, makes it even more appealing to me.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I think they’re quite nice and very far from ugly!
WatchSmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 September 2018, 04:09 AM   #22
doramas
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Gran Canaria
Posts: 3,469
Very nice, but for me, unnecessary
doramas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 September 2018, 05:38 AM   #23
polaris72
2024 Pledge Member
 
polaris72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: U.S./Vienna, AT
Posts: 1,967
Looks good, but not for me. I am happy with my MK I.
polaris72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 September 2018, 05:59 AM   #24
alphasports
"TRF" Member
 
alphasports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Montreal CAN
Posts: 454
I'm tempted...may ask my AD.
alphasports is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 September 2018, 07:37 AM   #25
stoo14
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 158
Quote:
Originally Posted by Triplock View Post
I think they’re quite nice and very far from ugly!


Me too. But it seems the majority of explorer lovers out there feel it should still be 36mm. The fact it was increased to 39mm with the original hands is too much for some to stomach.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
stoo14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 September 2018, 09:52 AM   #26
WatchSmith
2024 Pledge Member
 
WatchSmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 702
Quote:
Originally Posted by stoo14 View Post
Me too. But it seems the majority of explorer lovers out there feel it should still be 36mm. The fact it was increased to 39mm with the original hands is too much for some to stomach.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I really like the 36mm as well. It's kind of small compared to watches made today since the trend is for large (some stupidly large) models. But it's a classic and I certainly wouldn't turn one down. I'd love a nice 1016.
WatchSmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 September 2018, 10:02 AM   #27
debbs20
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 156
Thanks for sharing, I'm also tempted.
debbs20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 September 2018, 10:30 AM   #28
DoctorA
"TRF" Member
 
DoctorA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 6,545
Very cool! Rolex should consider making it that way!
__________________
Wear the watch you like, not the one they tell you to wear!
DoctorA is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.