ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
17 March 2019, 07:50 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 21
|
80s 16610 Box/Lugs Question
Is this the right box for an L serial 16610? Do the lugs look like they have been polished too many times? Any other thoughts?
https://imgur.com/a/4B13vfW |
17 March 2019, 10:33 AM | #2 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,490
|
No, it's not the right box.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
17 March 2019, 11:05 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 21
|
|
17 March 2019, 08:20 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: David
Location: australia
Posts: 20,215
|
Box is not correct
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
watches many |
17 March 2019, 08:41 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,349
|
Lugs don't look too bad but it's hard to tell from these washed out pictures...
|
19 March 2019, 08:39 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 21
|
Appreciate all the expertise and help. Two follow up questions: (1) is it suspicious for a L23XXXX serial number to be dated January 1988? (I thought that L serials tended to be 89, and while possible to be 88, I'm surprised to see one in the very beginning of 88.) (2) it appears that the end links shaved metal off the inside of the lugs, how concerning is that?
Pics: https://i.imgur.com/MM0g3Tl.jpg https://i.imgur.com/ue4YOyK.jpg https://i.imgur.com/a3ninrj.jpg |
20 March 2019, 05:14 AM | #7 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,490
|
Letter prefixes do not designate a year, regardless what popular lore is on forums.
Enthusiasts have seen about when watches have hit the market and guessed at the dates of letter prefix serials, then made charts in varying levels of accuracy. There have almost always been more than one letter prefix being produced in any given year. It is almost a certainty that when R's were seen in 1987 and got that "date", Rolex was also gearing up to release the next letter, L; so there will be overlap in both directions.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
31 August 2019, 11:22 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Australia
Watch: 1989 16610 Sub
Posts: 258
|
Nice watch....I'm biased though.own a 1989 L series.sub date :-)
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.