ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
29 September 2018, 07:51 AM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Gran Canaria
Posts: 3,469
|
Datejust 16234 vs Datejust 116234
Aesthetically, which one do you like the most? Why?
16234 116234 |
29 September 2018, 09:19 AM | #2 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Australia
Watch: @ kostastimepieces
Posts: 5,272
|
6 digit , solid end links , hidden clasp , rehaut , ar cyclops , more substantial on the wrist without losing the 36mm Dj spirit :)
|
29 September 2018, 10:03 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: USA
Watch: Sub-date
Posts: 196
|
6 digit without doubt!
|
29 September 2018, 12:14 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Real Name: Adam
Location: HNL, LDN, SHA
Watch: 5 digit ref
Posts: 397
|
Had both.....flipped the 116234
The blinged out lugs collected hairline scratches from my shirt cuff and also i found the concealed clasp quite feminine |
29 September 2018, 02:15 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Real Name: Lee
Location: South East Asia
Watch: Tudor Pro
Posts: 1,798
|
6 Digit for sure.
The overall improvements leave the 5 digit looking like a relic from the past. |
30 September 2018, 03:27 AM | #6 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Real Name: Jonathan
Location: New York
Watch: GMT & SUB
Posts: 703
|
116234
|
30 September 2018, 03:30 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Real Name: AC
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: SD4K for now
Posts: 422
|
I have the 6 digit but always thought the 5 digit dial (markers without lume) looked better.
Sent from my VKY-L29 using Tapatalk |
30 September 2018, 06:39 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: James
Location: UK
Watch: Rolex & Omega
Posts: 6,668
|
|
5 November 2018, 01:50 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Timbuktu
Posts: 7
|
16234 I prefer non lumed markers and brushed metal case
|
5 November 2018, 05:38 AM | #10 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Gran Canaria
Posts: 3,469
|
|
5 November 2018, 05:41 AM | #11 |
TechXpert
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Earth
Posts: 23,629
|
The brushed lugs make this DateJust less flashy, it is the OG Rolex IMO. 16234 all the way
|
5 November 2018, 05:52 AM | #12 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,253
|
I am normally a 6-digit guy, but for the DJ, I much prefer the aesthetics of the thinner and brushed lugs of the 5-digit DJ. Just fits the model better, IMHO.
|
5 November 2018, 06:07 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 29
|
I just got the 116234 in black and I’m in love with it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
5 November 2018, 06:10 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Paradise Island
Watch: Daytona 116520
Posts: 998
|
116234 is WAY BETTER than previous gen.
|
5 November 2018, 06:17 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Bucuresti
Watch: a Rolex duo
Posts: 1,969
|
6 digit: solid bracelet, lume batons, hidden clasp
|
5 November 2018, 06:18 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Real Name: Bax
Location: OK
Watch: SEA-DWELLER
Posts: 107
|
5 digit. Brushed lugs. I think the new polished models have ruined the greatest wristwatch of all time.
|
5 November 2018, 07:34 AM | #17 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Gran Canaria
Posts: 3,469
|
|
5 November 2018, 08:38 AM | #18 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Real Name: Jonathan
Location: New York
Watch: GMT & SUB
Posts: 703
|
6 digit for dj 5 digit for professional
|
5 November 2018, 10:50 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Posts: 363
|
6-digit: lumed sticks, hidden clasp, engraved rehaut, AR cyclops, heavier more luxurious feeling watch for me. When I tried it on, my choice was pretty much made for me on the spot. That, and that the 5-digit used jubilee bracelets tend to be really stretched.
__________________
114060, 116710BLNR, 116234WSJ, Omega 311.30 16710 N-serial "Coke" (SOLD) |
6 November 2018, 04:46 AM | #20 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Gran Canaria
Posts: 3,469
|
|
6 November 2018, 05:56 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Karis
Location: USA
Posts: 19,377
|
|
6 November 2018, 06:09 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Gerardus
Location: often in the air
Watch: ♕
Posts: 12,129
|
x2
__________________
♕126610 ♕126333 ♕116300 |
6 November 2018, 06:21 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Bucuresti
Watch: a Rolex duo
Posts: 1,969
|
|
6 November 2018, 11:39 PM | #24 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Gran Canaria
Posts: 3,469
|
|
7 November 2018, 01:42 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: PNW
Watch: All of them
Posts: 326
|
Same here. But the 2018 ref. 126xxx seems to have slightly slimmer lugs now. If they were to brush the lug surfaces it would be divine!
|
7 November 2018, 02:49 AM | #26 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,405
|
16234 is aesthetically superior
I appreciate its construction more also because it retains its classic dress look instead of becoming a rugged sports watch |
7 November 2018, 03:16 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: London
Watch: 1680/8 & '88 16528
Posts: 723
|
Looks - 5 digit.
Functionality - 6 digit |
7 November 2018, 03:40 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: James
Location: UK
Watch: Rolex & Omega
Posts: 6,668
|
|
7 November 2018, 04:11 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Posts: 363
|
I agree for professional/sports but the DJ36 is quite small on the wrist. The extra 6-digit beef makes up for that.
__________________
114060, 116710BLNR, 116234WSJ, Omega 311.30 16710 N-serial "Coke" (SOLD) |
7 November 2018, 06:08 AM | #30 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Gran Canaria
Posts: 3,469
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.