ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

baamvino · 20 January 2019, 02:09 AM

Hi, I currently have 3 rolexes in my collection, which are -
116520 white dial daytona
14060 No date Sub two liner
16570 Exp II black dial

But, wanted to know if it’s a good idea for me to modify my collection as below-
15450 or 15400 AP Royal Oak
14060 No date Sub two liner

I might add something later, but currently thinking about selling my daytona & expii for RO. Going from three watches to two watch collection. What do you guys think?

Hard_Six · 20 January 2019, 02:23 AM

I wouldn't. But that's just me. If you prefer the RO, then go for it.

I own a ROO and while I love it, I prefer certain aspects of Rolex, so trading away Rolex's for AP isn't something I would do. Adding one? Sure. Trading away Rolex's for one? Not me.

Again, different strokes for different folks. Do what makes you happy

HogwldFLTR · 20 January 2019, 02:44 AM

Not fond of APs so, no!!!

rmlovett1 · 20 January 2019, 02:45 AM

I’d stay put :)

ap1 · 20 January 2019, 02:55 AM

Daytona, sub, RO

rcwatches · 20 January 2019, 02:55 AM

I would part ex explorer ii for one if one has to go

Dr. Robert · 20 January 2019, 02:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HogwldFLTR

Not fond of APs so, no!!!

Moi aussi

BigBoy17 · 20 January 2019, 03:00 AM

Add some color... gmt blnr or hulk

sillo · 20 January 2019, 03:05 AM

Personally I'd keep what you have.

HogwldFLTR · 20 January 2019, 03:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr. Robert

Moi aussi

I don't ride an Aussi, drive a Mini!!!

Vinyasa · 20 January 2019, 03:41 AM

That’s a great collection, I wouldn’t change a thing!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

subtona · 20 January 2019, 03:44 AM

Stay as is.

maxi2015 · 20 January 2019, 03:50 AM

I really love the royal oak. It's a beautiful, angular and refined piece, but losing the Daytona would be a shame. It's a very beautiful watch and having a chronograph does add something to a duo rather than having two time and date watches. The white dial pre ceramic is very understated and would complement a royal oak in a collection. So, my vote would actually be to get the royal oak (15400 if you can pull it off) but instead get rid of the sub and the explorer 2. Or as you said, get rid of the Daytona and explorer and keep the sub if you can't get rid of it. Adding the royal oak isn't a mistake by any means, you won't regret it.
Don't know if this is a consideration or not but good to consider every option :)
M

20 January 2019, 02:09 AM	#1
baamvino "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2015 Location: US Posts: 318	Should I modify my collection? Hi, I currently have 3 rolexes in my collection, which are - 116520 white dial daytona 14060 No date Sub two liner 16570 Exp II black dial But, wanted to know if it’s a good idea for me to modify my collection as below- 15450 or 15400 AP Royal Oak 14060 No date Sub two liner I might add something later, but currently thinking about selling my daytona & expii for RO. Going from three watches to two watch collection. What do you guys think?

20 January 2019, 02:44 AM	#3
HogwldFLTR 2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2012 Real Name: Lee Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48 Watch: Too many to list! Posts: 33,668	Not fond of APs so, no!!! __________________ Troglodyte in residence! https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=808599

20 January 2019, 02:55 AM	#6
rcwatches "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2015 Location: London, UK Watch: Rose Daytona Posts: 672	I would part ex explorer ii for one if one has to go __________________ Instagram: @rcwatches Facebook: @rcwatches

20 January 2019, 03:05 AM	#9
sillo "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2015 Real Name: Sean Location: NY Watch: 5 Digit Posts: 2,840	Personally I'd keep what you have. __________________ 14060 \| 16570 \| 16600 \| 16700 \| 16800 \| 79260 @TheGMTHand

20 January 2019, 03:44 AM	#12
subtona "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Real Name: gus Location: East Coast Watch: APK & sometimes Y Posts: 26,551	Stay as is. __________________

20 January 2019, 02:23 AM	#2
Hard_Six "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2016 Real Name: Trey Location: Texas Watch: those three’s roll Posts: 3,036	I wouldn't. But that's just me. If you prefer the RO, then go for it. I own a ROO and while I love it, I prefer certain aspects of Rolex, so trading away Rolex's for AP isn't something I would do. Adding one? Sure. Trading away Rolex's for one? Not me. Again, different strokes for different folks. Do what makes you happy

20 January 2019, 02:45 AM	#4
rmlovett1 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2015 Real Name: Richard Location: GA Watch: YTBD Posts: 23,465	I’d stay put :)

20 January 2019, 02:55 AM	#5
ap1 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Mar 2013 Location: usa Posts: 19,517	Daytona, sub, RO

20 January 2019, 03:00 AM	#8
BigBoy17 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2019 Real Name: Nik Location: NYC Posts: 1,166	Add some color... gmt blnr or hulk

20 January 2019, 03:41 AM	#11
Vinyasa "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2016 Real Name: Steve Location: Maine Watch: Explorer II 16570 Posts: 1,396	That’s a great collection, I wouldn’t change a thing! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

20 January 2019, 03:50 AM	#13
maxi2015 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2015 Location: Sydney, Australia Posts: 11	I really love the royal oak. It's a beautiful, angular and refined piece, but losing the Daytona would be a shame. It's a very beautiful watch and having a chronograph does add something to a duo rather than having two time and date watches. The white dial pre ceramic is very understated and would complement a royal oak in a collection. So, my vote would actually be to get the royal oak (15400 if you can pull it off) but instead get rid of the sub and the explorer 2. Or as you said, get rid of the Daytona and explorer and keep the sub if you can't get rid of it. Adding the royal oak isn't a mistake by any means, you won't regret it. Don't know if this is a consideration or not but good to consider every option :) M

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)