The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Audemars Piguet Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 6 October 2018, 09:35 PM   #1
Stringerb3ll
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Dubai
Posts: 79
AP ROC is 16k gbp too steep for a SS watch

Hi All,

I’m new to watch collecting, had a tag aquaracer and Raymond Weil Geneve for years and recently bought the Wimbledon DJ and have caught the bug.

Looking at adding an AP to my collection now but just feel that 16k is a lot for a stainless steel watch.

Can people throw in their two cents and remove the doubt from my mind please 😁
Stringerb3ll is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 October 2018, 11:49 PM   #2
Burlington
"TRF" Member
 
Burlington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Europe
Posts: 5,641
The value doesn't come from the material, rather the workmanship and quality of finishing.

This was also the wow factor for the original RO, a steel watch that cost more than gold. Rather its the elevation of a simple metal into something which is worth so much more.

Think of it as a 3* Michelin restaurant serving up pork belly, low cost cut, but when handled with skill it can be transformed into something exquisite.
__________________
“My tastes are simple; I am easily satisfied with the best.”

― Winston S. Churchill
Burlington is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2018, 12:03 AM   #3
tyler1980
"TRF" Member
 
tyler1980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Houston
Posts: 17,622
its £21,500... So consider 16k a sale
__________________
Instagram: tyler.watches
current collection: Patek 5164A, Patek 5524G, Rolex Platinum Daytona 116506, Rolex Sea Dweller 43 126600, Rolex GMT II 116710LN, AP 15400ST (silver), Panerai 913, Omega Speedmaster moonwatch, Tudor Black Bay (Harrods Edition)
tyler1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2018, 12:17 AM   #4
Fat_ninja
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2018
Real Name: Jonathan
Location: USA
Watch: P-01
Posts: 11,772
I could be mistaken but Genta made the expensive SS watches a thing.

I could be really really really wrong...

I mean you are looking at a ROyal oak.
Fat_ninja is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2018, 12:53 AM   #5
Jace
"TRF" Member
 
Jace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Real Name: Jace
Location: Boca Raton
Watch: Platinum DD 40
Posts: 329
Welcome to the torture my friend. If you are looking at this luxury non utilitarian item from a material cost stand point we are all freakin nuts.

So what are you paying for? Provenance, innovation, and finish quality.

Provenance: in the seventies the mechanical watch industry was in a free fall because of quartz watches. They were going under and fast. Even the venerable Patek started making quartz watches. AP, which was then and still is family owned, hired Gerald Genta to design a sports watch in “GASP” stainless steel. No one in haute horology did this. And then...they price pointed it at ten time the price of a Rolex, more than their precious metal watches. They literally gambled their whole company on the legendary a series nick named the Jumbo. It was all steel, modern and huge by the standard of the time even though it is a mere 39 mm. It changed the entire watch industry. That’s provenance. The Patek Nautilus is a derivation of the Royal Oak (which Genta designed as a women’s watch) as is the IWC Ingeneur.

Innovation: say what you want about AP and their unlimited number of limited editions, they have guts. More than any of the top brands they are constantly pushing the edge with new materials like carbon fiber, mixing titanium with platinum and ceramic. It will make you dizzy.

Finish: like every haute brand (Patek, AP, VC Lange, JLC etc...) every single part is finished and polished to a ridiculous degree, especially the parts that you will never see. It takes an incredible amount of time to do this. A Rolex would never come close to this. Put a loop on it and you will be stunned by the detail. True artistry.

Is it worth it? Practically, no. But for those of us with the sickness, who don’t want to watch the world through a tiny phone, who still write hand written notes with fountain pens, who marvel that people can actually build these incredibly delicate intricate machines that are accurate to an ungodly degree powered by your wrist...yes.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Jace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2018, 01:58 AM   #6
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,368
I think that is a fair price today, altho a few years ago I bought a lightly used RG ROC for the same price. However last year I paid £10K more for a SS Patek so gotta move with the times and Pay to Play.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2018, 02:07 AM   #7
RolexZen
"TRF" Member
 
RolexZen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Atlanta
Watch: No Rolex
Posts: 722
Yes, 16K GBP for a stainless steel watch is a lot of money. Too steep? That’s relative. The price you paid for a Tag is too steep for many. The price you paid for a DJ is too steep for many more.
RolexZen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2018, 04:38 AM   #8
kurgan999
"TRF" Member
 
kurgan999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: over the rainbow
Watch: ap bee
Posts: 32
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jace View Post
Welcome to the torture my friend. If you are looking at this luxury non utilitarian item from a material cost stand point we are all freakin nuts.

So what are you paying for? Provenance, innovation, and finish quality.

Provenance: in the seventies the mechanical watch industry was in a free fall because of quartz watches. They were going under and fast. Even the venerable Patek started making quartz watches. AP, which was then and still is family owned, hired Gerald Genta to design a sports watch in “GASP” stainless steel. No one in haute horology did this. And then...they price pointed it at ten time the price of a Rolex, more than their precious metal watches. They literally gambled their whole company on the legendary a series nick named the Jumbo. It was all steel, modern and huge by the standard of the time even though it is a mere 39 mm. It changed the entire watch industry. That’s provenance. The Patek Nautilus is a derivation of the Royal Oak (which Genta designed as a women’s watch) as is the IWC Ingeneur.

Innovation: say what you want about AP and their unlimited number of limited editions, they have guts. More than any of the top brands they are constantly pushing the edge with new materials like carbon fiber, mixing titanium with platinum and ceramic. It will make you dizzy.

Finish: like every haute brand (Patek, AP, VC Lange, JLC etc...) every single part is finished and polished to a ridiculous degree, especially the parts that you will never see. It takes an incredible amount of time to do this. A Rolex would never come close to this. Put a loop on it and you will be stunned by the detail. True artistry.

Is it worth it? Practically, no. But for those of us with the sickness, who don’t want to watch the world through a tiny phone, who still write hand written notes with fountain pens, who marvel that people can actually build these incredibly delicate intricate machines that are accurate to an ungodly degree powered by your wrist...yes.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk


what a post ...

epic .

ty for this.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
kurgan999 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2018, 04:56 AM   #9
diegohwang
"TRF" Member
 
diegohwang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Real Name: Diego
Location: Dallas, TX
Watch: Audemars Piguet
Posts: 112
AP ROC is 16k gbp too steep for a SS watch

To justify the price could be subjective but I agree with a lot of the comments above. The craftsmanship, level of detailing, machining, and movement are all far superior components that come with the brand. This is why AP has been able to set itself at the forefront for boutique, ultimate luxury timepieces. Though of course from a cost standpoint, sure it costs a fraction to make a watch than what it retails for. That’s where the logic plays a role, but paying respect for the time that it takes these watchmakers to become the watchmakers they are today, it requires years of experience and skill. Some food for thought, but luxury timepieces are an art, and needs time to be appreciated and leaned in its own right.

Using Tapatalk
__________________
When you're tired, learn to rest but never give up

Instagram: @zenwatchcollection
diegohwang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2018, 05:00 AM   #10
Jace
"TRF" Member
 
Jace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Real Name: Jace
Location: Boca Raton
Watch: Platinum DD 40
Posts: 329
Aw, shucks.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Jace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2018, 06:54 AM   #11
NicholasNJ
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: SUB / SEA
Posts: 87
But beware OP, once you buy one of these ‘overpriced’ SS watches you’ll soon enter into a spiral where being able to get one you want and paying a bit over retail is justifiable



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
NicholasNJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
roc


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.